Softwr

Software Development · head to head

Drizzle ORM vs Steampipe

Drizzle ORM logo

Drizzle ORM

Software Development

Headless TypeScript ORM and SQL query builder

From
Free
Rated
-
Steampipe logo

Steampipe

Developer Tools

Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Drizzle ORM it is entirely community/sponsor-funded with no official paid support tier for enterprises needing SLAs.; Steampipe aGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
  • They diverge on capability: Drizzle ORM covers Type-safe query builder, Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Drizzle ORM and Steampipe actually diverge.

Attributes where Drizzle ORM and Steampipe differ
AttributeDrizzle ORMSteampipe
Pricing modelopen-sourceOpen source, with paid hosting through Turbot Pipes
Platformsweb, apimacOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web
CategorySoftware DevelopmentDeveloper Tools

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Drizzle ORM

  • Type-safe query builder
  • Schema migrations
  • Drizzle Studio
  • Multi-database support
  • Serverless-ready drivers
  • Zero dependencies

Only in Steampipe

  • SQL over live APIs
  • Wide plugin set
  • Embedded Postgres
  • Compliance benchmarks
  • Joins across providers
  • Hosted option

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Drizzle ORM

  • Type-safe database access in TypeScript backendsnot Steampipe
  • Serverless and edge applications needing lightweight database driversnot Steampipe
  • Teams migrating from raw SQL for better type safetynot Steampipe
  • Projects wanting SQL-like control without a heavy ORM abstractionnot Steampipe

Steampipe

  • Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly exportnot Drizzle ORM
  • Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is askednot Drizzle ORM
  • Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one querynot Drizzle ORM
  • Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line toolnot Drizzle ORM

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Drizzle ORM

  • It is entirely community/sponsor-funded with no official paid support tier for enterprises needing SLAs.
  • The relational query API is newer than the SQL-like API and has historically had fewer advanced features.
  • Documentation and ecosystem tooling are less mature than Prisma's, which has a larger community and GUI ecosystem.
  • MSSQL and CockroachCB support are newer additions still stabilizing toward a 1.0 release.

Steampipe

  • AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
  • Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
  • Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
  • The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
  • Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.

Pricing, plan by plan

Drizzle ORM

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Full ORM and query builder
    • drizzle-kit migrations
    • Drizzle Studio

Steampipe

Free
  • Steampipe CLIFree
    • AGPL-3.0
    • All plugins
    • No user or query limits
  • Pipes DeveloperFree
    • One user
    • 400 compute minutes
    • 3GB storage
  • Pipes Team$49/month
    • Three users
    • 2,000 compute minutes
    • 20GB storage
  • Pipes Enterprise$249/month
    • Three users
    • 10,000 compute minutes
    • 100GB storage

Which should you pick?

Choose Drizzle ORM if

  • You need type-safe query builder.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on web, api.
  • You also want schema migrations.

Choose Steampipe if

  • You need sql over live apis.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
  • You also want wide plugin set.

Questions people ask

Is Drizzle ORM or Steampipe better?
Neither clearly leads. Drizzle ORM starts at Free and Steampipe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Drizzle ORM or Steampipe?
Drizzle ORM starts at Free and Steampipe at Free.
Does Drizzle ORM or Steampipe run on more platforms?
Drizzle ORM runs on web, api. Steampipe runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
Can I use Drizzle ORM for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Drizzle ORM best used for?
Drizzle ORM is most often used for type-safe database access in typescript backends, serverless and edge applications needing lightweight database drivers, teams migrating from raw sql for better type safety, projects wanting sql-like control without a heavy orm abstraction. Of those, type-safe database access in typescript backends and serverless and edge applications needing lightweight database drivers are not what Steampipe is typically brought in for.
What can Drizzle ORM do that Steampipe cannot?
Drizzle ORM covers Type-safe query builder, Schema migrations, Drizzle Studio, Multi-database support. Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Wide plugin set, Embedded Postgres, Compliance benchmarks.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Drizzle ORM: What does Drizzle ORM cost?

Drizzle ORM is completely free and open-source with no licensing fees; the team accepts community sponsorships and contributions rather than charging for the software.

Source
Steampipe: When did Steampipe become AGPL?

May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.

Drizzle ORM: Which databases does Drizzle support?

Drizzle supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, MSSQL, CockroachDB and SingleStore, with specialized drivers for providers like Neon, Supabase, Vercel Postgres and Turso.

Source
Steampipe: Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?

Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.

Drizzle ORM: Does Drizzle include migration tooling?

Yes, the drizzle-kit CLI provides generate, push, pull and check commands for managing schema migrations, and Drizzle Studio offers a visual way to browse and edit data.

Source
Steampipe: Is it fast on a large cloud estate?

Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.

Steampipe: Does the AGPL affect internal use?

Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.

Steampipe: Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?

It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads