Cybersecurity · head to head
Drata vs Steampipe

Drata
Cybersecurity
Agentic trust management with compliance automation.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Steampipe
Developer Tools
Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Steampipe has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Drata no published pricing for any tier; requires contacting sales team for quotes; Steampipe aGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Drata and Steampipe actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Drata
Nothing recorded that Steampipe does not also cover.
Only in Steampipe
- SQL over live APIs
- Wide plugin set
- Embedded Postgres
- Compliance benchmarks
- Joins across providers
- Hosted option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Drata
- SaaS companies automating SOC 2 certification for enterprise salesnot Steampipe
- Organisations managing multi-framework compliance simultaneouslynot Steampipe
- Vendor management programmes requiring third-party security assessmentsnot Steampipe
- Enterprises implementing AI governance and monitoring AI systemsnot Steampipe
- Organisations seeking continuous compliance monitoring rather than point-in-time auditsnot Steampipe
Steampipe
- Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly exportnot Drata
- Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is askednot Drata
- Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one querynot Drata
- Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line toolnot Drata
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Drata
- No published pricing for any tier; requires contacting sales team for quotes
- Solution tiers (Startup, Growth, Enterprise) are marketing categories with no corresponding published prices or feature differentiation
- No transparency on cost per framework, per user, or based on organisational size
- AI questionnaire automation claims 375+ hours saved annually but does not publish per-questionnaire costs or limits
- Compared directly with Vanta by customers, but pricing opaque for cost-benefit analysis
Steampipe
- AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
- Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
- Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
- The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
- Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.
Pricing, plan by plan
Drata
On request- Startup$undefined/variable
- 'Launch Trust Fast' with automated evidence collection
- SOC 2 and other framework support
- Basic compliance automation
- Growth$undefined/variable
- 'Accelerate Trust Smoothly' as teams expand
- Multi-framework compliance
- Enhanced AI automation
- Enterprise$undefined/variable
- 'Command Trust at Scale' for complex needs
- Advanced GRC capabilities
- Dedicated support
Steampipe
Free- Steampipe CLIFree
- AGPL-3.0
- All plugins
- No user or query limits
- Pipes DeveloperFree
- One user
- 400 compute minutes
- 3GB storage
- Pipes Team$49/month
- Three users
- 2,000 compute minutes
- 20GB storage
- Pipes Enterprise$249/month
- Three users
- 10,000 compute minutes
- 100GB storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Steampipe if
- You need sql over live apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- You also want wide plugin set.
Questions people ask
- Is Drata or Steampipe better?
- Neither clearly leads. Drata starts at On request and Steampipe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Drata or Steampipe?
- Steampipe has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Drata and Free for Steampipe.
- Does Drata or Steampipe run on more platforms?
- Drata runs on Web, API. Steampipe runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Steampipe for free?
- Yes. Steampipe has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Drata starts at On request.
- What is Drata best used for?
- Drata is most often used for saas companies automating soc 2 certification for enterprise sales, organisations managing multi-framework compliance simultaneously, vendor management programmes requiring third-party security assessments, enterprises implementing ai governance and monitoring ai systems. Of those, saas companies automating soc 2 certification for enterprise sales and organisations managing multi-framework compliance simultaneously are not what Steampipe is typically brought in for.
- What can Drata do that Steampipe cannot?
- Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Wide plugin set, Embedded Postgres, Compliance benchmarks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Drata: What compliance frameworks does Drata support?
Drata supports multiple frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS and others, with multi-framework management capabilities.
SourceSteampipe: When did Steampipe become AGPL?
May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.
Drata: Does Drata automate questionnaires?
Yes. Drata's AI uses approved content to draft consistent responses, automating questionnaire completion and saving claimed 375+ hours per year.
SourceSteampipe: Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?
Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.
Drata: How many customers does Drata have?
Drata serves 8,500+ global customers ranging from startups to enterprises, with a 4.8/5.0 rating on G2.
SourceSteampipe: Is it fast on a large cloud estate?
Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.
Steampipe: Does the AGPL affect internal use?
Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.
Steampipe: Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?
It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Drata vs Norton 360
- Drata vs LogicManager
- Drata vs 1Password
- Drata vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Drata vs LastPass
- Drata vs Vanta
- Drata vs OneTrust
- Drata vs Transcend
- Drata vs Silent Eight
- Drata vs NICE Actimize
- Drata vs Omada Identity
- Drata vs Saviynt
- Drata vs Burp Suite
- Drata vs Check Point Software
- Drata vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Drata vs Darktrace
- Drata vs Diligent
- Drata vs Bitdefender VPN
- Drata vs Atlantis
- Drata vs Jitsu
- Drata vs Frappe
- Drata vs Visual Studio Code
- Drata vs Penpot
- Drata vs GNU Emacs
- Drata vs Bazel
- Drata vs Eclipse IDE
- Drata vs Pants Build
- Drata vs Swagger UI
- Drata vs Ansible
- Drata vs Helix
- Drata vs Deep Code
- Drata vs Deno
- Drata vs Fig
- Drata vs Git
- Drata vs GoLand
- Steampipe vs Norton 360
- Steampipe vs LogicManager
- Steampipe vs 1Password
- Steampipe vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Steampipe vs LastPass
- Steampipe vs Vanta
- Steampipe vs OneTrust
- Steampipe vs Transcend
- Steampipe vs Silent Eight
- Steampipe vs NICE Actimize
- Steampipe vs Omada Identity
- Steampipe vs Saviynt
- Steampipe vs Burp Suite
- Steampipe vs Check Point Software
- Steampipe vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Steampipe vs Darktrace
- Steampipe vs Diligent
- Steampipe vs Bitdefender VPN
- Steampipe vs Atlantis
- Steampipe vs Jitsu
- Steampipe vs Frappe
- Steampipe vs Visual Studio Code
- Steampipe vs Penpot
- Steampipe vs GNU Emacs
- Steampipe vs Bazel
- Steampipe vs Eclipse IDE
- Steampipe vs Pants Build
- Steampipe vs Swagger UI
- Steampipe vs Ansible
- Steampipe vs Helix
- Steampipe vs Deep Code
- Steampipe vs Deno
- Steampipe vs Fig
- Steampipe vs Git
- Steampipe vs GoLand
