Databases · head to head
Dragonfly vs Qdrant

Dragonfly
Databases
High-performance Redis-compatible in-memory datastore with 25x better throughput
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Qdrant
Databases
High-performance vector database for similarity search and embedding-based retrieval
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dragonfly flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring; Qdrant free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dragonfly and Qdrant actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dragonfly
- Redis API compatibility
- Thread-per-core architecture
- High-performance caching
- Memory efficiency
- Real-time leaderboards
- Message queue support
- ML feature serving
- Cloud deployment
Only in Qdrant
Nothing recorded that Dragonfly does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dragonfly
- High-throughput caching for web applicationsnot Qdrant
- Real-time leaderboards and rankingsnot Qdrant
- Message queue and event processingnot Qdrant
- ML model feature serving at millisecond latenciesnot Qdrant
- Gaming session state and player data storagenot Qdrant
Qdrant
- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) backends for LLM applicationsnot Dragonfly
- Semantic search across large document corporanot Dragonfly
- Multimodal retrieval (text, images, video) for recommendation systemsnot Dragonfly
- Similarity-based product or content recommendationsnot Dragonfly
- Real-time vector indexing for streaming embedding datanot Dragonfly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dragonfly
- Flex tier starting at $36/month may be underpriced, requiring careful usage monitoring
- Business tier $2,000/month represents significant jump in cost
- Limited to in-memory storage, not suitable for cold data or archival
- Bring-your-own-cloud requirement on Business tier adds operational complexity
- Cloud availability dependent on AWS/GCP/Azure uptime
Qdrant
- Free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
- Standard and Premium pricing usage-based; specific costs not published; requires calculator or quote
- Requires understanding of embeddings and vector search concepts; not suitable for SQL-only teams
- Early-stage serverless offering (coming soon) suggests maturity gaps in that deployment model
Pricing, plan by plan
Dragonfly
Free- Free TierFree
- 100 cloud credits for new signups
- Equivalent to free trial
- Business$2000/month
- Starting price for enterprise offering
- Bring-your-own-cloud deployment
- Auto-scaling with custom SLAs
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Any-cloud deployment
- Custom instances and sizing
Qdrant
Free- FreeFree
- Single-node cluster
- 0.5 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- Standard$undefined/usage-based
- Dedicated resources
- Flexible scaling
- High availability
- Premium$undefined/minimum spend
- SSO and SAML
- Private VPC links
- 99.9% uptime SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Dragonfly if
- You need redis api compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want thread-per-core architecture.
Choose Qdrant if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming).
Questions people ask
- Is Dragonfly or Qdrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dragonfly starts at Free and Qdrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dragonfly or Qdrant?
- Dragonfly starts at Free and Qdrant at Free.
- Does Dragonfly or Qdrant run on more platforms?
- Dragonfly runs on Cloud, AWS, GCP, Azure. Qdrant runs on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming).
- Can I use Dragonfly for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dragonfly best used for?
- Dragonfly is most often used for high-throughput caching for web applications, real-time leaderboards and rankings, message queue and event processing, ml model feature serving at millisecond latencies. Of those, high-throughput caching for web applications and real-time leaderboards and rankings are not what Qdrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Dragonfly do that Qdrant cannot?
- Dragonfly covers Redis API compatibility, Thread-per-core architecture, High-performance caching, Memory efficiency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dragonfly: How much faster is Dragonfly than Redis?
Dragonfly achieves 3.97M queries per second compared to Redis's 718K QPS, representing a 25x improvement. Memory efficiency is also 30% better.
SourceQdrant: Can I use Qdrant for free?
Yes, Qdrant offers a free tier that provides a single node cluster with 0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, and 4GB disk space. It includes free cloud inference with selected models and is described as free forever for testing and prototypes.
SourceDragonfly: Can I migrate from Redis to Dragonfly without code changes?
Yes. Dragonfly maintains full API compatibility with Redis and Memcached, allowing drop-in replacement with minimal to no code modifications.
SourceQdrant: How is Qdrant Cloud billing calculated?
Billing is calculated based on actual resource usage during each billing period. You are charged hourly for compute (vCPU), memory (GB), storage (GB), backups, and any paid inference tokens used.
SourceQdrant: What happens if I scale beyond the free tier?
The Standard Tier uses the same usage-based billing model as the free tier but adds features like dedicated resources with flexible scaling, highly available setups with backup and disaster recovery, and a 99.5% uptime SLA.
SourceQdrant: What SLA does Qdrant offer?
The Standard Tier provides 99.5% uptime SLA. The Premium Tier, which requires a minimum spend for enterprises, offers 99.9% uptime SLA along with single sign-on and private VPC links.
SourceQdrant: Are there dedicated cloud infrastructure options?
Yes, Qdrant offers Hybrid Cloud (runs on your infrastructure) and Private Cloud (complete isolation) options, both with custom pricing that requires contacting the sales team.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Dragonfly vs Valkey
- Dragonfly vs Memcached
- Dragonfly vs Readyset
- Dragonfly vs SingleStore
- Dragonfly vs Apache Druid
- Dragonfly vs TiDB
- Dragonfly vs ScyllaDB
- Dragonfly vs Firebolt
- Dragonfly vs QuestDB
- Dragonfly vs Amazon Aurora
- Dragonfly vs Couchbase
- Dragonfly vs turbopuffer
- Dragonfly vs Instaclustr
- Dragonfly vs Knack
- Dragonfly vs LanceDB
- Dragonfly vs Marqo
- Dragonfly vs Nile
- Dragonfly vs Ninox
- Dragonfly vs Zilliz
- Dragonfly vs Cockroach Labs
- Dragonfly vs PostgreSQL
- Dragonfly vs Airtable
- Dragonfly vs Chroma
- Dragonfly vs Vespa
- Dragonfly vs YugabyteDB
- Dragonfly vs NATS
- Dragonfly vs Elasticsearch
- Dragonfly vs Grist
- Dragonfly vs IBM Db2
- Qdrant vs Valkey
- Qdrant vs Memcached
- Qdrant vs Readyset
- Qdrant vs SingleStore
- Qdrant vs Apache Druid
- Qdrant vs TiDB
- Qdrant vs ScyllaDB
- Qdrant vs Firebolt
- Qdrant vs QuestDB
- Qdrant vs Amazon Aurora
- Qdrant vs Couchbase
- Qdrant vs turbopuffer
- Qdrant vs Instaclustr
- Qdrant vs Knack
- Qdrant vs LanceDB
- Qdrant vs Marqo
- Qdrant vs Nile
- Qdrant vs Ninox
- Qdrant vs Zilliz
- Qdrant vs Cockroach Labs
- Qdrant vs PostgreSQL
- Qdrant vs Airtable
- Qdrant vs Chroma
- Qdrant vs Vespa
- Qdrant vs YugabyteDB
- Qdrant vs NATS
- Qdrant vs Elasticsearch
- Qdrant vs Grist
- Qdrant vs IBM Db2
