Cybersecurity · head to head
Diligent vs Windscribe

Diligent
Cybersecurity
Board management and enterprise GRC platform assembled from Galvanize, Steele and Diligent Boards
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Windscribe
Cybersecurity
VPN and firewall service with a generous free data tier and a customizable Build-A-Plan option
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Windscribe has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Diligent the platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.; Windscribe free tier's 10GB cap still requires email confirmation and social sharing to unlock, unlike some no-strings-attached competitors.
- They diverge on capability: Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Windscribe covers Firewall / default block.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Diligent and Windscribe actually diverge.
| Attribute | Diligent | Windscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows | windows, mac, linux, ios, android, web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Diligent
- Diligent Boards
- Entity management
- Audit and analytics
- Risk management
- Third-party risk
- Ethics and compliance
- ESG and sustainability
- Market intelligence
Only in Windscribe
- Firewall / default block
- Unlimited simultaneous devices
- Build-A-Plan
- R.O.B.E.R.T. content blocker
- Static IP and port forwarding add-ons
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Diligent
- A listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance systemnot Windscribe
- An internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the ACL heritage analytics enginenot Windscribe
- A regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement findingnot Windscribe
- A group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reportingnot Windscribe
Windscribe
- Running a free VPN across unlimited personal devicesnot Diligent
- Buying access to just a few specific server locations cheaplynot Diligent
- Blocking ads and trackers at the DNS level while browsingnot Diligent
- Preventing IP leaks with a default-block firewall rulenot Diligent
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Diligent
- The platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- Pricing is unpublished and consistently at the top of the market, and organisations that need only one capability, a board portal or an audit analytics tool, generally pay less and get more from a specialist.
- Renewal leverage is weak once the board portal is embedded, because directors are the least willing user group to be migrated and that dependency is well understood by the vendor at renewal time.
- The analytics engine expects real data skills, and audit teams without an analytics-capable member typically use a fraction of what they licensed while paying for all of it.
- Module-by-module implementation means the promised single view of governance and risk usually arrives years after the first purchase, if the later modules are ever funded.
Windscribe
- Free tier's 10GB cap still requires email confirmation and social sharing to unlock, unlike some no-strings-attached competitors.
- Build-A-Plan's low cost only covers selected locations, so broad global coverage still requires the full Pro plan.
- Server speeds and streaming reliability are inconsistent compared to larger premium VPN providers.
- Customer support is primarily ticket/community-based rather than live chat for lower tiers.
Pricing, plan by plan
Diligent
On request- Diligent One Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by module and user count
- Board portal seats priced separately from GRC modules
- Annual subscription, commonly multi-year
Windscribe
Free- FreeFree
- 10GB of data per month with confirmed email
- 10 server countries
- Unlimited devices
- Build-A-Plan$3/month
- Pay per selected server location ($1/location)
- $3 minimum purchase
- Unlimited data on selected locations
- Pro$9/month
- Unlimited data
- 69+ countries
- $69/year on annual billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Diligent if
- You need diligent boards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want entity management.
Choose Windscribe if
- You need firewall / default block.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android, web.
- You also want unlimited simultaneous devices.
Questions people ask
- Is Diligent or Windscribe better?
- Neither clearly leads. Diligent starts at On request and Windscribe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Diligent or Windscribe?
- Windscribe has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Diligent and Free for Windscribe.
- Does Diligent or Windscribe run on more platforms?
- Diligent runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows. Windscribe runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android, web.
- Can I use Windscribe for free?
- Yes. Windscribe has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Diligent starts at On request.
- What is Diligent best used for?
- Diligent is most often used for a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system, an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine, a regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement finding, a group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reporting. Of those, a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system and an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine are not what Windscribe is typically brought in for.
- What can Diligent do that Windscribe cannot?
- Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Entity management, Audit and analytics, Risk management. Windscribe covers Firewall / default block, Unlimited simultaneous devices, Build-A-Plan, R.O.B.E.R.T. content blocker.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Diligent: Is Diligent One the same product as Galvanize?
It contains it. Diligent bought Galvanize, the ACL and Rsam merger, for around one billion dollars in April 2021, and its audit analytics and risk modules are that heritage rebranded into Diligent One.
Diligent: What does Diligent cost?
Not published. It is quoted by module and user, and board portal seats are priced differently from GRC seats. Expect an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement.
Diligent: Can you buy just the board portal?
Yes, Diligent Boards is sold on its own and is the most common entry point. The GRC modules are separate purchases.
Diligent: Does it replace a SOC 2 automation tool?
No. Diligent is aimed at enterprise audit, risk and governance, not at automated evidence collection for security certifications.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Diligent vs LogicManager
- Diligent vs Resolver
- Diligent vs MetricStream
- Diligent vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Diligent vs Transcend
- Diligent vs OneTrust
- Diligent vs Milestone XProtect
- Diligent vs Camio
- Diligent vs Delinea
- Diligent vs Dahua Technology
- Diligent vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Diligent vs IBM QRadar
- Diligent vs Trivy
- Diligent vs Trulioo
- Diligent vs Unit21
- Diligent vs Veracode
- Diligent vs Very Good Security
- Diligent vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Diligent vs TunnelBear
- Diligent vs Private Internet Access
- Diligent vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Diligent vs Surfshark
- Diligent vs Mullvad VPN
- Diligent vs Avast One
- Diligent vs CyberGhost VPN
- Diligent vs IVPN
- Diligent vs NordVPN
- Diligent vs ProtonVPN
- Diligent vs Osano
- Diligent vs Syft
- Diligent vs ThetaRay
- Diligent vs ExpressVPN
- Windscribe vs LogicManager
- Windscribe vs Resolver
- Windscribe vs MetricStream
- Windscribe vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Windscribe vs Transcend
- Windscribe vs OneTrust
- Windscribe vs Milestone XProtect
- Windscribe vs Camio
- Windscribe vs Delinea
- Windscribe vs Dahua Technology
- Windscribe vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Windscribe vs IBM QRadar
- Windscribe vs Trivy
- Windscribe vs Trulioo
- Windscribe vs Unit21
- Windscribe vs Veracode
- Windscribe vs Very Good Security
- Windscribe vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Windscribe vs TunnelBear
- Windscribe vs Private Internet Access
- Windscribe vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Windscribe vs Surfshark
- Windscribe vs Mullvad VPN
- Windscribe vs Avast One
- Windscribe vs CyberGhost VPN
- Windscribe vs IVPN
- Windscribe vs NordVPN
- Windscribe vs ProtonVPN
- Windscribe vs Osano
- Windscribe vs Syft
- Windscribe vs ThetaRay
- Windscribe vs ExpressVPN
