Software · head to head
Devin vs Linear

Devin
Software
Autonomous AI software engineer planning and executing code in its own environment
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Linear has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Devin pricing not published; specific costs and plan tiers require signup or contact with sales; Linear no task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Devin and Linear actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Devin
Nothing recorded that Linear does not also cover.
Only in Linear
- Fast, real-time sync
- Keyboard-first design
- Automatic issue tracking
- Cycles (sprints)
- Projects & milestones
- Custom workflows
- API & webhooks
- Built-in roadmaps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Devin
- Feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebasesnot Linear
- Code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositoriesnot Linear
- Bug fixing and debugging with test-driven verificationnot Linear
- Rapid prototyping and proof-of-concept developmentnot Linear
- Repetitive implementation tasks freeing human engineers for complex designnot Linear
Linear
- Issue management and triage, converting customer feedback into prioritized issuesnot Devin
- Strategic planning via initiatives, roadmaps, and PRDs from idea to launchnot Devin
- Agent-assisted development, with agents drafting docs and submitting pull requestsnot Devin
- Code review with structural diffs for human and agent outputnot Devin
- Progress monitoring via dashboards tracking cycle times and project healthnot Devin
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Devin
- Pricing not published; specific costs and plan tiers require signup or contact with sales
- Cannot handle extremely difficult tasks reliably; success rate decreases with task complexity
- Requires clear, well-scoped task descriptions; ambiguous requirements reduce effectiveness
- Requires human oversight and integration into existing workflows; not fully autonomous
Linear
- No task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
- No native time-tracking or hour-logging feature
- No native Linux desktop app; official FAQ states it 'may come in the future but it's not on the roadmap for now'
- Free tier capped at 250 issues and 2 teams
Pricing, plan by plan
Devin
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Devin review.
Linear
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited members
- 2 teams
- 250 issues
- Basic$10/month
- 5 teams
- Unlimited issues
- Unlimited file uploads
- Business$16/month
- Unlimited teams
- Private teams/guests
- Triage Intelligence
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- SAML/SCIM
- Granular admin controls
- Invoice/PO billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Linear if
- You need fast, real-time sync.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- You also want keyboard-first design.
Questions people ask
- Is Devin or Linear better?
- Neither clearly leads. Devin starts at On request and Linear at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Devin or Linear?
- Linear has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Devin and Free for Linear.
- Does Devin or Linear run on more platforms?
- Devin runs on Desktop, Windsurf integration, Web. Linear runs on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Linear for free?
- Yes. Linear has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Devin starts at On request.
- What is Devin best used for?
- Devin is most often used for feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebases, code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositories, bug fixing and debugging with test-driven verification, rapid prototyping and proof-of-concept development. Of those, feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebases and code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositories are not what Linear is typically brought in for.
- What can Devin do that Linear cannot?
- Linear covers Fast, real-time sync, Keyboard-first design, Automatic issue tracking, Cycles (sprints).
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Devin vs Windsurf
- Devin vs Zed
- Devin vs Cursor
- Devin vs Amp
- Devin vs Augment Code
- Devin vs Baseten
- Devin vs Braintrust
- Devin vs Bun
- Devin vs Cline
- Devin vs Factory
- Devin vs Humanloop
- Devin vs Langfuse
- Devin vs LangSmith
- Devin vs Qodo
- Devin vs Val Town
- Devin vs Asana
- Devin vs ClickUp
- Devin vs Figma
- Devin vs Monday.com
- Devin vs Greenhouse
- Devin vs Notion
- Devin vs Amplitude
- Devin vs Datadog
- Devin vs PostHog
- Devin vs PyCharm
- Devin vs Sketch
- Devin vs Docker
- Devin vs Netlify
- Devin vs Okta
- Devin vs Aha!
- Devin vs Coda
- Devin vs Dashlane
- Devin vs GitHub
- Linear vs Windsurf
- Linear vs Zed
- Linear vs Cursor
- Linear vs Amp
- Linear vs Augment Code
- Linear vs Baseten
- Linear vs Braintrust
- Linear vs Bun
- Linear vs Cline
- Linear vs Factory
- Linear vs Humanloop
- Linear vs Langfuse
- Linear vs LangSmith
- Linear vs Qodo
- Linear vs Val Town
- Linear vs Asana
- Linear vs ClickUp
- Linear vs Figma
- Linear vs Monday.com
- Linear vs Greenhouse
- Linear vs Notion
- Linear vs Amplitude
- Linear vs Datadog
- Linear vs PostHog
- Linear vs PyCharm
- Linear vs Sketch
- Linear vs Docker
- Linear vs Netlify
- Linear vs Okta
- Linear vs Aha!
- Linear vs Coda
- Linear vs Dashlane
- Linear vs GitHub

