Software · head to head
Augment Code vs Linear
Augment Code
Software
Agentic software development at organizational scale
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Linear has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Augment Code the $100 per month Business plan pools LLM inference, context engine and compute usage together and adds a 40 percent service fee on top of the provider's public API price, as of August 2026.; Linear no task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Augment Code and Linear actually diverge.
| Attribute | Augment Code | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows |
| Founded | Unknown | 2019 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Augment Code
Nothing recorded that Linear does not also cover.
Only in Linear
- Fast, real-time sync
- Keyboard-first design
- Automatic issue tracking
- Cycles (sprints)
- Projects & milestones
- Custom workflows
- API & webhooks
- Built-in roadmaps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Augment Code
No use cases recorded yet. See the Augment Code review.
Linear
- Issue management and triage, converting customer feedback into prioritized issuesnot Augment Code
- Strategic planning via initiatives, roadmaps, and PRDs from idea to launchnot Augment Code
- Agent-assisted development, with agents drafting docs and submitting pull requestsnot Augment Code
- Code review with structural diffs for human and agent outputnot Augment Code
- Progress monitoring via dashboards tracking cycle times and project healthnot Augment Code
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Augment Code
- The $100 per month Business plan pools LLM inference, context engine and compute usage together and adds a 40 percent service fee on top of the provider's public API price, as of August 2026.
Linear
- No task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
- No native time-tracking or hour-logging feature
- No native Linux desktop app; official FAQ states it 'may come in the future but it's not on the roadmap for now'
- Free tier capped at 250 issues and 2 teams
Pricing, plan by plan
Augment Code
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Augment Code review.
Linear
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited members
- 2 teams
- 250 issues
- Basic$10/month
- 5 teams
- Unlimited issues
- Unlimited file uploads
- Business$16/month
- Unlimited teams
- Private teams/guests
- Triage Intelligence
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- SAML/SCIM
- Granular admin controls
- Invoice/PO billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Augment Code if
Nothing in the data separates Augment Code from Linear on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Linear if
- You need fast, real-time sync.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- You also want keyboard-first design.
Questions people ask
- Is Augment Code or Linear better?
- Neither clearly leads. Augment Code starts at On request and Linear at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Augment Code or Linear?
- Linear has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Augment Code and Free for Linear.
- Does Augment Code or Linear run on more platforms?
- Augment Code runs on Web. Linear runs on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Linear for free?
- Yes. Linear has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Augment Code starts at On request.
- What can Augment Code do that Linear cannot?
- Linear covers Fast, real-time sync, Keyboard-first design, Automatic issue tracking, Cycles (sprints).
Related pages
More on Augment Code
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Augment Code vs Windsurf
- Augment Code vs Zed
- Augment Code vs Cursor
- Augment Code vs Amp
- Augment Code vs Baseten
- Augment Code vs Braintrust
- Augment Code vs Bun
- Augment Code vs Cline
- Augment Code vs Devin
- Augment Code vs Factory
- Augment Code vs Humanloop
- Augment Code vs Langfuse
- Augment Code vs LangSmith
- Augment Code vs Qodo
- Augment Code vs Val Town
- Augment Code vs Asana
- Augment Code vs ClickUp
- Augment Code vs Figma
- Augment Code vs Monday.com
- Augment Code vs Greenhouse
- Augment Code vs Notion
- Augment Code vs Amplitude
- Augment Code vs Datadog
- Augment Code vs PostHog
- Augment Code vs PyCharm
- Augment Code vs Sketch
- Augment Code vs Docker
- Augment Code vs Netlify
- Augment Code vs Okta
- Augment Code vs Aha!
- Augment Code vs Coda
- Augment Code vs Dashlane
- Augment Code vs GitHub
- Linear vs Windsurf
- Linear vs Zed
- Linear vs Cursor
- Linear vs Amp
- Linear vs Baseten
- Linear vs Braintrust
- Linear vs Bun
- Linear vs Cline
- Linear vs Devin
- Linear vs Factory
- Linear vs Humanloop
- Linear vs Langfuse
- Linear vs LangSmith
- Linear vs Qodo
- Linear vs Val Town
- Linear vs Asana
- Linear vs ClickUp
- Linear vs Figma
- Linear vs Monday.com
- Linear vs Greenhouse
- Linear vs Notion
- Linear vs Amplitude
- Linear vs Datadog
- Linear vs PostHog
- Linear vs PyCharm
- Linear vs Sketch
- Linear vs Docker
- Linear vs Netlify
- Linear vs Okta
- Linear vs Aha!
- Linear vs Coda
- Linear vs Dashlane
- Linear vs GitHub

