Softwr

Logistics · head to head

Deposco vs FourKites

Deposco logo

Deposco

Logistics

Cloud warehouse and order management for fulfilment operations

From
On request
Rated
-
FourKites logo

FourKites

Maritime

Real-time supply chain visibility

From
$2000/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Deposco pricing is entirely quote-based, and the annual figure puts it out of reach for smaller operations that its marketing sometimes attracts; FourKites no pricing plans or costs published. FourKites operates an Outcome-as-a-Service model and does not publish standard seat-based pricing
  • They diverge on capability: Deposco covers Warehouse management, FourKites covers Real-time tracking.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Deposco and FourKites actually diverge.

Attributes where Deposco and FourKites differ
AttributeDeposcoFourKites
Starting priceOn request$2000/month
Pricing modelquotesubscription
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, Ios, Android, Api
CategoryLogisticsMaritime
FoundedUnknown2014

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Deposco

  • Warehouse management
  • Order management
  • Inventory visibility
  • 3PL support
  • Wave and batch picking
  • Carrier integration

Only in FourKites

  • Real-time tracking
  • Predictive ETAs
  • Exception alerts
  • Yard management
  • TMS platforms
  • ERP systems
  • WMS
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Deposco

  • E-commerce operations whose warehouse process has become the growth constraintnot FourKites
  • Third-party logistics providers running multiple clients from shared facilitiesnot FourKites
  • Retailers unifying store and warehouse inventory for omnichannel fulfilmentnot FourKites
  • Companies needing real WMS capability without a multi-year enterprise implementationnot FourKites

FourKites

  • Automating carrier status inquiries in customer service chat and emailnot Deposco
  • Creating shipments automatically from supplier documents and linking to POsnot Deposco
  • Scheduling dock appointments and rescheduling based on shipment ETAsnot Deposco
  • Resolving shipment inquiry questions automatically without escalationnot Deposco
  • Collecting missing proof-of-delivery documents across multiple channelsnot Deposco

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Deposco

  • Pricing is entirely quote-based, and the annual figure puts it out of reach for smaller operations that its marketing sometimes attracts
  • Implementation is still a project with process design and integration work, even though it is shorter than the enterprise incumbents
  • Less established than Manhattan or Blue Yonder, which matters in procurement processes that weight vendor longevity
  • Deep manufacturing execution is outside its scope, so operations needing both will run two systems
  • Reference customers cluster in retail and 3PL, so unusual verticals should ask hard questions about fit

FourKites

  • No pricing plans or costs published. FourKites operates an Outcome-as-a-Service model and does not publish standard seat-based pricing
  • Pricing requires direct contact with sales and personalized consultation

Pricing, plan by plan

Deposco

On request
  • Bright Suite$undefined/year
    • Warehouse management
    • Order management
    • Inventory visibility

FourKites

$2000/month
  • Professional$5000/month
    • Multi-modal tracking
    • Predictive ETAs
    • Analytics

Which should you pick?

Choose Deposco if

  • You need warehouse management.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want order management.

Choose FourKites if

  • You need real-time tracking.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want predictive etas.

Questions people ask

Is Deposco or FourKites better?
Neither clearly leads. Deposco starts at On request and FourKites at $2000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Deposco or FourKites?
Deposco starts at On request and FourKites at $2000/month.
Does Deposco or FourKites run on more platforms?
Deposco runs on Web, iOS, Android. FourKites runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
What is Deposco best used for?
Deposco is most often used for e-commerce operations whose warehouse process has become the growth constraint, third-party logistics providers running multiple clients from shared facilities, retailers unifying store and warehouse inventory for omnichannel fulfilment, companies needing real wms capability without a multi-year enterprise implementation. Of those, e-commerce operations whose warehouse process has become the growth constraint and third-party logistics providers running multiple clients from shared facilities are not what FourKites is typically brought in for.
What can Deposco do that FourKites cannot?
Deposco covers Warehouse management, Order management, Inventory visibility, 3PL support. FourKites covers Real-time tracking, Predictive ETAs, Exception alerts, Yard management.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Deposco: What does Deposco cost?

Not published. It is an annual contract quoted on volume, sites and modules, and it is priced as enterprise software rather than as a per-user SaaS tool.

FourKites: What is FourKites' pricing model?

FourKites operates an Outcome-as-a-Service model rather than traditional seat-based pricing. The company states: 'We do not sell seats. We replace work.'

Source
Deposco: How does it compare to Manhattan or Blue Yonder?

Comparable warehouse capability with a shorter implementation and lower entry cost. The incumbents are ahead on the largest and most complex networks.

FourKites: How do I get FourKites pricing?

FourKites does not publish pricing on their website. Customers must contact their sales team through 'Talk to an Outcome Advisor' calls-to-action or contact forms to discuss implementation and pricing.

Source
Deposco: Is it suitable for 3PL?

Yes, explicitly. Multi-client warehousing with per-client billing is a first-class capability rather than an adaptation.

Deposco: Does it replace an ERP?

No. It handles warehouse and order execution and integrates with NetSuite, SAP and similar for finance and broader business processes.

Deposco: When do companies buy it?

Usually when order volume has outgrown a basic inventory tool and the warehouse itself has become the bottleneck. Below that point it is more system than the operation needs.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads