Developer Tools · head to head
Deno vs Orca Security

Deno
Developer Tools
A fast, open-source, fully Node-compatible JS runtime with TypeScript baked right in
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Orca Security
Cloud
Agentless cloud-native application protection platform for code-to-runtime security.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Deno has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Deno egress bandwidth overage costs $0.20/GB which can become expensive for high-traffic applications; Orca Security no public pricing; requires a demo and custom quote from sales.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Deno and Orca Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Deno | Orca Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | web, api |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Deno
Nothing recorded that Orca Security does not also cover.
Only in Orca Security
- Agentless cloud scanning
- Attack path analysis
- Shadow AI detection
- Secure code development
- Alert prioritization
- Workload protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Deno
- Running TypeScript natively without transpilation overheadnot Orca Security
- Migrating Node.js applications to secure-by-default runtimenot Orca Security
- Deploying edge functions and serverless containers seamlesslynot Orca Security
- Consolidating developer tools into single binarynot Orca Security
Orca Security
- Gaining full cloud asset visibility without deploying agentsnot Deno
- Prioritizing cloud risk with attack path correlationnot Deno
- Detecting shadow AI usage across cloud environmentsnot Deno
- Scanning code, containers, and IaC before deploymentnot Deno
- Reducing alert fatigue through contextual risk scoringnot Deno
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Deno
- Egress bandwidth overage costs $0.20/GB which can become expensive for high-traffic applications
- CPU time overage is $0.10/hour on Pro and Builder tiers, adding to costs for compute-intensive workloads
- Enterprise pricing is not disclosed; requires sales contact
Orca Security
- No public pricing; requires a demo and custom quote from sales.
- Agentless-only scanning may miss some runtime telemetry that agent-based tools capture.
- Full value depends on integrating many of the platform's modules across code, cloud, and AI.
- Primarily targeted at mid-to-large organizations with multi-cloud environments.
Pricing, plan by plan
Deno
Free- FreeFree
- 1 million requests/month
- 20GB egress bandwidth
- 10 apps
- Pro$20/month
- 5 million requests/month
- 200GB egress
- 50 apps
- Builder$200/month
- 25 million requests/month
- 2,000GB egress
- 10,000 apps
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom limits on all metrics
- 99.95% reliability SLA
- Email support with SLA
Orca Security
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Orca Security review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Orca Security if
- You need agentless cloud scanning.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want attack path analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Deno or Orca Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Deno starts at Free and Orca Security at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Deno or Orca Security?
- Deno has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Deno and On request for Orca Security.
- Does Deno or Orca Security run on more platforms?
- Deno runs on Web. Orca Security runs on web, api.
- Can I use Deno for free?
- Yes. Deno has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Orca Security starts at On request.
- What is Deno best used for?
- Deno is most often used for running typescript natively without transpilation overhead, migrating node.js applications to secure-by-default runtime, deploying edge functions and serverless containers seamlessly, consolidating developer tools into single binary. Of those, running typescript natively without transpilation overhead and migrating node.js applications to secure-by-default runtime are not what Orca Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Deno do that Orca Security cannot?
- Orca Security covers Agentless cloud scanning, Attack path analysis, Shadow AI detection, Secure code development.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Deno: How much does Deno Deploy cost?
Deno Deploy offers a free tier at $0/month, Pro at $20/month, and Builder at $200/month. Enterprise has custom pricing. All plans include base request and bandwidth limits, with overage charges for additional usage.
SourceOrca Security: How much does Orca Security cost?
Orca Security does not publish pricing tiers or rates on their website. Organizations must contact Orca Security directly or request a demo to receive custom pricing information based on their specific use case and requirements.
SourceDeno: What are Deno Deploy's overage charges?
Egress bandwidth overages cost $0.20 per GB. CPU time overages are $0.10 per hour on Pro and Builder tiers. Memory time and KV database operations also incur charges beyond included limits.
SourceDeno: How many apps can I deploy on Deno's free plan?
The free tier includes 10 apps with up to 1 concurrent build. Pro tier supports 50 apps with 3 concurrent builds, and Builder supports 10,000 apps with 20 concurrent builds.
SourceDeno: How many team members can access Deno Deploy?
The free tier supports up to 3 team members. Pro supports 10 team members. Builder supports 25 team members. Enterprise has custom seat limits.
SourceRelated pages
More on Orca Security
Other head to heads
- Deno vs Turborepo
- Deno vs ESLint
- Deno vs pnpm
- Deno vs Visual Studio Code
- Deno vs Jitsu
- Deno vs Argo CD
- Deno vs Git
- Deno vs Soketi
- Deno vs Bazel
- Deno vs Pants Build
- Deno vs Tilt
- Deno vs Dagger
- Deno vs RAD Studio
- Deno vs Refact
- Deno vs Restate
- Deno vs RubyMine
- Deno vs SonarQube
- Deno vs Wiz
- Deno vs Akamai
- Deno vs Fly.io
- Deno vs Northflank
- Deno vs Encore
- Deno vs Pulumi
- Deno vs Portworx
- Deno vs Anyscale
- Deno vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Deno vs Heroku
- Deno vs Beam Cloud
- Deno vs Cerebrium
- Deno vs Longhorn
- Deno vs Oracle Cloud
- Deno vs Packer
- Deno vs minikube
- Deno vs OpenTelemetry
- Orca Security vs Turborepo
- Orca Security vs ESLint
- Orca Security vs pnpm
- Orca Security vs Visual Studio Code
- Orca Security vs Jitsu
- Orca Security vs Argo CD
- Orca Security vs Git
- Orca Security vs Soketi
- Orca Security vs Bazel
- Orca Security vs Pants Build
- Orca Security vs Tilt
- Orca Security vs Dagger
- Orca Security vs RAD Studio
- Orca Security vs Refact
- Orca Security vs Restate
- Orca Security vs RubyMine
- Orca Security vs SonarQube
- Orca Security vs Wiz
- Orca Security vs Akamai
- Orca Security vs Fly.io
- Orca Security vs Northflank
- Orca Security vs Encore
- Orca Security vs Pulumi
- Orca Security vs Portworx
- Orca Security vs Anyscale
- Orca Security vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Orca Security vs Heroku
- Orca Security vs Beam Cloud
- Orca Security vs Cerebrium
- Orca Security vs Longhorn
- Orca Security vs Oracle Cloud
- Orca Security vs Packer
- Orca Security vs minikube
- Orca Security vs OpenTelemetry
