Developer Tools · head to head
Deno vs Evidence
Deno
Developer Tools
A fast, open-source, fully Node-compatible JS runtime with TypeScript baked right in
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Evidence
Business Intelligence
Business intelligence as code for teams and AI agents
- From
- $2500/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Deno has a free plan, then $20/mo; Evidence starts at $2500/mo.
- Where Deno falls short: egress bandwidth overage costs $0.20/GB which can become expensive for high-traffic applications.
- Where Evidence falls short: high starting price at $2,500/month limits small team adoption.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Deno and Evidence actually diverge.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Deno
Nothing recorded that Evidence does not also cover.
Only in Evidence
- Analytics Agent
- Code-based infrastructure
- Development environment
- Visualization tools
- Embedded analytics
- Enterprise security
- Multi-channel access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Deno
- Running TypeScript natively without transpilation overheadnot Evidence
- Migrating Node.js applications to secure-by-default runtimenot Evidence
- Deploying edge functions and serverless containers seamlesslynot Evidence
- Consolidating developer tools into single binarynot Evidence
Evidence
- Building version-controlled analytics infrastructurenot Deno
- Enabling AI agents to answer business questionsnot Deno
- Delivering analytics through multiple channels (web, Slack, ChatGPT)not Deno
- Embedding white-labeled analytics in productsnot Deno
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Deno
- Egress bandwidth overage costs $0.20/GB which can become expensive for high-traffic applications
- CPU time overage is $0.10/hour on Pro and Builder tiers, adding to costs for compute-intensive workloads
- Enterprise pricing is not disclosed; requires sales contact
Evidence
- High starting price at $2,500/month limits small team adoption
- No freemium option for evaluation or learning
- Code-based approach has steeper learning curve than visual tools
- AI credits limited on Team plan; additional credits cost extra
- Requires Git workflow familiarity for effective collaboration
Pricing, plan by plan
Deno
Free- FreeFree
- 1 million requests/month
- 20GB egress bandwidth
- 10 apps
- Pro$20/mo
- 5 million requests/month
- 200GB egress
- 50 apps
- Builder$200/mo
- 25 million requests/month
- 2,000GB egress
- 10,000 apps
- EnterpriseOn request
- Custom limits on all metrics
- 99.95% reliability SLA
- Email support with SLA
Evidence
$2500/month- Team$2,500/mo
- Unlimited users
- Monthly billing
- Analytics Agent
- EnterpriseOn request
- All Team features
- SSO/SAML authentication
- SCIM directory sync
Which should you pick?
Choose Evidence if
- You need analytics agent.
- You work on Web, Embedded.
- You also want code-based infrastructure.
Questions people ask
- Is Deno or Evidence better?
- Neither clearly leads. Deno starts at Free and Evidence at $2500/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Deno or Evidence?
- Deno has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Deno and $2500/month for Evidence.
- Does Deno or Evidence run on more platforms?
- Deno runs on Web. Evidence runs on Web, Embedded.
- Can I use Deno for free?
- Yes. Deno has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Evidence starts at $2500/month.
- What is Deno best used for?
- Deno is most often used for running typescript natively without transpilation overhead, migrating node.js applications to secure-by-default runtime, deploying edge functions and serverless containers seamlessly, consolidating developer tools into single binary. Of those, running typescript natively without transpilation overhead and migrating node.js applications to secure-by-default runtime are not what Evidence is typically brought in for.
- What can Deno do that Evidence cannot?
- Evidence covers Analytics Agent, Code-based infrastructure, Development environment, Visualization tools.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Deno: How much does Deno Deploy cost?
Deno Deploy offers a free tier at $0/month, Pro at $20/month, and Builder at $200/month. Enterprise has custom pricing. All plans include base request and bandwidth limits, with overage charges for additional usage.
SourceEvidence: Does Evidence have per-user pricing?
No, Evidence offers one flat price for unlimited users at $2,500/month on the Team plan with a 30-day free trial.
SourceDeno: What are Deno Deploy's overage charges?
Egress bandwidth overages cost $0.20 per GB. CPU time overages are $0.10 per hour on Pro and Builder tiers. Memory time and KV database operations also incur charges beyond included limits.
SourceEvidence: How many AI credits come with Team plan?
Team plan includes 20,000 AI credits monthly at $0.01 per additional credit. Enterprise offers custom credit packages.
SourceDeno: How many apps can I deploy on Deno's free plan?
The free tier includes 10 apps with up to 1 concurrent build. Pro tier supports 50 apps with 3 concurrent builds, and Builder supports 10,000 apps with 20 concurrent builds.
SourceEvidence: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise adds SSO/SAML, SCIM directory sync, row-level access rules, embedding capabilities, and custom deployment options at custom pricing.
SourceDeno: How many team members can access Deno Deploy?
The free tier supports up to 3 team members. Pro supports 10 team members. Builder supports 25 team members. Enterprise has custom seat limits.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Deno vs Jitsu
- Deno vs WebStorm
- Deno vs Turborepo
- Deno vs Argo CD
- Deno vs Frappe
- Deno vs Git
- Deno vs Restate
- Deno vs Soketi
- Deno vs LaunchDarkly
- Deno vs Sublime Text
- Deno vs Vite
- Deno vs Bazel
- Deno vs Hookdeck
- Deno vs Istio
- Deno vs JFrog Artifactory
- Deno vs Namespace
- Deno vs Nix
- Deno vs Nixpacks
- Deno vs Cube
- Deno vs Zenlytic
- Deno vs Hex
- Deno vs Fabi
- Deno vs Phocas
- Deno vs Rill Data
- Deno vs PostHog
- Deno vs Mixpanel
- Deno vs GoodData
- Deno vs Grow
- Deno vs Sisense
- Deno vs MicroStrategy
- Deno vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Deno vs Snowplow
- Deno vs Stripe Dashboard
- Deno vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Deno vs Yellowfin
- Deno vs Zebra BI
- Evidence vs Jitsu
- Evidence vs WebStorm
- Evidence vs Turborepo
- Evidence vs Argo CD
- Evidence vs Frappe
- Evidence vs Git
- Evidence vs Restate
- Evidence vs Soketi
- Evidence vs LaunchDarkly
- Evidence vs Sublime Text
- Evidence vs Vite
- Evidence vs Bazel
- Evidence vs Hookdeck
- Evidence vs Istio
- Evidence vs JFrog Artifactory
- Evidence vs Namespace
- Evidence vs Nix
- Evidence vs Nixpacks
- Evidence vs Cube
- Evidence vs Zenlytic
- Evidence vs Hex
- Evidence vs Fabi
- Evidence vs Phocas
- Evidence vs Rill Data
- Evidence vs PostHog
- Evidence vs Mixpanel
- Evidence vs GoodData
- Evidence vs Grow
- Evidence vs Sisense
- Evidence vs MicroStrategy
- Evidence vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Evidence vs Snowplow
- Evidence vs Stripe Dashboard
- Evidence vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Evidence vs Yellowfin
- Evidence vs Zebra BI