Cybersecurity · head to head
Delinea vs IBM QRadar

Delinea
Cybersecurity
Privileged access management from the merged Thycotic and Centrify
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Delinea the Thycotic and Centrify lineages are integrated unevenly, so buying the full portfolio means running consoles and agents that do not share one administrative model as cleanly as the marketing suggests.; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: Delinea covers Secret Server, IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Delinea and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Delinea | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, Linux, macOS | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 1911 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Delinea
- Secret Server
- Privileged session recording
- Privilege Manager
- Server PAM
- Discovery
- DevOps secrets
- Behaviour analytics
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Delinea
- An organisation whose cyber insurer now requires privileged credentials to be vaulted and rotatednot IBM QRadar
- A mid-market IT team that abandoned a heavier PAM rollout and needs a vault that can be in production in weeksnot IBM QRadar
- A company removing local administrator rights from every workstation after a ransomware incidentnot IBM QRadar
- An audit finding that shared service account passwords are stored in a spreadsheet and used by contractorsnot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Delinea
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Delinea
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Delinea
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Delinea
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Delinea
- The Thycotic and Centrify lineages are integrated unevenly, so buying the full portfolio means running consoles and agents that do not share one administrative model as cleanly as the marketing suggests.
- Modules are licensed separately by different units, per privileged user for the vault and per endpoint for privilege management, which makes total cost hard to model and easy to underestimate at scale.
- Delinea does not publish rates, so buyers benchmark against third party and public sector listings; expect list prices to be negotiable by a wide margin, which means the first quote is not the price.
- Thoma Bravo ownership since 2021 has coincided with firmer renewal pricing, and buyers with a single-vendor PAM estate have little leverage once credentials are inside the vault.
- Migrating out of a privileged access vault is a genuinely hard project because every automated process that fetches a secret has to be repointed, so the switching cost is real and the vendor knows it.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
Delinea
On request- Secret Server$undefined/year
- Priced per privileged user, tiered by edition
- Cloud or on premises deployment
- Session recording in higher editions
- Privilege Manager$undefined/year
- Priced per endpoint
- Local admin rights removal and application elevation
- Licensed separately from Secret Server
- Server PAM$undefined/year
- Priced per managed server or per privileged user
- Just-in-time server access
- Licensed separately
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose Delinea if
- You need secret server.
- You work on Web, Windows, Linux, macOS.
- You also want privileged session recording.
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Delinea or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Delinea starts at On request and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Delinea or IBM QRadar?
- Delinea starts at On request and IBM QRadar at On request.
- Does Delinea or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- Delinea runs on Web, Windows, Linux, macOS. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- What is Delinea best used for?
- Delinea is most often used for an organisation whose cyber insurer now requires privileged credentials to be vaulted and rotated, a mid-market it team that abandoned a heavier pam rollout and needs a vault that can be in production in weeks, a company removing local administrator rights from every workstation after a ransomware incident, an audit finding that shared service account passwords are stored in a spreadsheet and used by contractors. Of those, an organisation whose cyber insurer now requires privileged credentials to be vaulted and rotated and a mid-market it team that abandoned a heavier pam rollout and needs a vault that can be in production in weeks are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can Delinea do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- Delinea covers Secret Server, Privileged session recording, Privilege Manager, Server PAM. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Delinea: Is Delinea the same as Thycotic?
Delinea is the merged company formed from Thycotic and Centrify in 2021. Secret Server is the former Thycotic product; the server access products come from Centrify.
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Delinea: Is pricing published?
Not by Delinea. Public sector frameworks have listed Secret Server Cloud around 348 GBP per user per year, which is a reference point, not a quote.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Delinea: Does one licence cover endpoints and servers?
No. Secret Server, Privilege Manager and Server PAM are separately licensed on different units. Scope all three if your requirement spans them.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Delinea vs One Identity
- Delinea vs Saviynt
- Delinea vs HashiCorp Vault
- Delinea vs 1Password
- Delinea vs BeyondTrust
- Delinea vs Infisical
- Delinea vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Delinea vs Akeyless
- Delinea vs Keeper Password Manager
- Delinea vs Legit Security
- Delinea vs Teleport
- Delinea vs Doppler
- Delinea vs ProtonVPN
- Delinea vs Resolver
- Delinea vs Securiti
- Delinea vs Sigstore
- Delinea vs Speakeasy
- Delinea vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Delinea vs Norton 360
- Delinea vs LastPass
- Delinea vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Delinea vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Delinea vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Delinea vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Delinea vs Recorded Future
- Delinea vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Delinea vs Proofpoint
- Delinea vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Delinea vs Arnica
- Delinea vs Authelia
- Delinea vs Authy
- Delinea vs Baffle
- Delinea vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs One Identity
- IBM QRadar vs Saviynt
- IBM QRadar vs HashiCorp Vault
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Infisical
- IBM QRadar vs HashiCorp Boundary
- IBM QRadar vs Akeyless
- IBM QRadar vs Keeper Password Manager
- IBM QRadar vs Legit Security
- IBM QRadar vs Teleport
- IBM QRadar vs Doppler
- IBM QRadar vs ProtonVPN
- IBM QRadar vs Resolver
- IBM QRadar vs Securiti
- IBM QRadar vs Sigstore
- IBM QRadar vs Speakeasy
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
