Software Development · head to head
DeepSource vs ESLint

DeepSource
Software Development
Automated code review and AI-powered code fixes for engineering teams.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DeepSource open Source plan caps at 1,000 reviewed pull requests and 1,000 formatting runs per month.; ESLint slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DeepSource and ESLint actually diverge.
| Attribute | DeepSource | ESLint |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | web, api | Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment |
| Category | Software Development | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2019 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DeepSource
- Automated pull request review
- AI-powered autofix
- Automated code formatting
- Monorepo support
- API and webhooks
- Bring-your-own-key AI
Only in ESLint
Nothing recorded that DeepSource does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DeepSource
- Automating pull request code review for engineering teamsnot ESLint
- Auto-fixing detected code issues with AInot ESLint
- Enforcing code formatting standards automaticallynot ESLint
- Scanning large monorepos for quality issuesnot ESLint
- Running self-hosted AI review in regulated environmentsnot ESLint
ESLint
- Statically analysing JavaScript and JSX to find problems before runtimenot DeepSource
- Automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewritesnot DeepSource
- Enforcing a consistent code style across a teamnot DeepSource
- Running as a CI step to block non-conforming codenot DeepSource
- Writing custom rules for project-specific conventionsnot DeepSource
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DeepSource
- Open Source plan caps at 1,000 reviewed pull requests and 1,000 formatting runs per month.
- AI Review beyond the included credit is billed per 10K lines of code, which can add unpredictable cost.
- Self-hosted deployment and BYOK AI are Enterprise-only features.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and requires contacting sales.
ESLint
- Slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome
- Complexity in configuration from scratch, particularly for TypeScript support
- Limited built-in TypeScript support, requiring separate parsers and coordination with new TypeScript features
Pricing, plan by plan
DeepSource
Free- Open SourceFree
- Free for public repositories
- 1,000 pull requests reviewed/month
- 1,000 automated formatting runs/month
- Team$24/month
- Unlimited repositories and pull request reviews
- $100 annual AI Review credit per user
- Monorepo support
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Self-hosted deployment
- Bring-your-own-key AI Review
- SSO
ESLint
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ESLint review.
Which should you pick?
Choose DeepSource if
- You need automated pull request review.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want ai-powered autofix.
Choose ESLint if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment.
Questions people ask
- Is DeepSource or ESLint better?
- Neither clearly leads. DeepSource starts at Free and ESLint at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DeepSource or ESLint?
- DeepSource starts at Free and ESLint at Free.
- Does DeepSource or ESLint run on more platforms?
- DeepSource runs on web, api. ESLint runs on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment.
- Can I use DeepSource for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is DeepSource best used for?
- DeepSource is most often used for automating pull request code review for engineering teams, auto-fixing detected code issues with ai, enforcing code formatting standards automatically, scanning large monorepos for quality issues. Of those, automating pull request code review for engineering teams and auto-fixing detected code issues with ai are not what ESLint is typically brought in for.
- What can DeepSource do that ESLint cannot?
- DeepSource covers Automated pull request review, AI-powered autofix, Automated code formatting, Monorepo support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DeepSource: What does DeepSource cost?
The Open Source plan is free for public repos; Team is $24 per user/month billed yearly with a $100 annual AI Review credit; Enterprise is custom-priced with self-hosted options.
SourceESLint: Does ESLint automatically fix code issues?
Many problems ESLint finds can be automatically fixed via the --fix flag. ESLint fixes are syntax-aware so you won't experience errors introduced by traditional find-and-replace algorithms.
SourceDeepSource: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes, the free Open Source plan covers public repositories with 1,000 pull requests reviewed per month and 1,000 automated formatting runs per month.
SourceESLint: How much does ESLint cost?
ESLint is completely free and open-source software maintained by the OpenJS Foundation. The project accepts voluntary donations from sponsors.
SourceDeepSource: How is AI Review usage metered?
Team plans include a $100 annual AI Review credit per user, with additional usage billed at Standard ($8/10K LOC) or Advanced ($15/10K LOC) tiers.
SourceESLint: Can I write custom ESLint rules?
Yes. You can develop custom rules that work alongside built-in functionality through ESLint's plugin system, allowing complete customization for your project needs.
SourceDeepSource: Can I change or cancel my plan?
Yes, subscriptions can be downgraded or canceled at any time.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- DeepSource vs Cursor
- DeepSource vs Windsurf
- DeepSource vs Zed
- DeepSource vs Amp
- DeepSource vs Braintrust
- DeepSource vs Codacy
- DeepSource vs Devin
- DeepSource vs SonarQube Cloud
- DeepSource vs Augment Code
- DeepSource vs Baseten
- DeepSource vs Drizzle ORM
- DeepSource vs Flagsmith
- DeepSource vs Unleash
- DeepSource vs Bun
- DeepSource vs Cline
- DeepSource vs Factory
- DeepSource vs Humanloop
- DeepSource vs Langfuse
- DeepSource vs Visual Studio Code
- DeepSource vs pnpm
- DeepSource vs Turborepo
- DeepSource vs GitHub Copilot
- DeepSource vs Penpot
- DeepSource vs Keycloak
- DeepSource vs Rust
- DeepSource vs CLion
- DeepSource vs GNAT Pro
- DeepSource vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- DeepSource vs GNU Emacs
- DeepSource vs Keil MDK
- DeepSource vs Vite
- DeepSource vs Bazel
- DeepSource vs CodeSandbox
- DeepSource vs Eclipse IDE
- DeepSource vs Moonrepo
- DeepSource vs Nx Cloud
- ESLint vs Cursor
- ESLint vs Windsurf
- ESLint vs Zed
- ESLint vs Amp
- ESLint vs Braintrust
- ESLint vs Codacy
- ESLint vs Devin
- ESLint vs SonarQube Cloud
- ESLint vs Augment Code
- ESLint vs Baseten
- ESLint vs Drizzle ORM
- ESLint vs Flagsmith
- ESLint vs Unleash
- ESLint vs Bun
- ESLint vs Cline
- ESLint vs Factory
- ESLint vs Humanloop
- ESLint vs Langfuse
- ESLint vs Visual Studio Code
- ESLint vs pnpm
- ESLint vs Turborepo
- ESLint vs GitHub Copilot
- ESLint vs Penpot
- ESLint vs Keycloak
- ESLint vs Rust
- ESLint vs CLion
- ESLint vs GNAT Pro
- ESLint vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- ESLint vs GNU Emacs
- ESLint vs Keil MDK
- ESLint vs Vite
- ESLint vs Bazel
- ESLint vs CodeSandbox
- ESLint vs Eclipse IDE
- ESLint vs Moonrepo
- ESLint vs Nx Cloud

