Technology · head to head
Datadog vs Grype

Grype
Cybersecurity
Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Grype has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Datadog consumption-based pricing model makes costs hard to predict and can scale quickly; Grype depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem
- They diverge on capability: Datadog covers Infrastructure monitoring, Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Datadog and Grype actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Datadog
- Infrastructure monitoring
- Application performance monitoring
- Log management
- Real user monitoring
- Synthetic monitoring
- Security monitoring
- Network monitoring
- Serverless monitoring
Only in Grype
- Image and filesystem scanning
- SBOM-driven
- Wide ecosystem coverage
- Pipeline friendly
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Datadog
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Grype
- Application performancenot Grype
- Security monitoringnot Grype
- Log analysisnot Grype
- Cloud monitoringnot Grype
Grype
- Re-scanning stored SBOMs as new CVEs are published, without rebuilding imagesnot Datadog
- Failing CI when a build introduces a known vulnerabilitynot Datadog
- Auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party imagenot Datadog
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Datadog
- Consumption-based pricing model makes costs hard to predict and can scale quickly
- Add-on modules significantly increase costs: custom metrics, indexed spans, extended retention
- No free tier for production monitoring
- High costs for organizations with large amounts of log data or high-cardinality metrics
Grype
- Depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem
- No triage, exception tracking or reporting UI — that is Anchore’s commercial product
- Overlaps heavily with Trivy, and most teams pick one rather than running both
Pricing, plan by plan
Datadog
$15/month- Infrastructure Monitoring$15/month
- Host monitoring
- Basic dashboards
- APM$31/month
- Application performance monitoring
- Trace collection
- Log Management$0.1/gb
- Log indexing
- Search and filter
Grype
Free- GrypeFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Datadog if
- You need infrastructure monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want application performance monitoring.
Choose Grype if
- You need image and filesystem scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want sbom-driven.
Questions people ask
- Is Datadog or Grype better?
- Neither clearly leads. Datadog starts at $15/month and Grype at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Datadog or Grype?
- Grype has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $15/month for Datadog and Free for Grype.
- Does Datadog or Grype run on more platforms?
- Datadog runs on Web, Linux, Windows, macOS. Grype runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Grype for free?
- Yes. Grype has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Datadog starts at $15/month.
- What is Datadog best used for?
- Datadog is most often used for infrastructure monitoring, application performance, security monitoring, log analysis. Of those, infrastructure monitoring and application performance are not what Grype is typically brought in for.
- What can Datadog do that Grype cannot?
- Datadog covers Infrastructure monitoring, Application performance monitoring, Log management, Real user monitoring. Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning, SBOM-driven, Wide ecosystem coverage, Pipeline friendly.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Datadog: How is Datadog pricing structured?
Datadog uses consumption-based pricing tied to data volume ingested, hosts monitored, and products enabled. Infrastructure Monitoring starts at $15/host/month, APM at $31/host/month, and Log Management at $0.10/GB for indexed logs.
SourceGrype: Is Grype free?
Yes, open source from Anchore. Anchore Enterprise is the paid platform around it.
Datadog: Does Datadog offer a free tier?
Datadog offers a free trial but not a permanent free tier for production monitoring. Pricing begins with paid plans only.
SourceGrype: What is the difference between Grype and Syft?
Syft generates the software bill of materials; Grype matches that inventory against vulnerability data. They are designed to be used together.
Datadog: What integrations does Datadog support?
Datadog offers 1000+ built-in integrations including AWS, Kubernetes, Docker, Azure, GCP, and most major cloud platforms and services.
SourceGrype: Grype or Trivy?
They cover similar ground. Trivy is broader out of the box, including misconfiguration and secret scanning; Grype pairs more cleanly with an SBOM-first workflow.
Datadog: Can Datadog monitor Kubernetes clusters?
Yes. The Datadog Agent runs as a DaemonSet to provide real-time visibility into pods, nodes, deployments, and control-plane health across major Kubernetes distributions including EKS, AKS, GKE, OpenShift, and others.
SourceDatadog: How can I reduce Datadog costs?
Datadog bills based on indexed logs, custom metrics, and high-cardinality tags. Costs can be unpredictable and may run 2-3x estimates. Prepaying annually can secure 5-15% discounts.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Datadog vs Sentry
- Datadog vs PagerDuty
- Datadog vs Dashlane
- Datadog vs LogRocket
- Datadog vs Okta
- Datadog vs Auth0
- Datadog vs Segment
- Datadog vs GitLab
- Datadog vs Coda
- Datadog vs ClickUp
- Datadog vs Linear
- Datadog vs Docker
- Datadog vs Jenkins
- Datadog vs Miro
- Datadog vs Personetics
- Datadog vs Plane
- Datadog vs Postman
- Datadog vs Raycast
- Datadog vs Trivy
- Datadog vs Snyk
- Datadog vs Semgrep
- Datadog vs Chainguard
- Datadog vs HashiCorp Vault
- Datadog vs Bitwarden
- Datadog vs Infisical
- Datadog vs Authelia
- Datadog vs Ory Kratos
- Datadog vs OWASP ZAP
- Datadog vs Cosign
- Datadog vs authentik
- Datadog vs Socket
- Datadog vs Socure
- Datadog vs SonicWall
- Datadog vs Sophos Intercept X
- Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Datadog vs Sticky Password
- Grype vs Sentry
- Grype vs PagerDuty
- Grype vs Dashlane
- Grype vs LogRocket
- Grype vs Okta
- Grype vs Auth0
- Grype vs Segment
- Grype vs GitLab
- Grype vs Coda
- Grype vs ClickUp
- Grype vs Linear
- Grype vs Docker
- Grype vs Jenkins
- Grype vs Miro
- Grype vs Personetics
- Grype vs Plane
- Grype vs Postman
- Grype vs Raycast
- Grype vs Trivy
- Grype vs Snyk
- Grype vs Semgrep
- Grype vs Chainguard
- Grype vs HashiCorp Vault
- Grype vs Bitwarden
- Grype vs Infisical
- Grype vs Authelia
- Grype vs Ory Kratos
- Grype vs OWASP ZAP
- Grype vs Cosign
- Grype vs authentik
- Grype vs Socket
- Grype vs Socure
- Grype vs SonicWall
- Grype vs Sophos Intercept X
- Grype vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Grype vs Sticky Password

