Machine Learning · head to head
Databricks vs DNAnexus

Databricks
Machine Learning
Unified analytics platform for data engineering and data science
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

DNAnexus
Research
Regulated cloud platform for genomic and multiomic data, with GxP and FedRAMP coverage
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Databricks has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Databricks cloud compute is billed separately by the cloud provider on top of Databricks DBU charges; DNAnexus no pricing is published, so an organisation cannot compare the total cost against running the same pipelines on its own cloud account until it is deep in a sales process.
- They diverge on capability: Databricks covers Delta Lake, DNAnexus covers Governed data storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Databricks and DNAnexus actually diverge.
| Attribute | Databricks | DNAnexus |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | usage-based | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp | Web, Linux |
| Category | Machine Learning | Research |
| Founded | 2013 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Databricks
- Delta Lake
- Apache Spark
- MLflow
- Unity Catalog
- Photon Engine
- Collaborative Notebooks
- Auto-scaling
- AWS
Only in DNAnexus
- Governed data storage
- Workflow execution
- App building
- Controlled collaboration
- Compliance posture
- Cohort browsing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Databricks
- Running Spark data engineering pipelines on managed clustersnot DNAnexus
- Building a lakehouse over data in cloud object storagenot DNAnexus
- Training and serving machine learning models alongside the datanot DNAnexus
DNAnexus
- A clinical diagnostics laboratory that needs a CLIA and CAP aligned environment for production sequencing pipelines without building the compliance evidence itselfnot Databricks
- A pharma sponsor analysing genomic endpoints in a registrational programme where 21 CFR Part 11 records are requirednot Databricks
- A biobank or consortium giving hundreds of external researchers governed access to a dataset too large to distributenot Databricks
- A diagnostics vendor packaging its pipeline as a versioned app so partner laboratories can run it without receiving the source codenot Databricks
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Databricks
- Cloud compute is billed separately by the cloud provider on top of Databricks DBU charges
- The free trial lasts 14 days
- Discounts require a Committed Use Contract, with larger commitments needed for larger discounts
- Azure Databricks pricing is set by Microsoft rather than by Databricks
- Security and compliance capabilities are sold as separate platform add ons rather than included in the base rate
DNAnexus
- No pricing is published, so an organisation cannot compare the total cost against running the same pipelines on its own cloud account until it is deep in a sales process.
- Compute and storage are billed through the platform rather than at underlying cloud list price, so the compliance envelope carries a persistent margin on every terabyte and core hour, which grows with the science rather than staying fixed.
- Data egress at genomic scale is slow and chargeable, so leaving the platform later is a real project rather than a contract decision, and that gravity weakens negotiating position at renewal.
- The regulated and validated configurations sit in a higher commercial tier than the research configuration, so an organisation that starts in research mode and later needs GxP faces a repricing rather than a setting change.
- Bioinformaticians used to running Nextflow on their own infrastructure find the platform abstractions constraining, and porting an existing pipeline into the app model is engineering work that does not carry over to any other platform.
Pricing, plan by plan
Databricks
Free- Community EditionFree
- Limited cluster
- Notebook environment
- Community support
- Standard$0.07/DBU
- Jobs compute
- SQL compute
- Standard support
DNAnexus
On request- DNAnexus Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per organisation through a sales process
- Storage and compute billed through the platform rather than at cloud list price
- Regulated and validated configurations are a separate commercial tier
Which should you pick?
Choose Databricks if
- You need delta lake.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp.
- You also want apache spark.
Choose DNAnexus if
- You need governed data storage.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want workflow execution.
Questions people ask
- Is Databricks or DNAnexus better?
- Neither clearly leads. Databricks starts at Free and DNAnexus at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Databricks or DNAnexus?
- Databricks has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Databricks and On request for DNAnexus.
- Does Databricks or DNAnexus run on more platforms?
- Databricks runs on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp. DNAnexus runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Databricks for free?
- Yes. Databricks has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. DNAnexus starts at On request.
- What is Databricks best used for?
- Databricks is most often used for running spark data engineering pipelines on managed clusters, building a lakehouse over data in cloud object storage, training and serving machine learning models alongside the data. Of those, running spark data engineering pipelines on managed clusters and building a lakehouse over data in cloud object storage are not what DNAnexus is typically brought in for.
- What can Databricks do that DNAnexus cannot?
- Databricks covers Delta Lake, Apache Spark, MLflow, Unity Catalog. DNAnexus covers Governed data storage, Workflow execution, App building, Controlled collaboration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Databricks: How is Databricks priced?
Databricks bills pay as you go with no up front cost, charging per second for the products used. Consumption is measured in Databricks Units, a normalised unit of processing power on the platform.
SourceDNAnexus: Why pay for DNAnexus instead of raw AWS?
For the compliance evidence. GxP, FedRAMP, CLIA, CAP and Part 11 coverage removes a validation programme most organisations would otherwise have to build and maintain themselves.
Databricks: Does Databricks publish a per DBU price?
Not on its main pricing page. Rates vary by product and instance type, and Databricks directs buyers to individual product pricing pages and a calculator rather than listing a single figure.
SourceDNAnexus: Is validated use included?
No. Regulated and validated configurations sit in a separate commercial tier from ordinary research use.
Databricks: Does the Databricks price include cloud costs?
No. Databricks states that if you configure it to work with your own cloud account, your cloud provider still charges you separately for the underlying resources.
SourceDNAnexus: Can I get my data out?
Yes, but egress at genomic scale is chargeable and slow, so plan exit costs at the point of signing.
Databricks: Can I get a discount on Databricks?
Databricks offers Committed Use Contracts, where larger usage commitments earn greater benefits, including options to use commitments flexibly across multiple clouds.
SourceDNAnexus: Does it host UK Biobank?
Yes, DNAnexus hosts the UK Biobank research analysis platform, which has its own access approval and cost terms.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Databricks vs AWS SageMaker
- Databricks vs Google Vertex AI
- Databricks vs Azure Machine Learning
- Databricks vs DataRobot
- Databricks vs TensorFlow
- Databricks vs SAS
- Databricks vs Snowflake
- Databricks vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Databricks vs Alteryx
- Databricks vs IBM SPSS
- Databricks vs Palantir Foundry
- Databricks vs BentoML
- Databricks vs ClearML
- Databricks vs Cohere
- Databricks vs Dask
- Databricks vs Fal AI
- Databricks vs BigQuery ML
- Databricks vs Benchling
- Databricks vs Terra
- Databricks vs Seven Bridges
- Databricks vs Form Bio
- Databricks vs Labguru
- Databricks vs Dotmatics
- Databricks vs TetraScience
- Databricks vs Schrodinger
- Databricks vs LabWare
- Databricks vs STARLIMS
- Databricks vs Castor EDC
- Databricks vs Condens
- Databricks vs SurveySparrow
- Databricks vs Contentsquare
- Databricks vs LabArchives
- Databricks vs NVivo
- Databricks vs GWI
- Databricks vs Aurelius
- DNAnexus vs AWS SageMaker
- DNAnexus vs Google Vertex AI
- DNAnexus vs Azure Machine Learning
- DNAnexus vs DataRobot
- DNAnexus vs TensorFlow
- DNAnexus vs SAS
- DNAnexus vs Snowflake
- DNAnexus vs Apache Spark MLlib
- DNAnexus vs Alteryx
- DNAnexus vs IBM SPSS
- DNAnexus vs Palantir Foundry
- DNAnexus vs BentoML
- DNAnexus vs ClearML
- DNAnexus vs Cohere
- DNAnexus vs Dask
- DNAnexus vs Fal AI
- DNAnexus vs BigQuery ML
- DNAnexus vs Benchling
- DNAnexus vs Terra
- DNAnexus vs Seven Bridges
- DNAnexus vs Form Bio
- DNAnexus vs Labguru
- DNAnexus vs Dotmatics
- DNAnexus vs TetraScience
- DNAnexus vs Schrodinger
- DNAnexus vs LabWare
- DNAnexus vs STARLIMS
- DNAnexus vs Castor EDC
- DNAnexus vs Condens
- DNAnexus vs SurveySparrow
- DNAnexus vs Contentsquare
- DNAnexus vs LabArchives
- DNAnexus vs NVivo
- DNAnexus vs GWI
- DNAnexus vs Aurelius
