CAD · head to head
CATIA vs SolveSpace
SolveSpace
CAD
Open source parametric CAD with a constraint solver in a few megabytes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only SolveSpace has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CATIA no public pricing available on vendor website; SolveSpace the in-house geometry kernel fails on complex boolean operations and fillets, and the failure is sometimes silent bad geometry rather than an error message, so models must be checked before export or manufacture.
- They diverge on capability: CATIA covers Surface modeling, SolveSpace covers Constraint solver.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CATIA and SolveSpace actually diverge.
| Attribute | CATIA | SolveSpace |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux (some) | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Founded | 1981 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CATIA
- Surface modeling
- Class A surfacing
- Systems engineering
- Simulation
- Composites design
- Electrical design
- Knowledge-based engineering
- ENOVIA PLM
Only in SolveSpace
- Constraint solver
- Solid modelling
- Assemblies
- Export formats
- Cross-platform
- Small footprint
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CATIA
- 3D product designnot SolveSpace
- Simulation and analysisnot SolveSpace
- System design and developmentnot SolveSpace
- Manufacturing engineeringnot SolveSpace
- Advanced modelingnot SolveSpace
SolveSpace
- Designing 3D printed parts on a machine that cannot run mainstream CADnot CATIA
- Teaching constraint-based parametric modelling without buying licences for a classroomnot CATIA
- Checking that a mechanical linkage moves as intended before cutting metalnot CATIA
- Producing dimensionally accurate STEP or STL output from a small open source toolchainnot CATIA
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CATIA
- No public pricing available on vendor website
- Requires direct contact with sales for quotes
- Enterprise-grade CAD software likely requires substantial investment
SolveSpace
- The in-house geometry kernel fails on complex boolean operations and fillets, and the failure is sometimes silent bad geometry rather than an error message, so models must be checked before export or manufacture.
- There is no proper drawing and dimensioning workflow, so manufacturing documentation has to be produced in another application.
- Development is volunteer-led and intermittent; long gaps between releases are normal and there is no support contract available at any price.
- Assembly-level import of external CAD is very limited, so it does not fit a supply chain that exchanges native or assembly-level models with suppliers.
- The interface follows its own conventions rather than mainstream CAD ones, so existing SolidWorks or Fusion users spend time unlearning habits for a tool with a lower ceiling.
Pricing, plan by plan
CATIA
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the CATIA review.
SolveSpace
Free- SolveSpaceFree
- Full application under the GPL
- No seat limit
- Windows, macOS and Linux builds
Which should you pick?
Choose CATIA if
- You need surface modeling.
- You work on Windows, Linux (some).
- You also want class a surfacing.
Choose SolveSpace if
- You need constraint solver.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want solid modelling.
Questions people ask
- Is CATIA or SolveSpace better?
- Neither clearly leads. CATIA starts at On request and SolveSpace at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CATIA or SolveSpace?
- SolveSpace has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for CATIA and Free for SolveSpace.
- Does CATIA or SolveSpace run on more platforms?
- CATIA runs on Windows, Linux (some). SolveSpace runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use SolveSpace for free?
- Yes. SolveSpace has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CATIA starts at On request.
- What is CATIA best used for?
- CATIA is most often used for 3d product design, simulation and analysis, system design and development, manufacturing engineering. Of those, 3d product design and simulation and analysis are not what SolveSpace is typically brought in for.
- What can CATIA do that SolveSpace cannot?
- CATIA covers Surface modeling, Class A surfacing, Systems engineering, Simulation. SolveSpace covers Constraint solver, Solid modelling, Assemblies, Export formats.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CATIA: How much does CATIA cost?
Pricing is not publicly displayed on CATIA's product page. Customers must contact Dassault Systèmes directly or visit user communities to obtain pricing information for CATIA licenses and subscriptions.
SourceSolveSpace: Is it really free for commercial work?
Yes. It is released under the GPL with no licence fee and no seat limit. Support is community only.
CATIA: Is there a free version of CATIA?
No free version or trial is mentioned on CATIA's product page. CATIA is described as a comprehensive commercial solution for product innovation, and no freemium option is referenced.
SourceSolveSpace: Can it replace Fusion 360 or SolidWorks?
No. It handles parts and simple assemblies well. Complex geometry, drawings and supply chain interoperability are outside its range.
SolveSpace: What hardware does it need?
Very little. It runs on old laptops and small Linux machines where mainstream CAD will not start.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CATIA vs FreeCAD
- CATIA vs V-Ray
- CATIA vs KeyShot
- CATIA vs Enscape
- CATIA vs CoreTechnologie
- CATIA vs Siemens NX
- CATIA vs Rhino 3D
- CATIA vs ANSYS Fluent
- CATIA vs Creo
- CATIA vs Houdini
- CATIA vs LightWave 3D
- CATIA vs CloudCompare
- CATIA vs Modo
- CATIA vs IronCAD
- CATIA vs KiCad
- CATIA vs Redshift
- CATIA vs MicroSurvey CAD
- CATIA vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- CATIA vs OnShape
- CATIA vs Alibre Design
- CATIA vs Bambu Studio
- CATIA vs OpenSCAD
- CATIA vs Zoo
- CATIA vs Bentley MicroStation
- CATIA vs PrusaSlicer
- CATIA vs Mudbox
- CATIA vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- CATIA vs Carlson Software
- CATIA vs Corona Renderer
- CATIA vs D5 Render
- SolveSpace vs FreeCAD
- SolveSpace vs V-Ray
- SolveSpace vs KeyShot
- SolveSpace vs Enscape
- SolveSpace vs CoreTechnologie
- SolveSpace vs Siemens NX
- SolveSpace vs Rhino 3D
- SolveSpace vs ANSYS Fluent
- SolveSpace vs Creo
- SolveSpace vs Houdini
- SolveSpace vs LightWave 3D
- SolveSpace vs CloudCompare
- SolveSpace vs Modo
- SolveSpace vs IronCAD
- SolveSpace vs KiCad
- SolveSpace vs Redshift
- SolveSpace vs MicroSurvey CAD
- SolveSpace vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- SolveSpace vs OnShape
- SolveSpace vs Alibre Design
- SolveSpace vs Bambu Studio
- SolveSpace vs OpenSCAD
- SolveSpace vs Zoo
- SolveSpace vs Bentley MicroStation
- SolveSpace vs PrusaSlicer
- SolveSpace vs Mudbox
- SolveSpace vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- SolveSpace vs Carlson Software
- SolveSpace vs Corona Renderer
- SolveSpace vs D5 Render

