Software · head to head
CATIA vs OnShape
The short version
- Only OnShape has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CATIA pricing page discloses no figures and instead asks buyers to "Speak with a CATIA expert" or "Contact us" through a how-to-buy form, making pricing available only by quote; OnShape the free plan is non commercial only and makes every document publicly accessible, so nothing designed on it can be kept private
- They diverge on capability: CATIA covers Surface modeling, OnShape covers Cloud-native CAD.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CATIA and OnShape actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CATIA
- Surface modeling
- Class A surfacing
- Systems engineering
- Simulation
- Composites design
- Electrical design
- Knowledge-based engineering
- ENOVIA PLM
Only in OnShape
- Cloud-native CAD
- Real-time collaboration
- Version control
- Part studios
- Assemblies
- Drawings
- FeatureScript
- Mobile access
Both cover
- Enterprise security
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CATIA
- Complex surface designnot OnShape
- Aerospace engineeringnot OnShape
- Systems designnot OnShape
OnShape
- Cloud based parametric CAD without local workstation installsnot CATIA
- Collaborative mechanical design with version history and shared documentsnot CATIA
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CATIA
- Pricing page discloses no figures and instead asks buyers to "Speak with a CATIA expert" or "Contact us" through a how-to-buy form, making pricing available only by quote
OnShape
- The free plan is non commercial only and makes every document publicly accessible, so nothing designed on it can be kept private
- The Standard plan is $1,500 per user per year and Professional $2,500
- Simulation, rendering, CAM and advanced PDM all require the Professional plan
- SSO, analytics and advanced administration are Enterprise only with no published price
Pricing, plan by plan
CATIA
$29/month- Design$6600/month
- Core design capabilities
- Engineering$11000/month
- Design + simulation
- Experience$16500/month
- Full suite with collaboration
OnShape
Free- FreeFree
- Limited features
- Public documents
- Standard$1500/month
- Private documents
- Full features
- Professional$2100/month
- Advanced simulation
- Enterprise features
Which should you pick?
Choose CATIA if
- You need surface modeling.
- You work on Windows, Linux (some).
- You also want class a surfacing.
Choose OnShape if
- You need cloud-native cad.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, IOS, Android.
- You also want real-time collaboration.
Questions people ask
- Is CATIA or OnShape better?
- Neither clearly leads. CATIA starts at $29/month and OnShape at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CATIA or OnShape?
- OnShape has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29/month for CATIA and Free for OnShape.
- Does CATIA or OnShape run on more platforms?
- CATIA runs on Windows, Linux (some). OnShape runs on Web, IOS, Android.
- Can I use OnShape for free?
- Yes. OnShape has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CATIA starts at $29/month.
- What is CATIA best used for?
- CATIA is most often used for complex surface design, aerospace engineering, systems design. Of those, complex surface design and aerospace engineering are not what OnShape is typically brought in for.
- What can CATIA do that OnShape cannot?
- CATIA covers Surface modeling, Class A surfacing, Systems engineering, Simulation. OnShape covers Cloud-native CAD, Real-time collaboration, Version control, Part studios. Both handle Enterprise security.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- CATIA vs Enscape
- CATIA vs V-Ray
- CATIA vs FreeCAD
- CATIA vs KeyShot
- CATIA vs Lumion
- CATIA vs Houdini
- CATIA vs Arnold
- CATIA vs Inventor
- CATIA vs Mudbox
- CATIA vs Corona Renderer
- CATIA vs D5 Render
- CATIA vs Twinmotion
- CATIA vs LightWave 3D
- CATIA vs OpenSCAD
- CATIA vs PrusaSlicer
- CATIA vs Siemens NX
- CATIA vs ZBrush
- CATIA vs 3D-Coat
- OnShape vs Enscape
- OnShape vs V-Ray
- OnShape vs FreeCAD
- OnShape vs KeyShot
- OnShape vs Lumion
- OnShape vs Houdini
- OnShape vs Arnold
- OnShape vs Inventor
- OnShape vs Mudbox
- OnShape vs Corona Renderer
- OnShape vs D5 Render
- OnShape vs Twinmotion
- OnShape vs LightWave 3D
- OnShape vs OpenSCAD
- OnShape vs PrusaSlicer
- OnShape vs Siemens NX
- OnShape vs ZBrush
- OnShape vs 3D-Coat


