Testing · head to head
Cypress vs Keycloak

Cypress
Testing
JavaScript end-to-end testing framework with browser-based runner and cloud service
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cypress limited to web applications; mobile and desktop app testing not supported; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cypress and Keycloak actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cypress
- End-to-end testing for modern JavaScript web applicationsnot Keycloak
- Continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test executionnot Keycloak
- Visual regression testing and accessibility verificationnot Keycloak
- Flaky test detection and eliminationnot Keycloak
- Team collaboration on test maintenance and debuggingnot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Cypress
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Cypress
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Cypress
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Cypress
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Cypress
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cypress
- Limited to web applications; mobile and desktop app testing not supported
- Free tier capped at 500 test results/month; insufficient for most development teams
- Paid features (flake detection, analytics) not included in free tier
- JavaScript/TypeScript focused; less suitable for polyglot organisations
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Cypress
Free- Starter (Free)Free
- 500 test results/month
- 100 prompt executions/month
- Parallelisation
- Team$67/month
- 120k test results/year
- 9k prompt executions/year
- Flake detection
- Business$267/month
- 120k test results/year
- 24k prompt executions/year
- Spec prioritisation
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- 1.8M test results/year
- 60k prompt executions/year
- Unlimited users
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Cypress or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cypress starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cypress or Keycloak?
- Cypress starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Cypress or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Cypress runs on macOS, Windows, Linux. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Cypress for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cypress best used for?
- Cypress is most often used for end-to-end testing for modern javascript web applications, continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test execution, visual regression testing and accessibility verification, flaky test detection and elimination. Of those, end-to-end testing for modern javascript web applications and continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test execution are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cypress: Is Cypress free?
Yes, Cypress offers a free Starter plan with 500 test results per month, 100 prompt executions monthly, 50 users, and 30-day data retention. No credit card is required.
SourceKeycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceCypress: How much does Cypress Team cost?
Cypress Team costs $67 per month when billed monthly or $799 per year for annual billing (11% savings). It includes 120,000 annual test results, 9,000 yearly prompt executions, 50 users, 90-day data retention, flake detection, Jira integration, and email support.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceCypress: What is the difference between Cypress Team and Business?
Cypress Business costs $267 per month (or $3,199 annually) compared to Team's $67/month ($799/year). Business provides twice the prompt executions (24,000 vs. 9,000 yearly), spec prioritization, auto-cancellation, and enterprise GitHub/GitLab support.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceCypress: Can I purchase additional test results on Cypress?
Yes, Cypress allows purchasing bundled on-demand test results. Team costs $6 per 1,000 results, Business costs $5 per 1,000, and Enterprise pricing is custom. Open-source projects qualify for complimentary cloud services.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cypress vs CircleCI
- Cypress vs Insomnia
- Cypress vs BrowserStack
- Cypress vs BugHerd
- Cypress vs Playwright
- Cypress vs GitHub Actions
- Cypress vs Selenium
- Cypress vs Puppeteer
- Cypress vs Vitest
- Cypress vs Zephyr Scale
- Cypress vs Visual Studio Code
- Cypress vs ESLint
- Cypress vs pnpm
- Cypress vs Turborepo
- Cypress vs GitHub Copilot
- Cypress vs Penpot
- Cypress vs Rust
- Cypress vs CLion
- Cypress vs GNAT Pro
- Cypress vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Cypress vs GNU Emacs
- Cypress vs Keil MDK
- Cypress vs Vite
- Cypress vs Bazel
- Cypress vs CodeSandbox
- Cypress vs Eclipse IDE
- Cypress vs Moonrepo
- Cypress vs Nx Cloud
- Keycloak vs CircleCI
- Keycloak vs Insomnia
- Keycloak vs BrowserStack
- Keycloak vs BugHerd
- Keycloak vs Playwright
- Keycloak vs GitHub Actions
- Keycloak vs Selenium
- Keycloak vs Puppeteer
- Keycloak vs Vitest
- Keycloak vs Zephyr Scale
- Keycloak vs Visual Studio Code
- Keycloak vs ESLint
- Keycloak vs pnpm
- Keycloak vs Turborepo
- Keycloak vs GitHub Copilot
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Rust
- Keycloak vs CLion
- Keycloak vs GNAT Pro
- Keycloak vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Keycloak vs GNU Emacs
- Keycloak vs Keil MDK
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Bazel
- Keycloak vs CodeSandbox
- Keycloak vs Eclipse IDE
- Keycloak vs Moonrepo
- Keycloak vs Nx Cloud
