Cybersecurity · head to head
CyberGhost VPN vs Fenergo
CyberGhost VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN operated from Romania and owned by Kape Technologies, with a no-logs claim audited by Deloitte.
- From
- $2.19/month
- Rated
- -

Fenergo
Cybersecurity
Client lifecycle management and KYC onboarding for regulated financial institutions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CyberGhost VPN kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.; Fenergo implementations commonly run twelve to twenty-four months and depend on a systems integrator, so the services cost frequently exceeds the software subscription in year one.
- They diverge on capability: CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, Fenergo covers Regulatory rules library.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CyberGhost VPN and Fenergo actually diverge.
| Attribute | CyberGhost VPN | Fenergo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2.19/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Mobile | Web |
| Founded | 2011 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CyberGhost VPN
- NoSpy servers
- Audited no-logs policy
- WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2
- Streaming-labelled servers
- Dedicated IP via token
- Kill switch
- Split tunnelling
- Smart Rules
Only in Fenergo
- Regulatory rules library
- Digital onboarding
- Perpetual KYC
- Entity data model
- Screening orchestration
- Case management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CyberGhost VPN
- A household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public Wi-Finot Fenergo
- A buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the Fourteen Eyes with a published third-party no-logs auditnot Fenergo
- Torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer trafficnot Fenergo
- Travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technicalnot Fenergo
Fenergo
- A bank operating in twenty jurisdictions that cannot keep local KYC requirements current across separate regional teamsnot CyberGhost VPN
- A custodian moving from calendar-based periodic review to event-driven perpetual KYC to cut analyst headcountnot CyberGhost VPN
- An asset manager onboarding funds and trusts where the ownership hierarchy defeats generic identity verification toolsnot CyberGhost VPN
- A payments institution facing a regulatory remediation order and needing a defensible audit trail of every client reviewnot CyberGhost VPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CyberGhost VPN
- Kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.
- Pricing is structured so that the deep discount applies to the longest initial term and the standard rate applies at renewal, which means the figure used to make the decision is not the figure paid in year three unless the subscriber renegotiates or churns.
- The Deloitte engagement is point-in-time assurance over stated policy and server configuration, so it confirms things were as described when examined and says nothing about how the infrastructure behaves today or after an ownership change.
- Client capability differs sharply by platform: the Linux client is command-line only and lacks the kill switch and split tunnelling that the Windows client has, so a mixed-device household does not get the protection that reviews of the Windows app describe.
- Streaming-optimised server labels go stale because platforms block address ranges continually, and the practical support answer is to try a different server, which makes the labelled-server feature less dependable than the marketing implies.
Fenergo
- Implementations commonly run twelve to twenty-four months and depend on a systems integrator, so the services cost frequently exceeds the software subscription in year one.
- It orchestrates screening but does not supply the sanctions, PEP or adverse media data, so you still buy Dow Jones, LexisNexis or World-Check separately and those fees are per screened entity.
- The entry price is set for institutions with large onboarding volumes, which puts it out of reach of smaller banks and fintechs that would otherwise benefit from the rules library.
- Configuration is deep and specific, which makes upgrades between major versions a project rather than a patch, and some customers stay on old releases for years.
- The rules library covers regulatory requirements, not your internal risk appetite, so the policy tuning that determines whether onboarding actually gets faster remains your work.
Pricing, plan by plan
CyberGhost VPN
$2.19/month- 1 Month$12.99/month
- 7 devices
- 9000+ servers
- Unlimited bandwidth
- 2 Years + 2 Months$2.19/month
- All features
- Best value
- 45-day guarantee
- 6 Months$6.99/month
- All features
- 45-day guarantee
Fenergo
On request- Fenergo Client Lifecycle Management$undefined/year
- Priced by institution size, jurisdictions in scope and modules licensed
- Regulatory rules content subscription bundled into the annual fee
- Implementation delivered by Fenergo or a systems integrator and quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose CyberGhost VPN if
- You need nospy servers.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want audited no-logs policy.
Questions people ask
- Is CyberGhost VPN or Fenergo better?
- Neither clearly leads. CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month and Fenergo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CyberGhost VPN or Fenergo?
- CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month and Fenergo at On request.
- Does CyberGhost VPN or Fenergo run on more platforms?
- CyberGhost VPN runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile. Fenergo runs on Web.
- What is CyberGhost VPN best used for?
- CyberGhost VPN is most often used for a household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public wi-fi, a buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the fourteen eyes with a published third-party no-logs audit, torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer traffic, travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technical. Of those, a household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public wi-fi and a buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the fourteen eyes with a published third-party no-logs audit are not what Fenergo is typically brought in for.
- What can CyberGhost VPN do that Fenergo cannot?
- CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, Audited no-logs policy, WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2, Streaming-labelled servers. Fenergo covers Regulatory rules library, Digital onboarding, Perpetual KYC, Entity data model.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CyberGhost VPN: Who owns CyberGhost?
Kape Technologies, which acquired it in 2017. Kape was formerly called Crossrider and also owns ExpressVPN, Private Internet Access and Zenmate, plus the review sites vpnMentor and Wizcase.
Fenergo: Does Fenergo do the sanctions screening itself?
No. It orchestrates calls to third-party data providers such as Dow Jones and World-Check, and those subscriptions are additional and usually charged per screened entity.
CyberGhost VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
Yes. Deloitte has examined the no-logs policy and server configuration and published an assurance report. Note that this is a point-in-time engagement, not continuous monitoring.
Fenergo: Is it SaaS or on-premises?
Both. The SaaS offering runs on Microsoft Azure with regional deployment options, which matters where data residency rules prohibit client data leaving the jurisdiction.
CyberGhost VPN: What jurisdiction is it under?
The service is operated from Romania, which has no mandatory communications data retention law in force and is not a member of the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes intelligence-sharing arrangements. Ownership sits with Kape, headquartered in the UK.
Fenergo: How long does a deployment take?
Plan for a year at minimum for a multi-jurisdiction rollout. Single-jurisdiction deployments with a narrow product set can be shorter but rarely under six months.
CyberGhost VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Often, using the servers labelled for each service, but this changes constantly as platforms block address ranges. Treat streaming access as a feature that may stop working on any given day rather than a guarantee.
CyberGhost VPN: Can I use it on Linux or a router?
There is a command-line Linux client with fewer features than the desktop apps, and router use requires manual OpenVPN configuration rather than an official app.
Related pages
More on CyberGhost VPN
Other head to heads
- CyberGhost VPN vs Surfshark
- CyberGhost VPN vs Norton 360
- CyberGhost VPN vs 1Password
- CyberGhost VPN vs Bitdefender Total Security
- CyberGhost VPN vs LastPass
- CyberGhost VPN vs NordVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Private Internet Access
- CyberGhost VPN vs TunnelBear
- CyberGhost VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Windscribe
- CyberGhost VPN vs Avast One
- CyberGhost VPN vs IVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sigstore
- CyberGhost VPN vs Speakeasy
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sysdig
- CyberGhost VPN vs Tenable
- CyberGhost VPN vs Trend Micro Vision One
- CyberGhost VPN vs Veriff
- CyberGhost VPN vs Trulioo
- CyberGhost VPN vs NICE Actimize
- CyberGhost VPN vs Jumio
- CyberGhost VPN vs Quantexa
- CyberGhost VPN vs iDenfy
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sumsub
- CyberGhost VPN vs Shufti Pro
- CyberGhost VPN vs ThetaRay
- CyberGhost VPN vs IDnow
- CyberGhost VPN vs Feedzai
- CyberGhost VPN vs Unit21
- CyberGhost VPN vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- CyberGhost VPN vs Passbolt
- CyberGhost VPN vs Ping Identity
- CyberGhost VPN vs Proofpoint
- CyberGhost VPN vs Qualys VMDR
- CyberGhost VPN vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Fenergo vs Surfshark
- Fenergo vs Norton 360
- Fenergo vs 1Password
- Fenergo vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Fenergo vs LastPass
- Fenergo vs NordVPN
- Fenergo vs Private Internet Access
- Fenergo vs TunnelBear
- Fenergo vs Mullvad VPN
- Fenergo vs Windscribe
- Fenergo vs Avast One
- Fenergo vs IVPN
- Fenergo vs Sigstore
- Fenergo vs Speakeasy
- Fenergo vs Sysdig
- Fenergo vs Tenable
- Fenergo vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Fenergo vs Veriff
- Fenergo vs Trulioo
- Fenergo vs NICE Actimize
- Fenergo vs Jumio
- Fenergo vs Quantexa
- Fenergo vs iDenfy
- Fenergo vs Sumsub
- Fenergo vs Shufti Pro
- Fenergo vs ThetaRay
- Fenergo vs IDnow
- Fenergo vs Feedzai
- Fenergo vs Unit21
- Fenergo vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Fenergo vs Passbolt
- Fenergo vs Ping Identity
- Fenergo vs Proofpoint
- Fenergo vs Qualys VMDR
- Fenergo vs Rapid7 InsightVM
