Cybersecurity · head to head
Cybereason Defense Platform vs Garden

Cybereason Defense Platform
Cybersecurity
AI-driven endpoint protection and detection
- From
- $50/year
- Free plan
- No

Garden
Developer Tools
Kubernetes development and testing automation with shared caching, now owned by Incredibuild
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Garden has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cybereason Defense Platform no published pricing on any platform tier: three plan levels (Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced, Enterprise Complete) feature-differentiated but cost-free; Garden incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- They diverge on capability: Cybereason Defense Platform covers Next-gen antivirus, Garden covers Action graph.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cybereason Defense Platform and Garden actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cybereason Defense Platform | Garden |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $50/year | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Macos, Linux, Mobile | Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cybereason Defense Platform
- Next-gen antivirus
- Endpoint detection and response
- Machine learning detection
- Behavioral analysis
- Threat hunting
- Automated remediation
- XDR integration
- Ransomware protection
Only in Garden
- Action graph
- Shared result caching
- Remote Kubernetes environments
- In-cluster builds
- Same config everywhere
- Hot reload sync
- Helm and Kustomize support
- Templating
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cybereason Defense Platform
- Enterprise threat detection and response platformnot Garden
- Managed detection and response (MDR) servicesnot Garden
- Advanced cybersecurity for large organizationsnot Garden
Garden
- A platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loopnot Cybereason Defense Platform
- An organisation with thirty or more services on Kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates productionnot Cybereason Defense Platform
- Giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environmentnot Cybereason Defense Platform
- Running the identical build and test definition locally and in CI so failures reproduce on a laptopnot Cybereason Defense Platform
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cybereason Defense Platform
- No published pricing on any platform tier: three plan levels (Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced, Enterprise Complete) feature-differentiated but cost-free
- MDR services cost hidden: tiered MDR inclusion (Essentials, Essentials+XR, Complete) does not disclose pricing per tier
- Add-on pricing absent: incident response, DFIR, assessments, mobile defense, threat hunting marked as 'Add-On' with no pricing
- Sales-gated all pricing: no budget range or starting price available; customers must book demo or contact sales
Garden
- Incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- It is tightly bound to Kubernetes, so teams running on ECS, Nomad, plain VMs or serverless get little from it and would need a different tool entirely.
- The YAML action graph is a real configuration surface: a large monorepo needs someone to own and maintain Garden config as a first-class artefact, which is a standing platform-engineering cost.
- Shared remote environments mean every developer needs cluster access and a cost allocation model, so cloud spend rises and namespace sprawl becomes a thing you have to police.
- Caching correctness depends on declaring dependencies accurately; an under-declared action will serve a stale cached pass and hide a genuine test failure, which is a hard class of bug to notice.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cybereason Defense Platform
$50/year- Cybereason NGAV$50/year
- Next-gen antivirus
- Machine learning detection
- Ransomware protection
- Cybereason EDR$85/year
- All NGAV features
- Endpoint detection
- Automated response
- Cybereason Complete$150/year
- All EDR features
- Managed detection
- 24/7 SOC support
Garden
Free- Garden open sourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed CLI
- Full action graph and caching
- Self-managed clusters
- Commercial tier$undefined/year
- Hosted caching and team features
- Support and onboarding
- Pricing no longer published since the Incredibuild acquisition
Which should you pick?
Choose Cybereason Defense Platform if
- You need next-gen antivirus.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Mobile.
- You also want endpoint detection and response.
Choose Garden if
- You need action graph.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- You also want shared result caching.
Questions people ask
- Is Cybereason Defense Platform or Garden better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cybereason Defense Platform starts at $50/year and Garden at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cybereason Defense Platform or Garden?
- Garden has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $50/year for Cybereason Defense Platform and Free for Garden.
- Does Cybereason Defense Platform or Garden run on more platforms?
- Cybereason Defense Platform runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Mobile. Garden runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Garden for free?
- Yes. Garden has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cybereason Defense Platform starts at $50/year.
- What is Cybereason Defense Platform best used for?
- Cybereason Defense Platform is most often used for enterprise threat detection and response platform, managed detection and response (mdr) services, advanced cybersecurity for large organizations. Of those, enterprise threat detection and response platform and managed detection and response (mdr) services are not what Garden is typically brought in for.
- What can Cybereason Defense Platform do that Garden cannot?
- Cybereason Defense Platform covers Next-gen antivirus, Endpoint detection and response, Machine learning detection, Behavioral analysis. Garden covers Action graph, Shared result caching, Remote Kubernetes environments, In-cluster builds.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cybereason Defense Platform: What are the Cybereason Enterprise pricing tiers?
Cybereason offers three tiers (Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced, Enterprise Complete) with different MDR service levels (MDR Essentials, MDR Essentials+XR, MDR Complete), but exact pricing is not published.
SourceGarden: Is Garden still maintained?
The open source project remains on GitHub under Incredibuild ownership, but the commercial pricing page redirects to the docs and there is no public paid offer.
Cybereason Defense Platform: How much do add-on services cost (incident response, DFIR, threat hunting)?
Add-on services (incident response, DFIR, security assessments, mobile defense, threat hunting) are available across all plans but marked as 'Add-On' with no published pricing.
SourceGarden: Do I need Kubernetes?
Effectively yes. Garden is built around Kubernetes environments and offers little to teams on other runtimes.
Cybereason Defense Platform: How do I get pricing from Cybereason?
Click 'Book a Demo' or 'Talk to a Cybereason Defender' on the website. Cybereason sales will discuss pricing, platform fit, and custom solutions based on your organization's needs.
SourceGarden: Does it replace my CI system?
No. It runs inside GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or similar and speeds up what those pipelines execute.
Garden: What is the actual saving?
It comes from skipping builds and tests whose inputs have not changed, so the benefit scales with how many services you have and how often only a few change.
Related pages
More on Cybereason Defense Platform
Other head to heads
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Norton 360
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs 1Password
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs LastPass
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs VMware Carbon Black
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Sophos Intercept X
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Darktrace
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Envysion
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Feedzai
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Frontegg
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Infisical
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs JumpCloud
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs SentinelOne
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Okteto
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Ansible
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Depot
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Earthly
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Tilt
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs WarpBuild
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Nix
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Blacksmith
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Namespace
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs ConfigCat
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs OpsLevel
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Bazel
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Visual Studio
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Warp
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Xlinesoft
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs GNU Emacs
- Cybereason Defense Platform vs Keil MDK
- Garden vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Garden vs Norton 360
- Garden vs 1Password
- Garden vs LastPass
- Garden vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Garden vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Garden vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Garden vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Garden vs VMware Carbon Black
- Garden vs Sophos Intercept X
- Garden vs Darktrace
- Garden vs Envysion
- Garden vs Feedzai
- Garden vs Frontegg
- Garden vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Garden vs Infisical
- Garden vs JumpCloud
- Garden vs SentinelOne
- Garden vs Okteto
- Garden vs Ansible
- Garden vs Depot
- Garden vs Earthly
- Garden vs Tilt
- Garden vs WarpBuild
- Garden vs Nix
- Garden vs Blacksmith
- Garden vs Namespace
- Garden vs ConfigCat
- Garden vs OpsLevel
- Garden vs Bazel
- Garden vs Visual Studio
- Garden vs Warp
- Garden vs Xlinesoft
- Garden vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Garden vs GNU Emacs
- Garden vs Keil MDK
