Software Development · head to head
Cursor vs Keycloak

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cursor cannot work fully offline; AI features require internet connection; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cursor and Keycloak actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cursor
- AI code completion
- Natural language editing
- Codebase chat
- Multi-file editing
- Code generation
- Bug fixing assistance
- Refactoring suggestions
- AI pair programming
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Cursor does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cursor
- AI-assisted codingnot Keycloak
- Code generationnot Keycloak
- Bug fixingnot Keycloak
- Refactoringnot Keycloak
- Learning new codebasesnot Keycloak
- Rapid prototypingnot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Cursor
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Cursor
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Cursor
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Cursor
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Cursor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cursor
- Cannot work fully offline; AI features require internet connection
- Local models require requests to route through Cursor's backend, not true localhost support
- Free tier capped at 2,000 completions per month
- Codebase indexing uploads code chunks to compute embeddings, with file caching handled server-side
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Cursor
Free- HobbyFree
- 2,000 completions/month
- 50 slow premium requests
- Basic autocomplete
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited completions
- 500 fast premium requests
- Composer multi-file editor
- Pro+$60/month
- 3x Pro limits on Agent requests
- Priority feature access
- Teams Standard$40/user/month
- All Individual Pro features
- Centralized billing
- SAML/OIDC SSO
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Cursor if
- You need ai code completion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux.
- You also want natural language editing.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Cursor or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cursor starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cursor or Keycloak?
- Cursor starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Cursor or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Cursor runs on Windows, Macos, Linux. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Cursor for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cursor best used for?
- Cursor is most often used for ai-assisted coding, code generation, bug fixing, refactoring. Of those, ai-assisted coding and code generation are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Cursor do that Keycloak cannot?
- Cursor covers AI code completion, Natural language editing, Codebase chat, Multi-file editing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cursor: What's included in Cursor's free tier and what are its limits?
The free Hobby plan provides 2,000 completions per month and 50 slow premium requests, with access to basic autocomplete features. Codebase-wide indexing and the Composer multi-file editor are not available on the free plan.
SourceKeycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceCursor: Does Cursor require an internet connection to edit code?
While Cursor can open and edit files locally, its AI features including autocomplete, chat, agents, and codebase-aware reasoning require internet access to cloud-hosted models.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceCursor: Can I use Cursor with local models running on my machine?
Cursor can integrate with local models, but requests still route through Cursor's backend for prompt building. True localhost mode without external endpoints is not supported. The paid plan ($20+/month) is required to use local models.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceCursor: What privacy controls does Cursor offer?
Cursor offers Privacy Mode (enabled on paid Team plans) which prevents customer data from being used for model training, with zero data retention agreements with all AI providers. When disabled, Cursor may use codebase data to improve features.
SourceCursor: What are the differences between Pro and Pro+ plans?
Pro ($20/month) includes unlimited completions and 500 fast premium requests, while Pro+ ($60/month) provides 3x those request limits, priority feature access, and extended Agent capabilities.
SourceCursor: Does Cursor support SSO and on which plan?
SSO with SAML/OIDC is included on Teams Standard ($40/user/month) and higher plans, with full team administration and audit logs.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cursor vs Windsurf
- Cursor vs Zed
- Cursor vs Amp
- Cursor vs Braintrust
- Cursor vs Codacy
- Cursor vs DeepSource
- Cursor vs Devin
- Cursor vs SonarQube Cloud
- Cursor vs Augment Code
- Cursor vs Baseten
- Cursor vs Drizzle ORM
- Cursor vs Flagsmith
- Cursor vs Unleash
- Cursor vs Bun
- Cursor vs Cline
- Cursor vs Factory
- Cursor vs Humanloop
- Cursor vs Langfuse
- Cursor vs Visual Studio Code
- Cursor vs ESLint
- Cursor vs pnpm
- Cursor vs Turborepo
- Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
- Cursor vs Penpot
- Cursor vs Rust
- Cursor vs CLion
- Cursor vs GNAT Pro
- Cursor vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Cursor vs GNU Emacs
- Cursor vs Keil MDK
- Cursor vs Vite
- Cursor vs Bazel
- Cursor vs CodeSandbox
- Cursor vs Eclipse IDE
- Cursor vs Moonrepo
- Cursor vs Nx Cloud
- Keycloak vs Windsurf
- Keycloak vs Zed
- Keycloak vs Amp
- Keycloak vs Braintrust
- Keycloak vs Codacy
- Keycloak vs DeepSource
- Keycloak vs Devin
- Keycloak vs SonarQube Cloud
- Keycloak vs Augment Code
- Keycloak vs Baseten
- Keycloak vs Drizzle ORM
- Keycloak vs Flagsmith
- Keycloak vs Unleash
- Keycloak vs Bun
- Keycloak vs Cline
- Keycloak vs Factory
- Keycloak vs Humanloop
- Keycloak vs Langfuse
- Keycloak vs Visual Studio Code
- Keycloak vs ESLint
- Keycloak vs pnpm
- Keycloak vs Turborepo
- Keycloak vs GitHub Copilot
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Rust
- Keycloak vs CLion
- Keycloak vs GNAT Pro
- Keycloak vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Keycloak vs GNU Emacs
- Keycloak vs Keil MDK
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Bazel
- Keycloak vs CodeSandbox
- Keycloak vs Eclipse IDE
- Keycloak vs Moonrepo
- Keycloak vs Nx Cloud

