Business Intelligence · head to head
Cube vs Keycloak

Cube
Business Intelligence
AI-native analytics platform with semantic layer and governed access
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Keycloak is an open-source IAM platform supporting OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.
- Keycloak is free; Cube starts at $40/mo.
- Where Cube falls short: per-developer licensing can be expensive for large analytics teams.
- Where Keycloak falls short: requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cube and Keycloak actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cube
- Analytics Chat
- Workbooks
- Dashboards
- Embedded Analytics
- AI Integrations
- Core Data APIs
- Caching and pre-aggregations
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Cube does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cube
- Building governed semantic data models for analyticsnot Keycloak
- Embedding analytics into customer-facing productsnot Keycloak
- Enabling natural language data queries for teamsnot Keycloak
- Creating conversational dashboards with AI assistancenot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Cube
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Cube
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Cube
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Cube
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Cube
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cube
- Per-developer licensing can be expensive for large analytics teams
- Additional cost for Explorer and Viewer roles beyond developers
- Semantic layer approach requires upfront modeling investment
- Smaller connector ecosystem than dedicated BI platforms
- May be overengineered for simple reporting needs
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Cube
Free- FreeFree
- For hobbyists and personal projects
- Basic data source connection
- Semantic modeling
- Starter$40
- Extended agent limits
- Premium LLMs
- Unlimited workbooks
- Premium$80
- All Starter features
- Embedded dashboards
- Embedded analytics chat
- EnterpriseOn request
- 99.990% uptime SLA
- Dedicated single-tenant installation
- Bring Your Own Cloud
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Cube if
- You need analytics chat.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want workbooks.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Cube or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cube starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cube or Keycloak?
- Cube starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Cube or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Cube runs on Web, Self-hosted. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Cube for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cube best used for?
- Cube is most often used for building governed semantic data models for analytics, embedding analytics into customer-facing products, enabling natural language data queries for teams, creating conversational dashboards with ai assistance. Of those, building governed semantic data models for analytics and embedding analytics into customer-facing products are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Cube do that Keycloak cannot?
- Cube covers Analytics Chat, Workbooks, Dashboards, Embedded Analytics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cube: What is the cost per developer on Cube?
Starter plan costs $40/developer/month. Premium adds embedded analytics at $80/developer/month. Explorer and Viewer roles cost $40 and $20/month respectively.
SourceKeycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceCube: What uptime SLAs does Cube offer?
Premium plan offers 99.950% uptime SLA. Enterprise plan provides 99.990% uptime SLA with dedicated support.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceCube: Can I use Cube for free?
Yes, the Free plan includes basic data source connection, semantic modeling, workbooks, and dashboards for hobbyists and personal projects.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cube vs Evidence
- Cube vs Zenlytic
- Cube vs Sisense
- Cube vs GoodData
- Cube vs Logi Analytics
- Cube vs Yellowfin
- Cube vs Dundas BI
- Cube vs Fabi
- Cube vs ThoughtSpot
- Cube vs Jedox
- Cube vs Pigment
- Cube vs Luzmo
- Cube vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Cube vs Cyfe
- Cube vs DashThis
- Cube vs Deepnote
- Cube vs Geckoboard
- Cube vs Google Data Studio
- Cube vs Jenkins
- Cube vs Atlantis
- Cube vs Soketi
- Cube vs Kubernetes
- Cube vs GitLab
- Cube vs Vite
- Cube vs Depot
- Cube vs Ansible
- Cube vs Buildkite
- Cube vs Coder
- Cube vs Bitbucket
- Cube vs Sweep
- Cube vs Git
- Cube vs GitHub Desktop
- Cube vs GoLand
- Cube vs Hookdeck
- Cube vs Istio
- Cube vs JFrog Artifactory
- Keycloak vs Evidence
- Keycloak vs Zenlytic
- Keycloak vs Sisense
- Keycloak vs GoodData
- Keycloak vs Logi Analytics
- Keycloak vs Yellowfin
- Keycloak vs Dundas BI
- Keycloak vs Fabi
- Keycloak vs ThoughtSpot
- Keycloak vs Jedox
- Keycloak vs Pigment
- Keycloak vs Luzmo
- Keycloak vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Keycloak vs Cyfe
- Keycloak vs DashThis
- Keycloak vs Deepnote
- Keycloak vs Geckoboard
- Keycloak vs Google Data Studio
- Keycloak vs Jenkins
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Kubernetes
- Keycloak vs GitLab
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Git
- Keycloak vs GitHub Desktop
- Keycloak vs GoLand
- Keycloak vs Hookdeck
- Keycloak vs Istio
- Keycloak vs JFrog Artifactory
