Cloud · head to head
Crossplane vs Soketi

Soketi
Developer Tools
Self-hosted, Pusher-compatible WebSockets server with a stalled maintenance record
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Crossplane requires Kubernetes expertise and infrastructure; Soketi maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- They diverge on capability: Crossplane covers Kubernetes extension, Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Crossplane and Soketi actually diverge.
| Attribute | Crossplane | Soketi |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Category | Cloud | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Crossplane
- Kubernetes extension
- Custom API building
- Resource management anywhere
- Declarative interfaces
- Component library
- Provider ecosystem
Only in Soketi
- Pusher protocol compatibility
- Presence and private channels
- Horizontal scaling
- App management backends
- Webhooks
- Prometheus metrics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Crossplane
- Building platform-as-a-service offerings for internal teamsnot Soketi
- Creating unified control layers for multi-cloud infrastructurenot Soketi
- Designing declarative APIs for infrastructure provisioningnot Soketi
Soketi
- A Laravel application that already uses Echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime providernot Crossplane
- Realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasonsnot Crossplane
- A local or CI environment that needs a Pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid accountnot Crossplane
- A high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure billnot Crossplane
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Crossplane
- Requires Kubernetes expertise and infrastructure
- Steep learning curve for teams new to Kubernetes patterns
- Provider ecosystem smaller than Terraform
Soketi
- Maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- Dependency drift on Node and uWebSockets.js will eventually force you to fork or migrate, and that cost is unbudgeted at the point you adopt it.
- There is no commercial support to buy, so a production incident at three in the morning is entirely your problem with no escalation path.
- Scaling beyond a single node needs Redis and careful configuration, and getting presence channels correct across nodes is a genuine source of subtle bugs.
- It implements the Pusher protocol rather than tracking it, so any protocol feature Pusher adds later will not appear, and the compatibility guarantee slowly decays.
Pricing, plan by plan
Crossplane
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Crossplane review.
Soketi
Free- SoketiFree
- MIT licensed
- Unlimited connections subject to your own hardware
- No vendor billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Crossplane if
- You need kubernetes extension.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want custom api building.
Choose Soketi if
- You need pusher protocol compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want presence and private channels.
Questions people ask
- Is Crossplane or Soketi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Crossplane starts at Free and Soketi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Crossplane or Soketi?
- Crossplane starts at Free and Soketi at Free.
- Does Crossplane or Soketi run on more platforms?
- Crossplane runs on Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP. Soketi runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Crossplane for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Crossplane best used for?
- Crossplane is most often used for building platform-as-a-service offerings for internal teams, creating unified control layers for multi-cloud infrastructure, designing declarative apis for infrastructure provisioning. Of those, building platform-as-a-service offerings for internal teams and creating unified control layers for multi-cloud infrastructure are not what Soketi is typically brought in for.
- What can Crossplane do that Soketi cannot?
- Crossplane covers Kubernetes extension, Custom API building, Resource management anywhere, Declarative interfaces. Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Presence and private channels, Horizontal scaling, App management backends.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Crossplane: Is Crossplane free?
Yes, Crossplane is open source and free to use. It requires a Kubernetes cluster but has no licensing costs.
SourceSoketi: Is Soketi still maintained?
Barely. The maintainer has stated that available time is very limited and releases have been sparse; treat it as community-maintained.
Crossplane: What is Crossplane used for?
Crossplane is used to build control planes and platforms for infrastructure management, enabling platform teams to expose safe APIs to other teams.
SourceSoketi: Do I need to change my client code?
No. Pusher client SDKs and Laravel Echo work by changing the host, port and credentials.
Soketi: What does it cost?
Nothing in licence fees. It is MIT licensed; you pay for the server it runs on.
Soketi: What are people moving to?
Laravel Reverb for Laravel applications, and Sockudo, a Rust reimplementation, for others.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Crossplane vs Pulumi
- Crossplane vs containerd
- Crossplane vs Nitric
- Crossplane vs Vault
- Crossplane vs Portworx
- Crossplane vs Microsoft Azure
- Crossplane vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Crossplane vs DigitalOcean
- Crossplane vs Podman
- Crossplane vs K3s
- Crossplane vs OpenEBS
- Crossplane vs OVHcloud
- Crossplane vs Puppet
- Crossplane vs Cilium
- Crossplane vs Nomad
- Crossplane vs PartyKit
- Crossplane vs Penpot
- Crossplane vs Atlantis
- Crossplane vs Coder
- Crossplane vs Backstage
- Crossplane vs Visual Studio Code
- Crossplane vs GNU Emacs
- Crossplane vs Bazel
- Crossplane vs Eclipse IDE
- Crossplane vs Pants Build
- Crossplane vs Swagger UI
- Crossplane vs Ansible
- Crossplane vs Cody
- Crossplane vs ConfigCat
- Crossplane vs Cortex
- Crossplane vs Dagger
- Crossplane vs Deno
- Crossplane vs Fig
- Soketi vs Pulumi
- Soketi vs containerd
- Soketi vs Nitric
- Soketi vs Vault
- Soketi vs Portworx
- Soketi vs Microsoft Azure
- Soketi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Soketi vs DigitalOcean
- Soketi vs Podman
- Soketi vs K3s
- Soketi vs OpenEBS
- Soketi vs OVHcloud
- Soketi vs Puppet
- Soketi vs Cilium
- Soketi vs Nomad
- Soketi vs PartyKit
- Soketi vs Penpot
- Soketi vs Atlantis
- Soketi vs Coder
- Soketi vs Backstage
- Soketi vs Visual Studio Code
- Soketi vs GNU Emacs
- Soketi vs Bazel
- Soketi vs Eclipse IDE
- Soketi vs Pants Build
- Soketi vs Swagger UI
- Soketi vs Ansible
- Soketi vs Cody
- Soketi vs ConfigCat
- Soketi vs Cortex
- Soketi vs Dagger
- Soketi vs Deno
- Soketi vs Fig

