Software · head to head
CrashPlan vs Heroku

CrashPlan
Software
Endpoint backup designed for work-from-anywhere
- From
- $8/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CrashPlan initial data uploads can be noticeably slow, often taking several full days for complete system backups; Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- They diverge on capability: CrashPlan covers Automatic backup, Heroku covers Git-based deployment.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CrashPlan and Heroku actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CrashPlan
- Automatic backup
- Continuous protection
- Legal hold
- Centralized administration
- Unlimited storage
- AES 256-bit encryption
- Active Directory
- LDAP
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CrashPlan
- Data protectionnot Heroku
- Disaster recoverynot Heroku
- Business continuitynot Heroku
- Ransomware protectionnot Heroku
- Compliancenot Heroku
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot CrashPlan
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot CrashPlan
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot CrashPlan
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CrashPlan
- Initial data uploads can be noticeably slow, often taking several full days for complete system backups
- Occasional slow restore speeds for very large files impact recovery time objectives
- Full system recovery requires requesting hard drive delivery instead of bare-metal restore capability
- Difficulties reported with backing up or restoring data from external hard drives
- Pricing is higher than some competitors like Backblaze when compared per user/month
- Limited SIEM integration and governance reporting for enterprise environments
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Pricing, plan by plan
CrashPlan
$8/month- Professional (Monthly)$8/month
- Unlimited backup capacity
- Unlimited file versions
- 90-day deleted file retention
- Professional (Annual)$88/year
- All Monthly features
- $0.88 savings per month vs monthly billing
- Professional (2-Year)$158/2 years
- All features
- Lower per-month cost vs annual
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
Which should you pick?
Choose CrashPlan if
- You need automatic backup.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Cloud (Microsoft 365, Google Workspace).
- You also want continuous protection.
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Questions people ask
- Is CrashPlan or Heroku better?
- Neither clearly leads. CrashPlan starts at $8/month and Heroku at $7/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CrashPlan or Heroku?
- CrashPlan starts at $8/month and Heroku at $7/month.
- Does CrashPlan or Heroku run on more platforms?
- CrashPlan runs on Windows, macOS, Cloud (Microsoft 365, Google Workspace). Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers.
- What is CrashPlan best used for?
- CrashPlan is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Heroku is typically brought in for.
- What can CrashPlan do that Heroku cannot?
- CrashPlan covers Automatic backup, Continuous protection, Legal hold, Centralized administration. Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CrashPlan: What is CrashPlan's pricing for business backup?
CrashPlan Professional Edition costs $8 per user/month (billed monthly), $7.33 per user/month when billed annually ($88/year), or $158 per user for a 2-year commitment. This includes unlimited backup capacity, unlimited file versions, and 90-day deleted file retention.
SourceCrashPlan: Does CrashPlan offer a free trial?
Yes, CrashPlan offers a 14-day free trial. Credit card information is required for signup, but there will be no charge if you cancel during the trial period. Your credit card will be automatically charged when the trial ends unless you cancel.
SourceCrashPlan: What platforms and services does CrashPlan protect?
CrashPlan protects Windows and Mac endpoints, Microsoft 365 services (Exchange Online, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams), and Google Workspace (Gmail, Google Drive). The platform provides backup for endpoints, servers, and cloud applications.
SourceCrashPlan: Does CrashPlan have a free version for consumers?
No, CrashPlan discontinued its consumer personal backup tier and now focuses exclusively on commercial businesses. The platform is strictly for business and organizational use.
SourceCrashPlan: What is CrashPlan's partnership status with Microsoft?
CrashPlan is a trusted Microsoft Partner and is co-sell eligible. The platform is available in the Microsoft Marketplace and counts toward customers' Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment (MACC). CrashPlan is built on Microsoft Azure infrastructure.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- CrashPlan vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- CrashPlan vs Carbonite
- CrashPlan vs Backblaze
- CrashPlan vs Barracuda Backup
- CrashPlan vs Arq Backup
- CrashPlan vs Duplicati
- CrashPlan vs Zerto
- CrashPlan vs Box
- CrashPlan vs IDrive
- CrashPlan vs Microsoft OneDrive
- CrashPlan vs Nextcloud
- CrashPlan vs pCloud
- CrashPlan vs Sync.com
- CrashPlan vs Tresorit
- CrashPlan vs TrueNAS
- CrashPlan vs Veritas NetBackup
- CrashPlan vs Grafana Cloud
- CrashPlan vs Neon
- CrashPlan vs DigitalOcean
- CrashPlan vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- CrashPlan vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- CrashPlan vs Deno Deploy
- CrashPlan vs Hetzner Cloud
- CrashPlan vs Linode
- CrashPlan vs Packer
- CrashPlan vs Pulumi
- CrashPlan vs Render
- CrashPlan vs Upstash
- CrashPlan vs Vagrant
- CrashPlan vs Vultr
- CrashPlan vs Akamai
- CrashPlan vs Alibaba Cloud
- CrashPlan vs Chef
- CrashPlan vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Heroku vs Carbonite
- Heroku vs Backblaze
- Heroku vs Barracuda Backup
- Heroku vs Arq Backup
- Heroku vs Duplicati
- Heroku vs Zerto
- Heroku vs Box
- Heroku vs IDrive
- Heroku vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Heroku vs Nextcloud
- Heroku vs pCloud
- Heroku vs Sync.com
- Heroku vs Tresorit
- Heroku vs TrueNAS
- Heroku vs Veritas NetBackup
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo

