Software · head to head
Arq Backup vs Heroku

Arq Backup
Software
Mac and Windows backup to your own cloud storage
- From
- $50/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Arq Backup runs on Mac and Windows only; Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- They diverge on capability: Arq Backup covers Client-side encryption, Heroku covers Git-based deployment.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arq Backup and Heroku actually diverge.
| Attribute | Arq Backup | Heroku |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $50/year | $7/month |
| Platforms | Windows, Mac | Web, Api, Workers |
| Founded | 2009 | 2007 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arq Backup
- Client-side encryption
- Hourly backups
- Network backup
- Deduplication
- Immutable backups
- Budget controls
- Google Cloud
- Azure
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Both cover
- AWS S3
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arq Backup
- Data protectionnot Heroku
- Disaster recoverynot Heroku
- Business continuitynot Heroku
- Ransomware protectionnot Heroku
- Compliancenot Heroku
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot Arq Backup
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot Arq Backup
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot Arq Backup
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arq Backup
- Runs on Mac and Windows only
- Arq 7 is licensed per computer, and continuing to receive updates after the first year costs $25 per year per computer
- Arq Premium covers up to 5 computers, so larger households or teams need more than one subscription
- Arq Premium includes 1TB of storage and charges $0.0059 per GB per month beyond it
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Pricing, plan by plan
Arq Backup
$50/year- Arq Premium$50/year
- 5 computers
- Arq Cloud storage option
- Email support
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
Which should you pick?
Choose Arq Backup if
- You need client-side encryption.
- You work on Windows, Mac.
- You also want hourly backups.
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Questions people ask
- Is Arq Backup or Heroku better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arq Backup starts at $50/year and Heroku at $7/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arq Backup or Heroku?
- Arq Backup starts at $50/year and Heroku at $7/month.
- Does Arq Backup or Heroku run on more platforms?
- Arq Backup runs on Windows, Mac. Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers.
- What is Arq Backup best used for?
- Arq Backup is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Heroku is typically brought in for.
- What can Arq Backup do that Heroku cannot?
- Arq Backup covers Client-side encryption, Hourly backups, Network backup, Deduplication. Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Both handle AWS S3.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Arq Backup vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Arq Backup vs Carbonite
- Arq Backup vs Backblaze
- Arq Backup vs Barracuda Backup
- Arq Backup vs CrashPlan
- Arq Backup vs Duplicati
- Arq Backup vs Zerto
- Arq Backup vs Box
- Arq Backup vs IDrive
- Arq Backup vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Arq Backup vs Nextcloud
- Arq Backup vs pCloud
- Arq Backup vs Sync.com
- Arq Backup vs Tresorit
- Arq Backup vs TrueNAS
- Arq Backup vs Veritas NetBackup
- Arq Backup vs Grafana Cloud
- Arq Backup vs Neon
- Arq Backup vs DigitalOcean
- Arq Backup vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Arq Backup vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Arq Backup vs Deno Deploy
- Arq Backup vs Hetzner Cloud
- Arq Backup vs Linode
- Arq Backup vs Packer
- Arq Backup vs Pulumi
- Arq Backup vs Render
- Arq Backup vs Upstash
- Arq Backup vs Vagrant
- Arq Backup vs Vultr
- Arq Backup vs Akamai
- Arq Backup vs Alibaba Cloud
- Arq Backup vs Chef
- Arq Backup vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Heroku vs Carbonite
- Heroku vs Backblaze
- Heroku vs Barracuda Backup
- Heroku vs CrashPlan
- Heroku vs Duplicati
- Heroku vs Zerto
- Heroku vs Box
- Heroku vs IDrive
- Heroku vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Heroku vs Nextcloud
- Heroku vs pCloud
- Heroku vs Sync.com
- Heroku vs Tresorit
- Heroku vs TrueNAS
- Heroku vs Veritas NetBackup
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo

