Software · head to head
Heroku vs Sync.com

Sync.com
Software
Cloud storage, backup and sharing with end-to-end encryption
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; Sync.com all Teams plans require a minimum of 3 users
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and Sync.com actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Only in Sync.com
Nothing recorded that Heroku does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot Sync.com
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot Sync.com
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot Sync.com
Sync.com
No use cases recorded yet. See the Sync.com review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Sync.com
- All Teams plans require a minimum of 3 users
- The advertised low monthly rate (e.g. $4/month for Teams 1TB) is a promotional annual rate described as 50% off; the standard monthly price is $8/month without the promotion
- Enterprise pricing for 100+ users is custom and requires contacting a dedicated account manager
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
Sync.com
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Sync.com review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Choose Sync.com if
Nothing in the data separates Sync.com from Heroku on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or Sync.com better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $7/month and Sync.com at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or Sync.com?
- Heroku starts at $7/month and Sync.com at On request.
- Does Heroku or Sync.com run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. Sync.com runs on Web.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration, running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services, isolated production environments in a private space for regulated workloads. Of those, deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration and running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services are not what Sync.com is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that Sync.com cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Heroku vs Carbonite
- Heroku vs Backblaze
- Heroku vs Barracuda Backup
- Heroku vs Arq Backup
- Heroku vs CrashPlan
- Heroku vs Duplicati
- Heroku vs Zerto
- Heroku vs Box
- Heroku vs IDrive
- Heroku vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Heroku vs Nextcloud
- Heroku vs pCloud
- Heroku vs Tresorit
- Heroku vs TrueNAS
- Heroku vs Veritas NetBackup
- Sync.com vs Grafana Cloud
- Sync.com vs Neon
- Sync.com vs DigitalOcean
- Sync.com vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Sync.com vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Sync.com vs Deno Deploy
- Sync.com vs Hetzner Cloud
- Sync.com vs Linode
- Sync.com vs Packer
- Sync.com vs Pulumi
- Sync.com vs Render
- Sync.com vs Upstash
- Sync.com vs Vagrant
- Sync.com vs Vultr
- Sync.com vs Akamai
- Sync.com vs Alibaba Cloud
- Sync.com vs Chef
- Sync.com vs Contabo
- Sync.com vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Sync.com vs Carbonite
- Sync.com vs Backblaze
- Sync.com vs Barracuda Backup
- Sync.com vs Arq Backup
- Sync.com vs CrashPlan
- Sync.com vs Duplicati
- Sync.com vs Zerto
- Sync.com vs Box
- Sync.com vs IDrive
- Sync.com vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Sync.com vs Nextcloud
- Sync.com vs pCloud
- Sync.com vs Tresorit
- Sync.com vs TrueNAS
- Sync.com vs Veritas NetBackup

