Software · head to head
Heroku vs TrueNAS

TrueNAS
Software
Open-source ZFS storage operating system for network-attached storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only TrueNAS has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; TrueNAS requires self-hosting on x86 hardware, no managed cloud offering; organisations must provision, configure, and maintain their own infrastructure
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and TrueNAS actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Only in TrueNAS
Nothing recorded that Heroku does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot TrueNAS
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot TrueNAS
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot TrueNAS
TrueNAS
- On-premises backup and archival storage for enterprisesnot Heroku
- Home lab and small business network-attached storagenot Heroku
- Media server storage for video, photo, and document librariesnot Heroku
- Disaster recovery and business continuity replicationnot Heroku
- S3-compatible object storage for cloud-native applicationsnot Heroku
- High-availability storage clusters for datacentresnot Heroku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
TrueNAS
- Requires self-hosting on x86 hardware, no managed cloud offering; organisations must provision, configure, and maintain their own infrastructure
- ZFS filesystem entails high memory requirements (1 GB RAM per 1 TB of storage recommended), increasing costs for large deployments
- Limited ARM/embedded support; Community Edition is primarily x86-64, reducing deployment options for edge installations
- Clustering and replication setup requires operational expertise; misconfiguration can lead to data loss
- Enterprise support and SLA guarantees require paid subscriptions; Community Edition relies on peer-based forums
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
TrueNAS
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the TrueNAS review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Choose TrueNAS if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Linux, Web, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or TrueNAS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $7/month and TrueNAS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or TrueNAS?
- TrueNAS has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $7/month for Heroku and Free for TrueNAS.
- Does Heroku or TrueNAS run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. TrueNAS runs on Self-hosted, Linux, Web, API.
- Can I use TrueNAS for free?
- Yes. TrueNAS has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Heroku starts at $7/month.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration, running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services, isolated production environments in a private space for regulated workloads. Of those, deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration and running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services are not what TrueNAS is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that TrueNAS cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
TrueNAS: What is the cost of TrueNAS Community Edition?
TrueNAS Community Edition is free and open-source. There are no licensing fees, but organisations must purchase and maintain their own x86 hardware. Enterprise Edition requires paid support contracts for production environments.
SourceTrueNAS: Can I replicate TrueNAS data between sites?
Yes. TrueNAS supports snapshot-based replication over network links, enabling disaster recovery and business continuity. Replication can occur between Community Edition systems or between Enterprise Appliances.
SourceTrueNAS: What storage protocols does TrueNAS support?
TrueNAS simultaneously supports NFS (network file system), SMB (Windows file sharing), iSCSI (block storage), and S3-compatible object storage, all from the same storage pool.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Heroku vs Carbonite
- Heroku vs Backblaze
- Heroku vs Barracuda Backup
- Heroku vs Arq Backup
- Heroku vs CrashPlan
- Heroku vs Duplicati
- Heroku vs Zerto
- Heroku vs Box
- Heroku vs IDrive
- Heroku vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Heroku vs Nextcloud
- Heroku vs pCloud
- Heroku vs Sync.com
- Heroku vs Tresorit
- Heroku vs Veritas NetBackup
- TrueNAS vs Grafana Cloud
- TrueNAS vs Neon
- TrueNAS vs DigitalOcean
- TrueNAS vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- TrueNAS vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- TrueNAS vs Deno Deploy
- TrueNAS vs Hetzner Cloud
- TrueNAS vs Linode
- TrueNAS vs Packer
- TrueNAS vs Pulumi
- TrueNAS vs Render
- TrueNAS vs Upstash
- TrueNAS vs Vagrant
- TrueNAS vs Vultr
- TrueNAS vs Akamai
- TrueNAS vs Alibaba Cloud
- TrueNAS vs Chef
- TrueNAS vs Contabo
- TrueNAS vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- TrueNAS vs Carbonite
- TrueNAS vs Backblaze
- TrueNAS vs Barracuda Backup
- TrueNAS vs Arq Backup
- TrueNAS vs CrashPlan
- TrueNAS vs Duplicati
- TrueNAS vs Zerto
- TrueNAS vs Box
- TrueNAS vs IDrive
- TrueNAS vs Microsoft OneDrive
- TrueNAS vs Nextcloud
- TrueNAS vs pCloud
- TrueNAS vs Sync.com
- TrueNAS vs Tresorit
- TrueNAS vs Veritas NetBackup

