Software · head to head
Heroku vs Zerto
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; Zerto zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
- They diverge on capability: Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Zerto covers Continuous data protection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and Zerto actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Only in Zerto
- Continuous data protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Automated failover
- Non-disruptive testing
- Multi-cloud mobility
- Long-term retention
- VMware
- Hyper-V
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot Zerto
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot Zerto
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot Zerto
Zerto
- Data protectionnot Heroku
- Disaster recoverynot Heroku
- Business continuitynot Heroku
- Ransomware protectionnot Heroku
- Compliancenot Heroku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Zerto
- Zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
Zerto
$5/month- Zerto Enterprise Cloud$5/month
- Continuous protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Multi-cloud mobility
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Choose Zerto if
- You need continuous data protection.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want journal-based recovery.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or Zerto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $7/month and Zerto at $5/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or Zerto?
- Heroku starts at $7/month and Zerto at $5/month.
- Does Heroku or Zerto run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. Zerto runs on Windows, Linux, Web.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration, running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services, isolated production environments in a private space for regulated workloads. Of those, deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration and running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services are not what Zerto is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that Zerto cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Zerto covers Continuous data protection, Journal-based recovery, Automated failover, Non-disruptive testing. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Heroku vs Carbonite
- Heroku vs Backblaze
- Heroku vs Barracuda Backup
- Heroku vs Arq Backup
- Heroku vs CrashPlan
- Heroku vs Duplicati
- Heroku vs Box
- Heroku vs IDrive
- Heroku vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Heroku vs Nextcloud
- Heroku vs pCloud
- Heroku vs Sync.com
- Heroku vs Tresorit
- Heroku vs TrueNAS
- Heroku vs Veritas NetBackup
- Zerto vs Grafana Cloud
- Zerto vs Neon
- Zerto vs DigitalOcean
- Zerto vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zerto vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zerto vs Deno Deploy
- Zerto vs Hetzner Cloud
- Zerto vs Linode
- Zerto vs Packer
- Zerto vs Pulumi
- Zerto vs Render
- Zerto vs Upstash
- Zerto vs Vagrant
- Zerto vs Vultr
- Zerto vs Akamai
- Zerto vs Alibaba Cloud
- Zerto vs Chef
- Zerto vs Contabo
- Zerto vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Zerto vs Carbonite
- Zerto vs Backblaze
- Zerto vs Barracuda Backup
- Zerto vs Arq Backup
- Zerto vs CrashPlan
- Zerto vs Duplicati
- Zerto vs Box
- Zerto vs IDrive
- Zerto vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Zerto vs Nextcloud
- Zerto vs pCloud
- Zerto vs Sync.com
- Zerto vs Tresorit
- Zerto vs TrueNAS
- Zerto vs Veritas NetBackup


