AI · head to head
CoreWeave vs Wasabi
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CoreWeave gPU nodes are sold as full 8 GPU instances rather than single cards, so the entry cost for an H100 node is $49.24 an hour on demand; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: CoreWeave covers NVIDIA H100/A100, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CoreWeave and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CoreWeave
- NVIDIA H100/A100
- Kubernetes native
- High bandwidth
- Object storage
- Kubernetes
- Terraform
- Cloud APIs
- Cloud support
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CoreWeave
- Renting GPU compute for model training and inferencenot Wasabi
- Running large scale AI workloads without buying hardwarenot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot CoreWeave
- Media storagenot CoreWeave
- Archive replacementnot CoreWeave
- Ransomware protectionnot CoreWeave
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CoreWeave
- GPU nodes are sold as full 8 GPU instances rather than single cards, so the entry cost for an H100 node is $49.24 an hour on demand
- Spot pricing is roughly 40% of on demand, at $19.71 an hour for the same H100 node, so predictable capacity carries a large premium
- The newest hardware carries no published price and requires contacting sales
- Discounts of up to 60% require committed usage agreements negotiated with sales
- Only the GH200 is offered as a single GPU instance
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
CoreWeave
$0.35/per-hour- Standard$0.35/per-hour
- Various GPU types
- Kubernetes
- EnterpriseFree
- Dedicated clusters
- Custom solutions
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose CoreWeave if
- You need nvidia h100/a100.
- You work on Cloud.
- You also want kubernetes native.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is CoreWeave or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. CoreWeave starts at $0.35/per-hour and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CoreWeave or Wasabi?
- CoreWeave starts at $0.35/per-hour and Wasabi at $7.99/month.
- Does CoreWeave or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- CoreWeave runs on Cloud. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- What is CoreWeave best used for?
- CoreWeave is most often used for renting gpu compute for model training and inference, running large scale ai workloads without buying hardware. Of those, renting gpu compute for model training and inference and running large scale ai workloads without buying hardware are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can CoreWeave do that Wasabi cannot?
- CoreWeave covers NVIDIA H100/A100, Kubernetes native, High bandwidth, Object storage. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CoreWeave: How much does CoreWeave cost?
CoreWeave does not publish pricing on its website. The company uses a quote-based pricing model and directs customers to contact their sales team directly to discuss pricing options and customized solutions.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceCoreWeave: How can I get a quote from CoreWeave?
To obtain CoreWeave pricing, you must contact their sales team directly through the Contact Us option on their website. They will provide a customized quote based on your specific compute and infrastructure requirements.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CoreWeave vs Anthropic API
- CoreWeave vs Pika
- CoreWeave vs D-ID
- CoreWeave vs Fathom
- CoreWeave vs Lambda Labs
- CoreWeave vs Modal
- CoreWeave vs RunPod
- CoreWeave vs Banana
- CoreWeave vs Replicate
- CoreWeave vs AI21 Labs
- CoreWeave vs Sourcegraph Cody
- CoreWeave vs Tabnine
- CoreWeave vs Aider
- CoreWeave vs Leonardo AI
- CoreWeave vs Murf
- CoreWeave vs Pi
- CoreWeave vs Play.ht
- CoreWeave vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- CoreWeave vs DigitalOcean
- CoreWeave vs Hetzner Cloud
- CoreWeave vs Scaleway
- CoreWeave vs Linode
- CoreWeave vs Vultr
- CoreWeave vs Zeabur
- CoreWeave vs Porter
- CoreWeave vs Contabo
- CoreWeave vs Encore
- CoreWeave vs Google Cloud Platform
- CoreWeave vs Microsoft Azure
- CoreWeave vs HAProxy
- CoreWeave vs IBM Cloud
- CoreWeave vs kind
- CoreWeave vs Koyeb
- CoreWeave vs Kustomize
- CoreWeave vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Anthropic API
- Wasabi vs Pika
- Wasabi vs D-ID
- Wasabi vs Fathom
- Wasabi vs Lambda Labs
- Wasabi vs Modal
- Wasabi vs RunPod
- Wasabi vs Banana
- Wasabi vs Replicate
- Wasabi vs AI21 Labs
- Wasabi vs Sourcegraph Cody
- Wasabi vs Tabnine
- Wasabi vs Aider
- Wasabi vs Leonardo AI
- Wasabi vs Murf
- Wasabi vs Pi
- Wasabi vs Play.ht
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd


