CAD · head to head
CoreTechnologie vs Rhino 3D

CoreTechnologie
CAD
CAD format conversion, validation and additive build preparation from a German independent
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Rhino 3D has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CoreTechnologie no pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.; Rhino 3D windows-only for certain features including 3D digitizing hardware support
- They diverge on capability: CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, Rhino 3D covers NURBS modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CoreTechnologie and Rhino 3D actually diverge.
| Attribute | CoreTechnologie | Rhino 3D |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | one-time |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Windows, Mac, iOS |
| Founded | Unknown | 1980 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CoreTechnologie
- Native CAD conversion
- Automatic geometry healing
- Feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- Batch and server conversion
- 3D_Analyzer
- 4D_Additive B-rep printing
Only in Rhino 3D
- NURBS modeling
- Surface modeling
- 3D visualization
- Grasshopper
- Rendering
- Grasshopper
- KeyShot
- V-Ray
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CoreTechnologie
- A tier supplier that receives CATIA from one customer and NX from another and must work in SolidWorksnot Rhino 3D
- A company migrating a CAD library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solidsnot Rhino 3D
- Preparing additive builds from exact B-rep geometry where STL faceting would lose the tolerance you neednot Rhino 3D
- Giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them CAD seatsnot Rhino 3D
Rhino 3D
- NURBS-based 3D modelling for product design and engineeringnot CoreTechnologie
- Precision engineering and prototyping (aerospace, automotive, jewellery)not CoreTechnologie
- Generative design with Grasshopper visual programmingnot CoreTechnologie
- Mesh editing and point cloud processingnot CoreTechnologie
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CoreTechnologie
- No pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.
- Licensing is granular by format read and write pair, so the price you were quoted covers the translations you named and adding a customer with a different CAD platform later means going back for another line item.
- It is a small independent vendor, so a buyer standardising a critical migration pipeline on it should weigh the concentration risk and check the support arrangement in their own region rather than assume global coverage.
- Feature recognition on converted geometry works well on prismatic machined parts and much less well on complex freeform surfaces, so the rebuilt-as-editable claim needs testing on your own worst parts, not on a demo model.
- 4D_Additive competes with entrenched incumbents such as Magics in industrial AM, so machine-side Build Processor support and bureau familiarity are thinner, which matters if you need your service provider to accept the output.
Rhino 3D
- Windows-only for certain features including 3D digitizing hardware support
- Performance depends on hardware capabilities; complex projects require better equipment
- Pre-release/Work-in-Progress builds may contain bugs and are not production ready
Pricing, plan by plan
CoreTechnologie
On request- 3D_Evolution$undefined/year
- Native CAD conversion across around 36 formats
- Automatic healing and feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- 3D_Analyzer$undefined/year
- Cross-format viewing and measurement
- Wall thickness, draft and collision analysis
- Model comparison
- 4D_Additive$undefined/year
- B-rep based build preparation
- Texturing, nesting and lattice structures
- Automatic part analysis for printability
Rhino 3D
Free- EvaluationFree
- 90-day trial
- All features included
- No credit card required
- Student License$195/mo
- Perpetual license
- Support included
- Service releases
- Commercial License$995/mo
- Perpetual license
- Support included
- Service releases
- Student Upgrade$95/mo
- Perpetual license
- Requires prior license key
- Support included
Which should you pick?
Choose CoreTechnologie if
- You need native cad conversion.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want automatic geometry healing.
Choose Rhino 3D if
- You need nurbs modeling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Mac, iOS.
- You also want surface modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is CoreTechnologie or Rhino 3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. CoreTechnologie starts at On request and Rhino 3D at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CoreTechnologie or Rhino 3D?
- Rhino 3D has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for CoreTechnologie and Free for Rhino 3D.
- Does CoreTechnologie or Rhino 3D run on more platforms?
- CoreTechnologie runs on Windows, Linux. Rhino 3D runs on Windows, Mac, iOS.
- Can I use Rhino 3D for free?
- Yes. Rhino 3D has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CoreTechnologie starts at On request.
- What is CoreTechnologie best used for?
- CoreTechnologie is most often used for a tier supplier that receives catia from one customer and nx from another and must work in solidworks, a company migrating a cad library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solids, preparing additive builds from exact b-rep geometry where stl faceting would lose the tolerance you need, giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them cad seats. Of those, a tier supplier that receives catia from one customer and nx from another and must work in solidworks and a company migrating a cad library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solids are not what Rhino 3D is typically brought in for.
- What can CoreTechnologie do that Rhino 3D cannot?
- CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, Automatic geometry healing, Feature recognition, Simplification and defeaturing. Rhino 3D covers NURBS modeling, Surface modeling, 3D visualization, Grasshopper.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CoreTechnologie: Is CoreTechnologie owned by a CAD vendor?
No. It is an independent German company, which is the main reason it appears in supply chains that must move data between competing CAD platforms.
Rhino 3D: How much does Rhino 3D cost?
Student licenses cost EUR 195, commercial licenses cost EUR 995. Both are perpetual one-time purchases. Upgrades from prior versions cost EUR 95 for students and EUR 595 for commercial users.
SourceCoreTechnologie: Does conversion produce editable models?
3D_Evolution has feature recognition that rebuilds parametric features from solids. It is reliable on prismatic machined geometry and weaker on complex freeform surfaces, so test it on your hardest parts.
Rhino 3D: Is there a free trial?
Yes, a 90-day evaluation license is available free with no credit card required. Full features are included and commercial use is allowed.
SourceCoreTechnologie: What makes 4D_Additive different from a normal slicer?
It prepares builds on exact B-rep geometry rather than converting to STL first, so tolerance and surface accuracy are not lost to faceting before printing.
Rhino 3D: Can Rhino 3D licenses be shared across multiple users?
Commercial versions support floating licenses that can be shared. Student licenses are limited to single-user perpetual licenses. All licenses include support and service releases.
SourceCoreTechnologie: Can it run unattended for large migrations?
Yes. Batch and server conversion is designed for high-volume migration and PLM pipeline use rather than desk-by-desk conversion.
Related pages
More on CoreTechnologie
Other head to heads
- CoreTechnologie vs FreeCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Siemens NX
- CoreTechnologie vs CATIA
- CoreTechnologie vs nTop
- CoreTechnologie vs ANSYS Fluent
- CoreTechnologie vs Bambu Studio
- CoreTechnologie vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- CoreTechnologie vs MicroSurvey CAD
- CoreTechnologie vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley MicroStation
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- CoreTechnologie vs BricsCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Arnold
- CoreTechnologie vs Carlson Software
- CoreTechnologie vs Corona Renderer
- CoreTechnologie vs Inventor
- CoreTechnologie vs Mudbox
- CoreTechnologie vs Plasticity
- CoreTechnologie vs IronCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Tinkercad
- CoreTechnologie vs CloudCompare
- CoreTechnologie vs V-Ray
- CoreTechnologie vs KeyShot
- CoreTechnologie vs Twinmotion
- CoreTechnologie vs Houdini
- CoreTechnologie vs Modo
- CoreTechnologie vs KiCad
- CoreTechnologie vs Redshift
- Rhino 3D vs FreeCAD
- Rhino 3D vs Siemens NX
- Rhino 3D vs CATIA
- Rhino 3D vs nTop
- Rhino 3D vs ANSYS Fluent
- Rhino 3D vs Bambu Studio
- Rhino 3D vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- Rhino 3D vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Rhino 3D vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Rhino 3D vs Bentley MicroStation
- Rhino 3D vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Rhino 3D vs BricsCAD
- Rhino 3D vs Arnold
- Rhino 3D vs Carlson Software
- Rhino 3D vs Corona Renderer
- Rhino 3D vs Inventor
- Rhino 3D vs Mudbox
- Rhino 3D vs Plasticity
- Rhino 3D vs IronCAD
- Rhino 3D vs Tinkercad
- Rhino 3D vs CloudCompare
- Rhino 3D vs V-Ray
- Rhino 3D vs KeyShot
- Rhino 3D vs Twinmotion
- Rhino 3D vs Houdini
- Rhino 3D vs Modo
- Rhino 3D vs KiCad
- Rhino 3D vs Redshift

