CAD · head to head
CoreTechnologie vs Markforged Eiger

CoreTechnologie
CAD
CAD format conversion, validation and additive build preparation from a German independent
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Markforged Eiger
Manufacturing
Free cloud print preparation for Markforged printers, because the money is in the hardware
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Markforged Eiger has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CoreTechnologie no pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.; Markforged Eiger eiger only drives Markforged printers, so the free software is a lock-in mechanism; the moment you want a different machine none of your prepared parts or fibre routing transfers.
- They diverge on capability: CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, Markforged Eiger covers Continuous fibre routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CoreTechnologie and Markforged Eiger actually diverge.
| Attribute | CoreTechnologie | Markforged Eiger |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Web, Windows, macOS, Cloud |
| Category | CAD | Manufacturing |
Identical on both: pricing model (quote), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CoreTechnologie
- Native CAD conversion
- Automatic geometry healing
- Feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- Batch and server conversion
- 3D_Analyzer
- 4D_Additive B-rep printing
Only in Markforged Eiger
- Continuous fibre routing
- Cloud slicing
- Fleet management
- Part library
- Material tracking
- Simulation add-on
- Eiger Offline
- Access control
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CoreTechnologie
- A tier supplier that receives CATIA from one customer and NX from another and must work in SolidWorksnot Markforged Eiger
- A company migrating a CAD library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solidsnot Markforged Eiger
- Preparing additive builds from exact B-rep geometry where STL faceting would lose the tolerance you neednot Markforged Eiger
- Giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them CAD seatsnot Markforged Eiger
Markforged Eiger
- A tooling department printing carbon fibre reinforced jigs and fixtures strong enough to replace machined aluminiumnot CoreTechnologie
- A defence contractor needing air-gapped print preparation because part geometry cannot leave the site, which requires Eiger Offlinenot CoreTechnologie
- A manufacturing engineering group running several Markforged machines across sites from one queue and part librarynot CoreTechnologie
- A maintenance team producing reinforced replacement brackets on demand rather than holding sparesnot CoreTechnologie
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CoreTechnologie
- No pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.
- Licensing is granular by format read and write pair, so the price you were quoted covers the translations you named and adding a customer with a different CAD platform later means going back for another line item.
- It is a small independent vendor, so a buyer standardising a critical migration pipeline on it should weigh the concentration risk and check the support arrangement in their own region rather than assume global coverage.
- Feature recognition on converted geometry works well on prismatic machined parts and much less well on complex freeform surfaces, so the rebuilt-as-editable claim needs testing on your own worst parts, not on a demo model.
- 4D_Additive competes with entrenched incumbents such as Magics in industrial AM, so machine-side Build Processor support and bureau familiarity are thinner, which matters if you need your service provider to accept the output.
Markforged Eiger
- Eiger only drives Markforged printers, so the free software is a lock-in mechanism; the moment you want a different machine none of your prepared parts or fibre routing transfers.
- The standard product is cloud only, meaning part geometry is uploaded to a vendor service, which is unacceptable for many defence and aerospace sites and forces them onto the paid Eiger Offline subscription per machine.
- Eiger Offline pricing is not published and is charged per machine, so a shop with several printers pays repeatedly for software the cloud users receive free.
- Slicing control is deliberately simplified compared with open slicers, and experienced operators regularly find they cannot reach a parameter they want without contacting support.
- Markforged has been through financial pressure and consolidation in the additive sector, and because the software is inseparable from the hardware, a change of ownership or product line pruning would strand the fleet rather than just the tool.
Pricing, plan by plan
CoreTechnologie
On request- 3D_Evolution$undefined/year
- Native CAD conversion across around 36 formats
- Automatic healing and feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- 3D_Analyzer$undefined/year
- Cross-format viewing and measurement
- Wall thickness, draft and collision analysis
- Model comparison
- 4D_Additive$undefined/year
- B-rep based build preparation
- Texturing, nesting and lattice structures
- Automatic part analysis for printability
Markforged Eiger
Free- Eiger Basic$undefined/year
- Included at no additional charge with every Markforged printer
- No per-user or per-printer software fee
- Cloud print preparation and fleet management
- Eiger Offline$undefined/year
- Air-gapped installation for secure and classified environments
- Sold per machine on subscription
- Quarterly feature and material updates
Which should you pick?
Choose CoreTechnologie if
- You need native cad conversion.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want automatic geometry healing.
Choose Markforged Eiger if
- You need continuous fibre routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
- You also want cloud slicing.
Questions people ask
- Is CoreTechnologie or Markforged Eiger better?
- Neither clearly leads. CoreTechnologie starts at On request and Markforged Eiger at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CoreTechnologie or Markforged Eiger?
- Markforged Eiger has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for CoreTechnologie and Free for Markforged Eiger.
- Does CoreTechnologie or Markforged Eiger run on more platforms?
- CoreTechnologie runs on Windows, Linux. Markforged Eiger runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
- Can I use Markforged Eiger for free?
- Yes. Markforged Eiger has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CoreTechnologie starts at On request.
- What is CoreTechnologie best used for?
- CoreTechnologie is most often used for a tier supplier that receives catia from one customer and nx from another and must work in solidworks, a company migrating a cad library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solids, preparing additive builds from exact b-rep geometry where stl faceting would lose the tolerance you need, giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them cad seats. Of those, a tier supplier that receives catia from one customer and nx from another and must work in solidworks and a company migrating a cad library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solids are not what Markforged Eiger is typically brought in for.
- What can CoreTechnologie do that Markforged Eiger cannot?
- CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, Automatic geometry healing, Feature recognition, Simplification and defeaturing. Markforged Eiger covers Continuous fibre routing, Cloud slicing, Fleet management, Part library.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CoreTechnologie: Is CoreTechnologie owned by a CAD vendor?
No. It is an independent German company, which is the main reason it appears in supply chains that must move data between competing CAD platforms.
Markforged Eiger: How much does Eiger cost?
Nothing, if you own a Markforged printer. It is included with every machine with no per-user or per-printer software fee. Eiger Offline is a separate paid per-machine subscription.
CoreTechnologie: Does conversion produce editable models?
3D_Evolution has feature recognition that rebuilds parametric features from solids. It is reliable on prismatic machined geometry and weaker on complex freeform surfaces, so test it on your hardest parts.
Markforged Eiger: Can I use Eiger with a non-Markforged printer?
No. It only prepares and drives Markforged machines.
CoreTechnologie: What makes 4D_Additive different from a normal slicer?
It prepares builds on exact B-rep geometry rather than converting to STL first, so tolerance and surface accuracy are not lost to faceting before printing.
Markforged Eiger: Is my part geometry uploaded to the cloud?
Yes, in the standard product. Sites that cannot allow that need Eiger Offline.
CoreTechnologie: Can it run unattended for large migrations?
Yes. Batch and server conversion is designed for high-volume migration and PLM pipeline use rather than desk-by-desk conversion.
Markforged Eiger: Where is the actual cost then?
In the printers and the proprietary filament and continuous fibre spools, which are the recurring spend.
Related pages
More on CoreTechnologie
More on Markforged Eiger
Other head to heads
- CoreTechnologie vs FreeCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Siemens NX
- CoreTechnologie vs CATIA
- CoreTechnologie vs nTop
- CoreTechnologie vs ANSYS Fluent
- CoreTechnologie vs Bambu Studio
- CoreTechnologie vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- CoreTechnologie vs MicroSurvey CAD
- CoreTechnologie vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley MicroStation
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- CoreTechnologie vs BricsCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Arnold
- CoreTechnologie vs Carlson Software
- CoreTechnologie vs Corona Renderer
- CoreTechnologie vs Inventor
- CoreTechnologie vs Mudbox
- CoreTechnologie vs Fusion 360
- CoreTechnologie vs GrabCAD Print
- CoreTechnologie vs Formlabs PreForm
- CoreTechnologie vs Simplify3D
- CoreTechnologie vs Materialise Magics
- CoreTechnologie vs Oqton
- CoreTechnologie vs Dyndrite
- CoreTechnologie vs Xometry
- CoreTechnologie vs Protolabs
- CoreTechnologie vs 3YOURMIND
- CoreTechnologie vs AMFG
- CoreTechnologie vs PROGNOST Systems
- CoreTechnologie vs Propel
- CoreTechnologie vs ProShop ERP
- CoreTechnologie vs PTC Windchill
- CoreTechnologie vs Autodesk Netfabb
- CoreTechnologie vs Prodsmart
- Markforged Eiger vs FreeCAD
- Markforged Eiger vs Siemens NX
- Markforged Eiger vs CATIA
- Markforged Eiger vs nTop
- Markforged Eiger vs ANSYS Fluent
- Markforged Eiger vs Bambu Studio
- Markforged Eiger vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- Markforged Eiger vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Markforged Eiger vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Markforged Eiger vs Bentley MicroStation
- Markforged Eiger vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Markforged Eiger vs BricsCAD
- Markforged Eiger vs Arnold
- Markforged Eiger vs Carlson Software
- Markforged Eiger vs Corona Renderer
- Markforged Eiger vs Inventor
- Markforged Eiger vs Mudbox
- Markforged Eiger vs Fusion 360
- Markforged Eiger vs GrabCAD Print
- Markforged Eiger vs Formlabs PreForm
- Markforged Eiger vs Simplify3D
- Markforged Eiger vs Materialise Magics
- Markforged Eiger vs Oqton
- Markforged Eiger vs Dyndrite
- Markforged Eiger vs Xometry
- Markforged Eiger vs Protolabs
- Markforged Eiger vs 3YOURMIND
- Markforged Eiger vs AMFG
- Markforged Eiger vs PROGNOST Systems
- Markforged Eiger vs Propel
- Markforged Eiger vs ProShop ERP
- Markforged Eiger vs PTC Windchill
- Markforged Eiger vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Markforged Eiger vs Prodsmart
