Cloud · head to head
Coolify vs Timeplus

Coolify
Cloud
Open source self-hosted platform that deploys applications and databases to servers you already own
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Timeplus
Databases
Streaming SQL engine built on ClickHouse internals, shipping as one small binary
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Coolify commit history since June 2026 shows one maintainer at 73 commits and a second at 15 with nobody else above one, and the same two people also ship four other coolLabs products, so the project depends on a very small number of individuals.; Timeplus proton, the free version, is single-node by design, so any requirement for high availability or horizontal scale forces the commercial licence; the open source edition is a trial in practical terms.
- They diverge on capability: Coolify covers Git push deployments, Timeplus covers Streaming SQL.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Coolify and Timeplus actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Coolify
- Git push deployments
- One-click services
- Automatic certificates
- Managed databases
- Docker Compose support
- Notifications
Only in Timeplus
- Streaming SQL
- Unified streaming and historical
- ClickHouse-based engine
- Single binary deployment
- External streams
- Materialised views
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Coolify
- Replacing a managed platform bill with a single Hetzner or DigitalOcean instance running a dozen small applicationsnot Timeplus
- An agency hosting many low-traffic client sites on shared servers with certificates handled automaticallynot Timeplus
- Self-hosting analytics, databases and internal tools from the one-click catalogue without writing Compose filesnot Timeplus
- Deploying inside a country or jurisdiction where no managed platform operates a regionnot Timeplus
Timeplus
- Real-time alerting on Kafka topics where standing up a Flink cluster is more work than the use case justifiesnot Coolify
- Fraud or anomaly detection that must join a live event stream against recent history in one querynot Coolify
- Streaming ETL from Kafka or MySQL change data capture into ClickHouse without writing Javanot Coolify
- A small data team that needs continuous aggregation but has no platform engineers to operate JVM infrastructurenot Coolify
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Coolify
- Commit history since June 2026 shows one maintainer at 73 commits and a second at 15 with nobody else above one, and the same two people also ship four other coolLabs products, so the project depends on a very small number of individuals.
- Multi-server support is documented as experimental, load balancer configuration is manual, every server must share the same CPU architecture, and moving images between hosts requires you to run your own Docker registry.
- In self-hosted mode the Coolify machine holds every SSH key and secret with no documented high availability, so the dashboard host is a single point of failure that the paid Cloud tier fixes and self-hosting does not.
- Scheduled S3 backups cover PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB and MongoDB only, so application persistent volumes are your responsibility and a restore is untested unless you test it yourself.
- Release cadence is fast enough that six patch versions shipped inside ten days in August 2026 against several hundred open issues, and because instances can update themselves a regression can reach a production host before you have read the changelog.
Timeplus
- Proton, the free version, is single-node by design, so any requirement for high availability or horizontal scale forces the commercial licence; the open source edition is a trial in practical terms.
- It is a young project against Apache Flink’s decade of production history, so the hiring pool, the connector library and the body of known failure modes are all much smaller.
- Inheriting ClickHouse internals also inherits ClickHouse constraints: memory-hungry queries, awkward updates and a SQL dialect that is not portable to other engines.
- Exactly-once semantics and state recovery guarantees are less battle-tested than Flink checkpointing, which matters if the pipeline moves money.
- Cloud pricing is by provisioned instance size rather than usage, so a bursty workload pays for peak capacity around the clock or has to be resized by hand.
Pricing, plan by plan
Coolify
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Apache-2.0, no features held back
- Unlimited servers, applications and users
- You run, update and back up the dashboard yourself
- Cloud$5/month
- Connects 2 servers, then 3 US dollars a month per extra server
- Managed and updated Coolify dashboard with high availability
- Managed backups of the Coolify instance itself
Timeplus
Free- Timeplus ProtonFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Single node only
- Full streaming SQL engine
- Timeplus Cloud$199/month
- One to thirty-two CPUs
- 4 GB to 128 GB memory
- From 250 GB SSD storage
- Self-hosted or BYOC$undefined/year
- Multi-node clustering
- Kubernetes or bare metal
- Customisable compute and storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Coolify if
- You need git push deployments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want one-click services.
Choose Timeplus if
- You need streaming sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want unified streaming and historical.
Questions people ask
- Is Coolify or Timeplus better?
- Neither clearly leads. Coolify starts at Free and Timeplus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Coolify or Timeplus?
- Coolify starts at Free and Timeplus at Free.
- Does Coolify or Timeplus run on more platforms?
- Coolify runs on Web, Linux, Docker, Self-hosted. Timeplus runs on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Coolify for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Coolify best used for?
- Coolify is most often used for replacing a managed platform bill with a single hetzner or digitalocean instance running a dozen small applications, an agency hosting many low-traffic client sites on shared servers with certificates handled automatically, self-hosting analytics, databases and internal tools from the one-click catalogue without writing compose files, deploying inside a country or jurisdiction where no managed platform operates a region. Of those, replacing a managed platform bill with a single hetzner or digitalocean instance running a dozen small applications and an agency hosting many low-traffic client sites on shared servers with certificates handled automatically are not what Timeplus is typically brought in for.
- What can Coolify do that Timeplus cannot?
- Coolify covers Git push deployments, One-click services, Automatic certificates, Managed databases. Timeplus covers Streaming SQL, Unified streaming and historical, ClickHouse-based engine, Single binary deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Coolify: Is anything held back for the paid tier?
No. Coolify Cloud hosts, updates and backs up the dashboard and gives it high availability. Every feature that touches your applications is in the Apache-2.0 build you can run yourself.
Timeplus: Is Timeplus open source?
The core engine, Timeplus Proton, is Apache 2.0. Timeplus Enterprise and Cloud are commercial.
Coolify: What does Coolify Cloud cost?
Five US dollars a month connects two servers, and each additional server is three dollars a month, with 20 per cent off for annual billing. You still supply and pay for the servers themselves.
Timeplus: What is the difference from Flink?
Timeplus is one binary with SQL as the only interface; Flink is a JVM cluster with a Java and SQL API and far more operational surface.
Coolify: Does it back up my application data?
It backs up PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB and MongoDB to S3 on a schedule. Application persistent volumes are not covered, so anything stored outside a managed database needs your own backup plan.
Timeplus: Can Proton run in production?
It can, but it is single-node only, so there is no high availability without the commercial edition.
Coolify: Can I run it across several servers?
Yes, but the documentation calls multi-server experimental. Load balancing is not configured for you, all nodes must share a CPU architecture, and you need to run your own Docker registry.
Timeplus: How much is the cloud?
From 199 US dollars a month, sized by CPU and memory, with a fourteen day trial.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Coolify vs Render
- Coolify vs Railway
- Coolify vs Heroku
- Coolify vs CapRover
- Coolify vs Dokku
- Coolify vs Fly.io
- Coolify vs Qovery
- Coolify vs Porter
- Coolify vs Zeabur
- Coolify vs Northflank
- Coolify vs SST
- Coolify vs Encore
- Coolify vs HAProxy
- Coolify vs IBM Cloud
- Coolify vs kind
- Coolify vs Koyeb
- Coolify vs Kustomize
- Coolify vs Linkerd
- Coolify vs Apache Flink
- Coolify vs ClickHouse
- Coolify vs Materialize
- Coolify vs Redpanda
- Coolify vs NATS
- Coolify vs DuckDB
- Coolify vs Estuary
- Coolify vs RisingWave
- Coolify vs Meilisearch
- Coolify vs Neo4j
- Coolify vs OpenSearch
- Coolify vs Qdrant
- Coolify vs SingleStore
- Coolify vs TiDB
- Coolify vs Tinybird
- Coolify vs Apache Kafka
- Coolify vs Apache Pulsar
- Coolify vs Apache Druid
- Timeplus vs Render
- Timeplus vs Railway
- Timeplus vs Heroku
- Timeplus vs CapRover
- Timeplus vs Dokku
- Timeplus vs Fly.io
- Timeplus vs Qovery
- Timeplus vs Porter
- Timeplus vs Zeabur
- Timeplus vs Northflank
- Timeplus vs SST
- Timeplus vs Encore
- Timeplus vs HAProxy
- Timeplus vs IBM Cloud
- Timeplus vs kind
- Timeplus vs Koyeb
- Timeplus vs Kustomize
- Timeplus vs Linkerd
- Timeplus vs Apache Flink
- Timeplus vs ClickHouse
- Timeplus vs Materialize
- Timeplus vs Redpanda
- Timeplus vs NATS
- Timeplus vs DuckDB
- Timeplus vs Estuary
- Timeplus vs RisingWave
- Timeplus vs Meilisearch
- Timeplus vs Neo4j
- Timeplus vs OpenSearch
- Timeplus vs Qdrant
- Timeplus vs SingleStore
- Timeplus vs TiDB
- Timeplus vs Tinybird
- Timeplus vs Apache Kafka
- Timeplus vs Apache Pulsar
- Timeplus vs Apache Druid
