Softwr

Restaurants · head to head

CookDocs vs Foodics

CookDocs logo

CookDocs

Restaurants

Kitchen documentation and training

From
$49/month
Rated
-
Foodics logo

Foodics

Restaurants

Cloud restaurant point of sale, payments and lending built for the Middle East and North Africa

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: CookDocs cookdocs.com redirects to modeeri.com; Foodics it is sold only in its supported Middle East and North Africa markets, so a group expanding into Europe or North America has to run a second point of sale platform there.
  • They diverge on capability: CookDocs covers Recipe documentation, Foodics covers Arabic and English interfaces.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which CookDocs and Foodics actually diverge.

Attributes where CookDocs and Foodics differ
AttributeCookDocsFoodics
Starting price$49/monthOn request
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
Founded2018Unknown

Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, Ios, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Restaurants).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in CookDocs

  • Recipe documentation
  • SOP management
  • Training guides
  • Visual instructions
  • Team sharing
  • Version control
  • Google Drive
  • Dropbox

Only in Foodics

  • Arabic and English interfaces
  • ZATCA electronic invoicing
  • Integrated payments
  • Inventory and cost control
  • Regional delivery integration
  • Merchant lending

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

CookDocs

  • Point of Salenot Foodics
  • Order Managementnot Foodics
  • Inventory Controlnot Foodics
  • Staff Schedulingnot Foodics

Foodics

  • A Saudi restaurant group that must satisfy ZATCA electronic invoicing without building it itselfnot CookDocs
  • A cafe chain in the Gulf needing Arabic interfaces for staff and Arabic receipts for customersnot CookDocs
  • An operator wanting local delivery platforms integrated rather than worked on separate tabletsnot CookDocs
  • A growing regional chain that wants POS, payments and working capital from one providernot CookDocs

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

CookDocs

  • cookdocs.com redirects to modeeri.com
  • No transparent pricing on public pages; demo booking required
  • Pricing structure not disclosed; contact sales required

Foodics

  • It is sold only in its supported Middle East and North Africa markets, so a group expanding into Europe or North America has to run a second point of sale platform there.
  • Revenue comes from payment processing rather than software, so a low subscription usually accompanies a processing rate that costs far more over a year than the licence does.
  • Merchant lending is underwritten against the card volume flowing through the platform, which makes switching vendors mid facility commercially awkward.
  • Feature depth is strongest in quick service and cafe formats; fine dining coursing, complex table management and hotel outlet workflows are thinner.
  • Support quality and reseller capability vary noticeably by country, so an implementation in a smaller market is not the same experience as one in Riyadh.

Pricing, plan by plan

CookDocs

$49/month
  • Basic$49/month
    • Documentation
    • Basic features
  • Pro$99/month
    • Training
    • Analytics

Foodics

On request
  • Foodics$undefined/year
    • Subscription quoted per branch with tiers by feature set
    • Terminals and payment hardware quoted with the agreement
    • Card processing rates negotiated separately and are the main vendor revenue

Which should you pick?

Choose CookDocs if

  • You need recipe documentation.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want sop management.

Choose Foodics if

  • You need arabic and english interfaces.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want zatca electronic invoicing.

Questions people ask

Is CookDocs or Foodics better?
Neither clearly leads. CookDocs starts at $49/month and Foodics at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, CookDocs or Foodics?
CookDocs starts at $49/month and Foodics at On request.
Does CookDocs or Foodics run on more platforms?
CookDocs runs on Web, Ios, Android. Foodics runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is CookDocs best used for?
CookDocs is most often used for point of sale, order management, inventory control, staff scheduling. Of those, point of sale and order management are not what Foodics is typically brought in for.
What can CookDocs do that Foodics cannot?
CookDocs covers Recipe documentation, SOP management, Training guides, Visual instructions. Foodics covers Arabic and English interfaces, ZATCA electronic invoicing, Integrated payments, Inventory and cost control.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

CookDocs: How much does Modeeri (cookdocs redirect) cost?

No specific pricing information is publicly available. Customers must book a demo or contact sales directly to learn costs.

Source
Foodics: Does it handle Saudi electronic invoicing?

Yes. ZATCA electronic invoicing requirements are supported in the platform, which is a principal reason Saudi operators choose it.

CookDocs: How long does implementation take?

Most businesses are fully onboarded within days to a few weeks depending on the number of locations and modules being implemented.

Source
Foodics: Can I use my own payment provider?

It is possible in some markets, but the commercial model is built around Foodics payments and the subscription pricing reflects that.

Foodics: Is it available outside the Middle East?

No. It is sold in Gulf markets and Egypt, and there is no general availability in Europe or North America.

Foodics: Does it work in Arabic throughout?

Yes, including right to left interfaces, Arabic receipts and Arabic reporting rather than a partial translation.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads