Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs Postman
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; Postman free plan limited to single user as of March 1, 2026, making it unsuitable for teams without paid plans
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Postman actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Postman does not also cover.
Only in Postman
- API client
- Automated testing
- Mock servers
- Documentation
- Monitors
- Workspaces
- Version control
- API design
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Postman
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Postman
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Postman
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Postman
Postman
- API testingnot Cody
- API documentationnot Cody
- API monitoringnot Cody
- Team collaborationnot Cody
- API developmentnot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Postman
- Free plan limited to single user as of March 1, 2026, making it unsuitable for teams without paid plans
- Only 25 collection runs per month and 1,000 API calls/month on free tier
- Removed local-only Scratch Pad mode in 2023, forcing cloud account creation and sync
- Requires Postman account and internet connection for most features
- Cloud-first architecture with mandatory syncing to Postman's cloud servers
- No CI/CD integration or advanced security features on free plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Postman
Free- FreeFree
- 1 user
- 25 collection runs/month
- 1,000 API calls/month
- Team$14/month
- Team collaboration
- Shared workspaces
- API mocking
- Professional$29/month
- Team features
- Advanced security
- SSO
- Enterprise$49/month
- Professional features
- Custom integrations
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Postman if
- You need api client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want automated testing.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Postman better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Postman at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Postman?
- Cody starts at Free and Postman at Free.
- Does Cody or Postman run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. Postman runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what Postman is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that Postman cannot?
- Postman covers API client, Automated testing, Mock servers, Documentation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourcePostman: What is the cost of Postman?
Postman has a free plan limited to 1 user, 25 collection runs/month, 1,000 API calls/month. Team plans start at $14/user/month for Basic. Professional at $29/user/month, and Enterprise at $49/user/month.
SourceCody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourcePostman: Can I use Postman offline?
Postman requires an internet connection to sync collections to the cloud. Since 2023, the Scratch Pad local-only mode was removed. Users must sign in with a Postman account, and collections sync to cloud by default. Offline work is possible but limited without cloud sync features.
SourceCody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourcePostman: Does Postman have team collaboration?
Team collaboration is not available on the free plan (limited to 1 user). Team plans start at $14/user/month and include shared workspaces, real-time collaboration, and team management features.
SourcePostman: What are the free plan limits?
Free plan allows: 1 user only, 25 collection runs per month, 1,000 API calls/month, and 1,000 mock server calls/month. No CI/CD integration or advanced security features.
SourcePostman: Does Postman work with other development tools?
Postman integrates with Git repositories, offers a Node.js runner (Newman) for automation, and connects with popular CI/CD platforms. Teams using git-native workflows may prefer alternatives like Bruno.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Steampipe
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Storybook
- Cody vs Lucidchart
- Cody vs GitHub
- Cody vs Notion
- Cody vs Dropbox
- Cody vs Whimsical
- Cody vs Asana
- Cody vs ClickUp
- Cody vs Figma
- Cody vs Auth0
- Cody vs Monday.com
- Cody vs Jira
- Cody vs Mixpanel
- Cody vs Terraform
- Cody vs Pendo
- Cody vs PostHog
- Cody vs Google Chrome
- Postman vs Turborepo
- Postman vs Visual Studio Code
- Postman vs ESLint
- Postman vs pnpm
- Postman vs Sourcegraph
- Postman vs Sweep
- Postman vs Deep Code
- Postman vs GitHub Copilot
- Postman vs Bazel
- Postman vs Fig
- Postman vs GoLand
- Postman vs Steampipe
- Postman vs Tilt
- Postman vs WarpBuild
- Postman vs Webpack
- Postman vs Avo
- Postman vs Azure DevOps
- Postman vs PhpStorm
- Postman vs Storybook
- Postman vs Lucidchart
- Postman vs GitHub
- Postman vs Notion
- Postman vs Dropbox
- Postman vs Whimsical
- Postman vs Asana
- Postman vs ClickUp
- Postman vs Figma
- Postman vs Auth0
- Postman vs Monday.com
- Postman vs Jira
- Postman vs Mixpanel
- Postman vs Terraform
- Postman vs Pendo
- Postman vs PostHog
- Postman vs Google Chrome


