Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs Mozilla Firefox

Mozilla Firefox
Technology
An independent web browser with its own rendering engine, funded almost entirely by search placement deals.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; Mozilla Firefox roughly 85 per cent of Mozilla's revenue comes from search default placement deals, overwhelmingly with Google, so the organisation that competes with Chrome depends on Chrome's owner for its funding and any renegotiation lands on Firefox's engineering budget within a quarter.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Mozilla Firefox actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cody | Mozilla Firefox |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Technology |
| Founded | 2013 | 2004 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Mozilla Firefox does not also cover.
Only in Mozilla Firefox
- Gecko engine
- Full webRequest blocking
- Total Cookie Protection
- Container tabs
- Extended Support Release
- policies.json and ADMX
- Built-in developer tools
- Firefox Sync
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Mozilla Firefox
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Mozilla Firefox
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Mozilla Firefox
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Mozilla Firefox
Mozilla Firefox
- Web development where you need to test against a non-Chromium engine before shipping, because Chromium-only testing hides real bugsnot Cody
- Users who require a full-strength content blocker, which Chrome's Manifest V3 no longer permitsnot Cody
- Managed fleets that need a browser on a slow release cadence with Group Policy control, using the ESR channelnot Cody
- Handling several accounts on the same service at once through container tabs, without separate profiles or private windowsnot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Mozilla Firefox
- Roughly 85 per cent of Mozilla's revenue comes from search default placement deals, overwhelmingly with Google, so the organisation that competes with Chrome depends on Chrome's owner for its funding and any renegotiation lands on Firefox's engineering budget within a quarter.
- Desktop market share sits at a few per cent, so commercial sites are tested against Chrome and Safari and a Firefox-only rendering or WebRTC bug is triaged as low priority by the site owner, leaving you with the workaround.
- On iOS and iPadOS the browser is a WebKit shell required by Apple's rules, so it delivers the interface and Sync but none of the engine, extension or tracking-protection behaviour that make Firefox worth choosing on desktop.
- Mozilla declines to implement several hardware-facing APIs on principle, including WebUSB, WebSerial, Web Bluetooth and WebHID, so a web application that talks to a device simply does not run and no configuration flag changes that.
- Enterprise management is limited to policies.json and ADMX templates; there is no first-party equivalent of Chrome Browser Cloud Management, so fleet-wide reporting on versions and extensions requires third-party tooling you have to buy or build.
- Mozilla repeatedly ships decisions its own user base objects to, such as enabling Privacy Preserving Attribution by default and the 2025 Terms of Use rewrite, and reversals arrive after the news cycle, so deploying it on a privacy argument means owning the communications work each time.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Mozilla Firefox
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Mozilla Firefox review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Mozilla Firefox if
- You need gecko engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want full webrequest blocking.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Mozilla Firefox better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Mozilla Firefox at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Mozilla Firefox?
- Cody starts at Free and Mozilla Firefox at Free.
- Does Cody or Mozilla Firefox run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. Mozilla Firefox runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what Mozilla Firefox is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that Mozilla Firefox cannot?
- Mozilla Firefox covers Gecko engine, Full webRequest blocking, Total Cookie Protection, Container tabs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceMozilla Firefox: Does uBlock Origin still work on Firefox?
Yes. Firefox has kept the blocking webRequest API that Chrome removed with Manifest V3, so uBlock Origin runs with its full rule set rather than the cut-down Lite version Chrome requires.
Cody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceMozilla Firefox: Is Firefox on iPhone the same browser?
No. Apple's platform rules require it to use WebKit, so on iOS and iPadOS you get Firefox's interface, Sync and bookmarks on top of Safari's engine. The privacy and extension behaviour are not the same.
Cody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceMozilla Firefox: How is Mozilla funded, and does that matter?
Mainly by payments for making a search engine the default, with Google as the dominant payer. It matters because it is a single-source dependency on a direct competitor, and it has been the subject of antitrust litigation whose outcome Mozilla does not control.
Mozilla Firefox: Can I manage it across a company fleet?
Yes, through policies.json or Windows Group Policy with the ADMX templates, and the ESR channel gives you a roughly yearly major version instead of four-weekly. There is no first-party cloud management console, so reporting needs other tooling.
Mozilla Firefox: Will every site work in it?
Most will. The exceptions cluster around sites tested only in Chrome, legacy enterprise applications, and anything using WebUSB, WebSerial, Web Bluetooth or WebHID, which Firefox does not implement at all.
Related pages
More on Mozilla Firefox
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Steampipe
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Google Chrome
- Cody vs Microsoft Edge
- Cody vs Safari
- Cody vs Jenkins
- Cody vs Plane
- Cody vs Vim
- Cody vs Kubernetes
- Cody vs PostHog
- Cody vs GitHub
- Cody vs Neovim
- Cody vs Eclipse
- Cody vs CloudAMQP
- Cody vs Dropbox
- Cody vs Lovable
- Cody vs Miro
- Cody vs Microsoft Outlook
- Mozilla Firefox vs Turborepo
- Mozilla Firefox vs Visual Studio Code
- Mozilla Firefox vs ESLint
- Mozilla Firefox vs pnpm
- Mozilla Firefox vs Sourcegraph
- Mozilla Firefox vs Sweep
- Mozilla Firefox vs Deep Code
- Mozilla Firefox vs GitHub Copilot
- Mozilla Firefox vs Bazel
- Mozilla Firefox vs Fig
- Mozilla Firefox vs GoLand
- Mozilla Firefox vs Steampipe
- Mozilla Firefox vs Tilt
- Mozilla Firefox vs WarpBuild
- Mozilla Firefox vs Webpack
- Mozilla Firefox vs Avo
- Mozilla Firefox vs Azure DevOps
- Mozilla Firefox vs PhpStorm
- Mozilla Firefox vs Google Chrome
- Mozilla Firefox vs Microsoft Edge
- Mozilla Firefox vs Safari
- Mozilla Firefox vs Jenkins
- Mozilla Firefox vs Plane
- Mozilla Firefox vs Vim
- Mozilla Firefox vs Kubernetes
- Mozilla Firefox vs PostHog
- Mozilla Firefox vs GitHub
- Mozilla Firefox vs Neovim
- Mozilla Firefox vs Eclipse
- Mozilla Firefox vs CloudAMQP
- Mozilla Firefox vs Dropbox
- Mozilla Firefox vs Lovable
- Mozilla Firefox vs Miro
- Mozilla Firefox vs Microsoft Outlook

