Databases · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs Fabi

Fabi
Business Intelligence
AI notebooks combining SQL, Python and no-code for small data teams
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); Fabi fabi is an early-stage company with a small team, so the durability risk is real and there is no obvious migration path for Smartbooks if it stops trading.
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Fabi covers Smartbooks.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and Fabi actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | Fabi |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Per user per month |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Web |
| Category | Databases | Business Intelligence |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in Fabi
- Smartbooks
- Smart Reports
- AI analysis
- Scheduled runs
- Database connectors
- Viewer seats
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot Fabi
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot Fabi
Fabi
- A single analyst at a startup fielding ad hoc questions faster than dashboards can be built for themnot Cockroach Labs
- An operations team that needs Python for a one-off analysis but has to hand the result to non-technical colleaguesnot Cockroach Labs
- Replacing a set of scheduled Jupyter notebooks that nobody outside the data team can read or rerunnot Cockroach Labs
- Exploratory work against a warehouse where building a semantic model first would cost more than the answer is worthnot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
Fabi
- Fabi is an early-stage company with a small team, so the durability risk is real and there is no obvious migration path for Smartbooks if it stops trading.
- There is no meaningful governance layer: no data catalogue, no certified metric definitions and limited lineage, so it does not scale to an organisation that needs a single agreed number.
- The free and Builder tiers cap AI requests, and the daily cap on Starter is reached quickly during genuine exploratory work.
- Connector counts are limited by tier, so the Builder plan at 39 dollars connects to exactly one data source, which is rarely enough in practice.
- It overlaps heavily with what Snowflake, Databricks and Hex now ship natively, so a company already paying for one of those is buying a fourth notebook interface.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
Fabi
Free- StarterFree
- One builder seat
- Ten dashboard viewers
- Five Smartbooks
- Builder$39/month
- Twenty-five Smart Report viewers
- Ten Smartbooks with workflows
- One data connector
- Team$199/month
- Four builder seats, extra seats at 39 USD
- Fifty viewers
- Premium connector
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited builder seats
- Full connector access
- Custom security review
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose Fabi if
- You need smartbooks.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want smart reports.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or Fabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Fabi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or Fabi?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Fabi at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or Fabi run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. Fabi runs on Web.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what Fabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that Fabi cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. Fabi covers Smartbooks, Smart Reports, AI analysis, Scheduled runs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cockroach Labs: What does the free Basic tier include?
The Basic tier is free and includes 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month, with a maximum compute of 30K RU/sec. No credit card is required to start.
SourceFabi: Is there a free plan?
Yes, a Starter tier with one builder, ten viewers, five Smartbooks and ten AI requests a day.
Cockroach Labs: How much do the paid tiers cost?
Standard tier starts at $0.18 per hour for 2 vCPUs, and Advanced tier starts at $0.60 per hour for 4 vCPUs. Both tiers support additional resources with higher costs for increased compute and storage.
SourceFabi: Do viewers cost money?
Viewers are bundled by tier rather than charged individually; builders are the priced seat.
Cockroach Labs: What are the storage limits for each tier?
Basic plan supports up to 3 TiB storage, Standard tier up to 3 TiB, and Advanced tier up to 10 TiB per node with unlimited total storage.
SourceFabi: Can I run arbitrary Python?
Yes, Smartbooks include Python cells alongside SQL and no-code steps.
Cockroach Labs: Can I get trial credits before paying?
Yes, new users can try CockroachDB free with $400 in credits. The Basic and Standard plans do not require a credit card to start.
SourceFabi: How many data connectors does the entry paid plan include?
One. Additional and premium connectors come with the Team tier.
Cockroach Labs: Do legacy contracts have different pricing?
Customers with annual or multi-year contracts entered before December 1, 2024 can view legacy pricing terms on a separate page, which apply until their contract renewal date.
SourceRelated pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs YugabyteDB
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs Google Cloud SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs TiDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Dgraph
- Cockroach Labs vs CosmosDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DataStax
- Cockroach Labs vs Neo4j
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Materialize
- Cockroach Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Turso
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Hex
- Cockroach Labs vs Deepnote
- Cockroach Labs vs Mode
- Cockroach Labs vs Periscope Data
- Cockroach Labs vs Zenlytic
- Cockroach Labs vs Evidence
- Cockroach Labs vs Cube
- Cockroach Labs vs Databox
- Cockroach Labs vs Reportz
- Cockroach Labs vs Anaplan
- Cockroach Labs vs Grow
- Cockroach Labs vs Luzmo
- Cockroach Labs vs NetBase Quid
- Cockroach Labs vs Phocas
- Cockroach Labs vs Preset
- Cockroach Labs vs ProfitWell
- Cockroach Labs vs Quantum Metric
- Cockroach Labs vs Quid
- Fabi vs YugabyteDB
- Fabi vs PostgreSQL
- Fabi vs Couchbase
- Fabi vs Google Cloud SQL
- Fabi vs Amazon Aurora
- Fabi vs Elasticsearch
- Fabi vs Oracle Database
- Fabi vs TiDB
- Fabi vs Dgraph
- Fabi vs CosmosDB
- Fabi vs DataStax
- Fabi vs Neo4j
- Fabi vs MariaDB
- Fabi vs Materialize
- Fabi vs TimescaleDB
- Fabi vs Turso
- Fabi vs Amazon RDS
- Fabi vs Hex
- Fabi vs Deepnote
- Fabi vs Mode
- Fabi vs Periscope Data
- Fabi vs Zenlytic
- Fabi vs Evidence
- Fabi vs Cube
- Fabi vs Databox
- Fabi vs Reportz
- Fabi vs Anaplan
- Fabi vs Grow
- Fabi vs Luzmo
- Fabi vs NetBase Quid
- Fabi vs Phocas
- Fabi vs Preset
- Fabi vs ProfitWell
- Fabi vs Quantum Metric
- Fabi vs Quid

