File Storage · head to head
Cloudian vs Rook

Cloudian
File Storage
S3-compatible on-premises object storage with object lock immutability
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Rook
Cloud
Kubernetes operator that deploys and manages Ceph storage clusters
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Rook has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cloudian you operate the hardware, so capacity planning, firmware, node failures and a refresh cycle every five years return as costs that a public cloud bill hides.; Rook rook automates Ceph but does not abstract it, so an incident still demands Ceph expertise, and organisations without it end up hiring consultants at exactly the wrong moment.
- They diverge on capability: Cloudian covers S3 API compatibility, Rook covers Ceph operator.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cloudian and Rook actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cloudian
- S3 API compatibility
- Object Lock
- Multi-tenancy
- Hybrid tiering
- HyperStore appliances
Only in Rook
- Ceph operator
- Block, file and object
- CSI driver
- Automated upgrades
- Multi-cluster mirroring
Both cover
- Erasure coding
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cloudian
- A backup team needing an immutable target so a compromised administrator account cannot delete the backupsnot Rook
- An organisation restoring hundreds of terabytes regularly where public cloud egress charges make cloud storage untenablenot Rook
- A university or government body with data residency rules preventing use of public cloud object storagenot Rook
- A media archive holding petabytes of finished content where per-terabyte capital cost beats per-gigabyte monthly cloud feesnot Rook
Rook
- An on-premises Kubernetes platform needing block, shared filesystem and S3 storage without buying three productsnot Cloudian
- A team that already runs Ceph and wants its lifecycle managed declaratively inside Kubernetesnot Cloudian
- A large cluster where three-way replication overhead is unaffordable and erasure coding is requirednot Cloudian
- An organisation building a private cloud that cannot use managed cloud storage services for residency reasonsnot Cloudian
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cloudian
- You operate the hardware, so capacity planning, firmware, node failures and a refresh cycle every five years return as costs that a public cloud bill hides.
- Per-terabyte licensing plus servers means high upfront cost, and the crossover point against public cloud only arrives at meaningful scale, typically hundreds of terabytes and up.
- S3 compatibility is high but not identical to Amazon, so occasional applications depending on newer or less common S3 features need testing rather than assumption.
- Small deployments need a minimum node count for erasure coding to be meaningful, which sets a practical floor on entry cost regardless of how little data you have.
- Performance is object storage performance, so it is not a substitute for block or high-throughput file storage and buyers occasionally deploy it for the wrong workload.
Rook
- Rook automates Ceph but does not abstract it, so an incident still demands Ceph expertise, and organisations without it end up hiring consultants at exactly the wrong moment.
- There is no vendor and no SLA; the realistic commercial support routes are IBM Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation or an independent Ceph consultancy, both of which change the cost picture entirely.
- Ceph is resource hungry, needing substantial memory and dedicated disks per OSD, so the hardware cost of a properly sized cluster is often underestimated.
- Recovery and rebalancing after a disk or node failure generates heavy background input and output that can degrade application performance for hours, which surprises teams sizing for steady state.
- Minimum viable clusters require several nodes with several disks each, so it is impractical at small scale and the entry hardware cost exceeds simpler alternatives.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cloudian
On request- Cloudian HyperStore$undefined/year
- Licensed per usable terabyte, subscription or perpetual
- Software-only on your hardware or as Cloudian appliances
- No egress or API request charges
Rook
Free- RookFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed, no licence fee
- Graduated CNCF project
- Community support via GitHub and Slack only
Which should you pick?
Choose Cloudian if
- You need s3 api compatibility.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want object lock.
Choose Rook if
- You need ceph operator.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes.
- You also want block, file and object.
Questions people ask
- Is Cloudian or Rook better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cloudian starts at On request and Rook at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cloudian or Rook?
- Rook has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Cloudian and Free for Rook.
- Does Cloudian or Rook run on more platforms?
- Cloudian runs on Linux. Rook runs on Linux, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Rook for free?
- Yes. Rook has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cloudian starts at On request.
- What is Cloudian best used for?
- Cloudian is most often used for a backup team needing an immutable target so a compromised administrator account cannot delete the backups, an organisation restoring hundreds of terabytes regularly where public cloud egress charges make cloud storage untenable, a university or government body with data residency rules preventing use of public cloud object storage, a media archive holding petabytes of finished content where per-terabyte capital cost beats per-gigabyte monthly cloud fees. Of those, a backup team needing an immutable target so a compromised administrator account cannot delete the backups and an organisation restoring hundreds of terabytes regularly where public cloud egress charges make cloud storage untenable are not what Rook is typically brought in for.
- What can Cloudian do that Rook cannot?
- Cloudian covers S3 API compatibility, Object Lock, Multi-tenancy, Hybrid tiering. Rook covers Ceph operator, Block, file and object, CSI driver, Automated upgrades. Both handle Erasure coding.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cloudian: Does object lock really stop ransomware deleting backups?
Within the retention period, yes, provided the lock is set in compliance mode. That is precisely why it is the common answer to backup-targeting ransomware.
Rook: Who supports it in production?
Nobody by default. IBM sells Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation, which is supported Rook and Ceph, and independent consultancies sell Ceph support. Decide this before deployment.
Cloudian: Are there egress charges?
No. That is the central cost argument against public cloud object storage, and it only becomes visible when you have to restore at volume.
Rook: Does it need Ceph knowledge?
Yes. Rook handles deployment and routine operations, but troubleshooting a degraded cluster is a Ceph skill and there is no way around it.
Cloudian: Can we use our own servers?
Yes, HyperStore is software-defined and runs on qualified commodity hardware, or you can buy Cloudian appliances if you would rather not certify your own.
Rook: Can it replace an object storage appliance?
Functionally yes, through the RADOS gateway, but you take on the operations that an appliance vendor would otherwise carry.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cloudian vs MinIO
- Cloudian vs Backblaze
- Cloudian vs IDrive e2
- Cloudian vs Scality RING
- Cloudian vs Storj
- Cloudian vs Cloudflare R2
- Cloudian vs Panzura
- Cloudian vs Tigris
- Cloudian vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Cloudian vs Barracuda Backup
- Cloudian vs Ceph
- Cloudian vs Arq Backup
- Cloudian vs Sync.com
- Cloudian vs Tresorit
- Cloudian vs VAST Data
- Cloudian vs OpenEBS
- Cloudian vs Qovery
- Cloudian vs Coolify
- Cloudian vs Portworx
- Cloudian vs Vultr
- Cloudian vs Dokku
- Cloudian vs Scaleway
- Cloudian vs SST
- Cloudian vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Cloudian vs Neon
- Cloudian vs Wasabi
- Cloudian vs Podman
- Cloudian vs Azure Functions
- Cloudian vs Deno Deploy
- Cloudian vs Hetzner Cloud
- Cloudian vs Infracost
- Cloudian vs Lambda
- Cloudian vs Linode
- Rook vs MinIO
- Rook vs Backblaze
- Rook vs IDrive e2
- Rook vs Scality RING
- Rook vs Storj
- Rook vs Cloudflare R2
- Rook vs Panzura
- Rook vs Tigris
- Rook vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Rook vs Barracuda Backup
- Rook vs Ceph
- Rook vs Arq Backup
- Rook vs Sync.com
- Rook vs Tresorit
- Rook vs VAST Data
- Rook vs OpenEBS
- Rook vs Qovery
- Rook vs Coolify
- Rook vs Portworx
- Rook vs Vultr
- Rook vs Dokku
- Rook vs Scaleway
- Rook vs SST
- Rook vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Rook vs Neon
- Rook vs Wasabi
- Rook vs Podman
- Rook vs Azure Functions
- Rook vs Deno Deploy
- Rook vs Hetzner Cloud
- Rook vs Infracost
- Rook vs Lambda
- Rook vs Linode
