File Storage · head to head
Cloudian vs Scality RING

Cloudian
File Storage
S3-compatible on-premises object storage with object lock immutability
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Scality RING
File Storage
Petabyte-scale object storage software on your own hardware
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cloudian you operate the hardware, so capacity planning, firmware, node failures and a refresh cycle every five years return as costs that a public cloud bill hides.; Scality RING hardware is bought separately, so the software quote understates total cost and the buyer carries the sizing risk if the drive and server specification is wrong.
- They diverge on capability: Cloudian covers S3 API compatibility, Scality RING covers S3-compatible object storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cloudian and Scality RING actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cloudian | Scality RING |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Linux), user rating (Not yet rated), category (File Storage).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cloudian
- S3 API compatibility
- Object Lock
- Multi-tenancy
- Hybrid tiering
- HyperStore appliances
Only in Scality RING
- S3-compatible object storage
- File and object access
- Object lock
- Multi-site geodistribution
- Hardware independence
- ARTESCA
Both cover
- Erasure coding
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cloudian
- A backup team needing an immutable target so a compromised administrator account cannot delete the backupsnot Scality RING
- An organisation restoring hundreds of terabytes regularly where public cloud egress charges make cloud storage untenablenot Scality RING
- A university or government body with data residency rules preventing use of public cloud object storagenot Scality RING
- A media archive holding petabytes of finished content where per-terabyte capital cost beats per-gigabyte monthly cloud feesnot Scality RING
Scality RING
- A broadcaster archiving decades of video where hyperscaler storage and egress costs would be prohibitivenot Cloudian
- A hospital group holding medical imaging on premises for data residency and retention reasonsnot Cloudian
- An enterprise building an immutable on premises backup target for Veeam or Commvault with object locknot Cloudian
- A service provider offering S3-compatible storage to its own customers on hardware it controlsnot Cloudian
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cloudian
- You operate the hardware, so capacity planning, firmware, node failures and a refresh cycle every five years return as costs that a public cloud bill hides.
- Per-terabyte licensing plus servers means high upfront cost, and the crossover point against public cloud only arrives at meaningful scale, typically hundreds of terabytes and up.
- S3 compatibility is high but not identical to Amazon, so occasional applications depending on newer or less common S3 features need testing rather than assumption.
- Small deployments need a minimum node count for erasure coding to be meaningful, which sets a practical floor on entry cost regardless of how little data you have.
- Performance is object storage performance, so it is not a substitute for block or high-throughput file storage and buyers occasionally deploy it for the wrong workload.
Scality RING
- Hardware is bought separately, so the software quote understates total cost and the buyer carries the sizing risk if the drive and server specification is wrong.
- Running distributed erasure coded storage requires operations skills, and organisations that expected appliance simplicity end up staffing a storage team they had not budgeted.
- Rebuild times after a drive failure on large capacity disks are measured in hours or days, and capacity planning has to leave headroom for that degraded window.
- Pricing is per usable terabyte and quoted, so cost comparisons against cloud object storage require modelling your own retrieval patterns rather than reading a rate card.
- Small deployments carry a minimum viable node count for erasure coding to work sensibly, which makes the entry footprint larger and less economic than the per-terabyte price implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cloudian
On request- Cloudian HyperStore$undefined/year
- Licensed per usable terabyte, subscription or perpetual
- Software-only on your hardware or as Cloudian appliances
- No egress or API request charges
Scality RING
On request- Scality RING$undefined/year
- Priced per usable terabyte, subscription or perpetual
- Server hardware purchased separately by the customer
- Support tiers quoted separately
- Scality ARTESCA$undefined/year
- Lighter object store for smaller footprints
- Priced per usable terabyte
- Commonly deployed as an immutable backup target
Which should you pick?
Choose Cloudian if
- You need s3 api compatibility.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want object lock.
Choose Scality RING if
- You need s3-compatible object storage.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want file and object access.
Questions people ask
- Is Cloudian or Scality RING better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cloudian starts at On request and Scality RING at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cloudian or Scality RING?
- Cloudian starts at On request and Scality RING at On request.
- Does Cloudian or Scality RING run on more platforms?
- Both run on Linux, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Cloudian best used for?
- Cloudian is most often used for a backup team needing an immutable target so a compromised administrator account cannot delete the backups, an organisation restoring hundreds of terabytes regularly where public cloud egress charges make cloud storage untenable, a university or government body with data residency rules preventing use of public cloud object storage, a media archive holding petabytes of finished content where per-terabyte capital cost beats per-gigabyte monthly cloud fees. Of those, a backup team needing an immutable target so a compromised administrator account cannot delete the backups and an organisation restoring hundreds of terabytes regularly where public cloud egress charges make cloud storage untenable are not what Scality RING is typically brought in for.
- What can Cloudian do that Scality RING cannot?
- Cloudian covers S3 API compatibility, Object Lock, Multi-tenancy, Hybrid tiering. Scality RING covers S3-compatible object storage, File and object access, Object lock, Multi-site geodistribution. Both handle Erasure coding.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cloudian: Does object lock really stop ransomware deleting backups?
Within the retention period, yes, provided the lock is set in compliance mode. That is precisely why it is the common answer to backup-targeting ransomware.
Scality RING: Do we buy hardware from Scality?
No. RING is software; you buy commodity servers and drives yourself, which is the point for buyers who want to rebid hardware at each refresh.
Cloudian: Are there egress charges?
No. That is the central cost argument against public cloud object storage, and it only becomes visible when you have to restore at volume.
Scality RING: Is it S3-compatible enough for backup software?
Yes, it is a common object lock target for Veeam, Commvault and Rubrik. Verify the specific S3 features your backup product needs during a proof of concept.
Cloudian: Can we use our own servers?
Yes, HyperStore is software-defined and runs on qualified commodity hardware, or you can buy Cloudian appliances if you would rather not certify your own.
Scality RING: What is ARTESCA?
A lighter object store from the same company, aimed at smaller footprints and backup targets rather than multi-petabyte archives.
Related pages
More on Scality RING
Other head to heads
- Cloudian vs MinIO
- Cloudian vs Backblaze
- Cloudian vs IDrive e2
- Cloudian vs Storj
- Cloudian vs Cloudflare R2
- Cloudian vs Panzura
- Cloudian vs Tigris
- Cloudian vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Cloudian vs Barracuda Backup
- Cloudian vs Ceph
- Cloudian vs Arq Backup
- Cloudian vs Sync.com
- Cloudian vs Tresorit
- Cloudian vs VAST Data
- Cloudian vs Nasuni
- Cloudian vs CrashPlan
- Cloudian vs TrueNAS
- Cloudian vs Google Drive
- Cloudian vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Cloudian vs Nextcloud
- Cloudian vs Zerto
- Cloudian vs IDrive
- Scality RING vs MinIO
- Scality RING vs Backblaze
- Scality RING vs IDrive e2
- Scality RING vs Storj
- Scality RING vs Cloudflare R2
- Scality RING vs Panzura
- Scality RING vs Tigris
- Scality RING vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Scality RING vs Barracuda Backup
- Scality RING vs Ceph
- Scality RING vs Arq Backup
- Scality RING vs Sync.com
- Scality RING vs Tresorit
- Scality RING vs VAST Data
- Scality RING vs Nasuni
- Scality RING vs CrashPlan
- Scality RING vs TrueNAS
- Scality RING vs Google Drive
- Scality RING vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Scality RING vs Nextcloud
- Scality RING vs Zerto
- Scality RING vs IDrive
