Cloud · head to head
CloudAMQP vs Deno Deploy

CloudAMQP
Cloud
Managed RabbitMQ and LavinMQ clusters, hosted and fully managed
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- CloudAMQP is a managed RabbitMQ hosting service billed per second; Deno Deploy is a distributed system.
- Free plans on both; paid from $19/mo and $20/mo.
- Where CloudAMQP falls short: free tier messaging limits are low: 1-2M messages/month.
- Where Deno Deploy falls short: smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CloudAMQP and Deno Deploy actually diverge.
On every field we record, CloudAMQP and Deno Deploy match. The differences are in what each one covers, below.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), category (Cloud).
Not yet recorded: pricing model for Deno Deploy, founded for CloudAMQP.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CloudAMQP
Nothing recorded that Deno Deploy does not also cover.
Only in Deno Deploy
- Edge Functions
- Deno KV
- Automatic HTTPS
- Global Distribution
- Zero Config Deploy
- Git Integration
- Instant Rollbacks
- Web Standard APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CloudAMQP
- Message queue servicesnot Deno Deploy
- Message brokers for distributed systemsnot Deno Deploy
- RabbitMQ and LavinMQ hostingnot Deno Deploy
- Asynchronous task processingnot Deno Deploy
Deno Deploy
- API endpointsnot CloudAMQP
- Edge functionsnot CloudAMQP
- Static sitesnot CloudAMQP
- Real-time appsnot CloudAMQP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CloudAMQP
- Free tier messaging limits are low: 1-2M messages/month
- Free tier connection limits are restrictive: 20-40
- Multi-tenant plans have queue limits (200-2,000 max)
- Dedicated plans expensive at scale: up to $14,995-$17,495/month
- Extra disk space add-on at $0.35/month per GB may add significant cost
Deno Deploy
- Smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations
- Less mature than established serverless platforms; newer company and platform
- 1GB deployment size limit may restrict larger applications
- 512MB memory limit lower than some competitors for memory-intensive workloads
- Smaller user base and community compared to Lambda or Netlify
Pricing, plan by plan
CloudAMQP
Free- LavinMQ - Loyal Lemming (Free)Free
- 2 million messages per month
- 40 connection limit
- 200 queue maximum
- RabbitMQ - Little Lemur (Free)Free
- 1 million messages per month
- 20 connection limit
- 100 queue maximum
- LavinMQ - Elegant Ermine$19/mo
- 20 million messages per month
- 200 connections
- 2,000 queue maximum
- RabbitMQ - Tough Tiger$19/mo
- 10 million messages per month
- 100 connections
- 1,000 queue maximum
Deno Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 1M requests/month
- 100GB outbound bandwidth
- 50ms CPU time per request
- Pro$20/mo
- Unlimited requests
- 5GB KV storage
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Deno Deploy if
- You need edge functions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want deno kv.
Questions people ask
- Is CloudAMQP or Deno Deploy better?
- Neither clearly leads. CloudAMQP starts at Free and Deno Deploy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CloudAMQP or Deno Deploy?
- CloudAMQP starts at Free and Deno Deploy at Free.
- Does CloudAMQP or Deno Deploy run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use CloudAMQP for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CloudAMQP best used for?
- CloudAMQP is most often used for message queue services, message brokers for distributed systems, rabbitmq and lavinmq hosting, asynchronous task processing. Of those, message queue services and message brokers for distributed systems are not what Deno Deploy is typically brought in for.
- What can CloudAMQP do that Deno Deploy cannot?
- Deno Deploy covers Edge Functions, Deno KV, Automatic HTTPS, Global Distribution.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CloudAMQP: Does CloudAMQP offer free plans?
Yes, CloudAMQP offers free tiers: LavinMQ Loyal Lemming with 2M messages/month, and RabbitMQ Little Lemur with 1M messages/month. Both include connection and queue limits.
SourceDeno Deploy: What does Deno Deploy's free tier include?
Deno Deploy free tier includes 1 million requests per month, 100 GB of outbound bandwidth, 50 milliseconds of CPU time per request, 50 custom domains, 1 GiB of KV storage, and up to 5 team members.
SourceCloudAMQP: What is the cheapest paid plan?
Both LavinMQ Elegant Ermine and RabbitMQ Tough Tiger cost $19/month. LavinMQ includes 20M messages/month with 200 connections; RabbitMQ includes 10M messages/month with 100 connections.
SourceDeno Deploy: What are Deno Deploy's Pro plan features and pricing?
Deno Deploy Pro costs $20/month and removes request limits, increases KV storage to 5GB, and includes priority support. Additional storage beyond 5GB costs $0.75/GiB.
SourceCloudAMQP: How are messages charged on CloudAMQP?
CloudAMQP plans include monthly message quotas. All plans are charged on a per-second basis with monthly billing cycles.
SourceDeno Deploy: What are the deployment size and memory limits for Deno Deploy?
The total size of all files within a deployment (source files and static files) should not exceed 1 gigabyte. Applications have a maximum memory allocation of 512MB.
SourceCloudAMQP: What add-ons are available?
CloudAMQP offers Virtual Private Cloud add-on at $99/month, and extra disk space at $0.35/month per GB (25-2,000 GB available).
SourceDeno Deploy: Does Deno Deploy support TypeScript natively?
Yes. Deno Deploy runs TypeScript natively with zero-configuration TypeScript support. Code can be written in TypeScript or JavaScript and runs on the same V8 engine.
SourceDeno Deploy: What security features does Deno Deploy provide?
Deno Deploy features an opt-in permission system to mitigate supply chain attacks. Permissions can be explicitly granted for file, network, and environment access, running code securely by default.
SourceRelated pages
More on Deno Deploy
Other head to heads
- CloudAMQP vs Confluent Cloud
- CloudAMQP vs Neon
- CloudAMQP vs Grafana Cloud
- CloudAMQP vs DigitalOcean
- CloudAMQP vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- CloudAMQP vs Anyscale
- CloudAMQP vs DeepInfra
- CloudAMQP vs Beam Cloud
- CloudAMQP vs Cerebrium
- CloudAMQP vs K3s
- CloudAMQP vs Infracost
- CloudAMQP vs Go
- CloudAMQP vs Hetzner Cloud
- CloudAMQP vs Jaeger
- CloudAMQP vs Lambda
- CloudAMQP vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- CloudAMQP vs Rancher
- CloudAMQP vs Upstash
- CloudAMQP vs Serverless Framework
- CloudAMQP vs Koyeb
- CloudAMQP vs Pulumi
- CloudAMQP vs Render
- CloudAMQP vs Fly.io
- CloudAMQP vs Fireworks AI
- CloudAMQP vs Fastly
- CloudAMQP vs Linode
- CloudAMQP vs Longhorn
- CloudAMQP vs minikube
- Deno Deploy vs Confluent Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Neon
- Deno Deploy vs Grafana Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs DigitalOcean
- Deno Deploy vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Deno Deploy vs Anyscale
- Deno Deploy vs DeepInfra
- Deno Deploy vs Beam Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Cerebrium
- Deno Deploy vs K3s
- Deno Deploy vs Infracost
- Deno Deploy vs Go
- Deno Deploy vs Hetzner Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Jaeger
- Deno Deploy vs Lambda
- Deno Deploy vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Deno Deploy vs Rancher
- Deno Deploy vs Upstash
- Deno Deploy vs Serverless Framework
- Deno Deploy vs Koyeb
- Deno Deploy vs Pulumi
- Deno Deploy vs Render
- Deno Deploy vs Fly.io
- Deno Deploy vs Fireworks AI
- Deno Deploy vs Fastly
- Deno Deploy vs Linode
- Deno Deploy vs Longhorn
- Deno Deploy vs minikube

