Government · head to head
CKAN vs Lonboard

Lonboard
Maps
Python map rendering in Jupyter that skips GeoJSON and moves millions of features without choking
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CKAN the package install path requires Ubuntu 20.04 or 22.04 64-bit specifically; other operating systems must use the source install; Lonboard it is a notebook visualisation library, not a mapping application, so there is no editing, no layout, no map export for print and no sharing beyond distributing the notebook or an HTML file
- They diverge on capability: CKAN covers Dataset Management, Lonboard covers GeoArrow binary transfer.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CKAN and Lonboard actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CKAN
- Dataset Management
- Data Harvesting
- API Access
- Visualization
- Extensions
- DataPusher
- Harvester
- Third-party Tools
Only in Lonboard
- GeoArrow binary transfer
- GeoPandas input
- deck.gl layers
- Jupyter widget
- Large dataset handling
- Styling by attribute
- Open source licence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CKAN
- Publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portalnot Lonboard
- Self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an APInot Lonboard
Lonboard
- An analyst exploring a national road or parcel dataset in a notebook where pydeck or ipyleaflet becomes unusable at that sizenot CKAN
- A researcher publishing a reproducible analysis where the visualisation must run from the same script as the processingnot CKAN
- A data scientist joining spatial data to model outputs in pandas and needing to see the result immediately without exporting to a GISnot CKAN
- A team building an internal analysis pipeline on GeoParquet that wants rendering without a serialisation step in the middlenot CKAN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CKAN
- The package install path requires Ubuntu 20.04 or 22.04 64-bit specifically; other operating systems must use the source install
- Only Solr 9 and Solr 8 are supported, and from CKAN 2.10 they are the only Solr versions supported at all
- A working deployment requires PostgreSQL, Solr, Redis, nginx, supervisor and uWSGI to be installed and maintained separately
- Python 3.10 or later is required
Lonboard
- It is a notebook visualisation library, not a mapping application, so there is no editing, no layout, no map export for print and no sharing beyond distributing the notebook or an HTML file
- Maintenance sits with Development Seed as an open source side output of a consultancy, so roadmap priorities follow client projects and there is no support contract to buy
- Layer coverage is a subset of deck.gl, so an analyst needing a less common layer type has to drop to pydeck or write JavaScript rather than staying in Python
- It expects data already in GeoPandas or Arrow form, which means the performance benefit depends on the rest of your pipeline being Arrow-friendly; reading a large Shapefile is still the slow step
- Rendering happens in the browser, so very large datasets are ultimately limited by the client machine's memory and GPU rather than by the server, and a laptop will still fail on data a workstation handles
Pricing, plan by plan
CKAN
Free- Open SourceFree
- Data Management
- API Access
- Visualization
Lonboard
Free- LonboardFree
- Open source, no licence fee
- No usage limits
- Installed from PyPI or conda
Which should you pick?
Choose CKAN if
- You need dataset management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want data harvesting.
Choose Lonboard if
- You need geoarrow binary transfer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want geopandas input.
Questions people ask
- Is CKAN or Lonboard better?
- Neither clearly leads. CKAN starts at Free and Lonboard at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CKAN or Lonboard?
- CKAN starts at Free and Lonboard at Free.
- Does CKAN or Lonboard run on more platforms?
- CKAN runs on Web. Lonboard runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use CKAN for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CKAN best used for?
- CKAN is most often used for publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portal, self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an api. Of those, publishing open government datasets in a searchable public data portal and self-hosting a data catalogue with harvesting and an api are not what Lonboard is typically brought in for.
- What can CKAN do that Lonboard cannot?
- CKAN covers Dataset Management, Data Harvesting, API Access, Visualization. Lonboard covers GeoArrow binary transfer, GeoPandas input, deck.gl layers, Jupyter widget.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CKAN: Is CKAN open-source and what license is it available under?
Yes, CKAN is an open-source data management system built on Python and available on GitHub. The license terms are available on their GitHub repository.
SourceLonboard: Why not just use pydeck?
pydeck serialises geometry to GeoJSON to reach the browser. Lonboard uses a binary GeoArrow pipeline, which is the reason it handles far larger datasets in the same notebook.
CKAN: Does CKAN offer commercial support for organizations?
Yes, CKAN offers commercial support through certified providers including Link Digital and Datopian. Support includes advisory services, application development, integration, managed hosting, and web development.
SourceLonboard: Who maintains it?
Development Seed, a geospatial engineering consultancy, as an open source project. There is no commercial support offering.
CKAN: Who is responsible for hosting costs when running CKAN?
Organizations deploying CKAN are responsible for their own hosting infrastructure. Commercial providers like Datopian and Link Digital offer managed hosting services if organizations prefer not to self-host.
SourceLonboard: Does it work outside Jupyter?
It is built as a Jupyter widget. Exporting to standalone HTML is possible, but the intended environment is a notebook.
Lonboard: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes, it is open source with no licence fee.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CKAN vs Granicus
- CKAN vs DocuWare
- CKAN vs Accela
- CKAN vs CivicPlus
- CKAN vs Socrata
- CKAN vs DataSF
- CKAN vs mySidewalk
- CKAN vs Laserfiche
- CKAN vs IAPro
- CKAN vs Bidnet Direct
- CKAN vs eCode360
- CKAN vs Axon Records
- CKAN vs CitizenLab
- CKAN vs ClearGov
- CKAN vs DemandStar
- CKAN vs MyRec.com
- CKAN vs Legistar
- CKAN vs deck.gl
- CKAN vs QGIS
- CKAN vs CARTO
- CKAN vs Fused
- CKAN vs Potree
- CKAN vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- CKAN vs SAGA GIS
- CKAN vs GRASS GIS
- CKAN vs WhiteboxTools
- CKAN vs Kepler.gl
- CKAN vs Agisoft Metashape
- CKAN vs Leaflet
- CKAN vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- CKAN vs TomTom
- CKAN vs Transit
- CKAN vs Waze
- CKAN vs What3words
- CKAN vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Lonboard vs Granicus
- Lonboard vs DocuWare
- Lonboard vs Accela
- Lonboard vs CivicPlus
- Lonboard vs Socrata
- Lonboard vs DataSF
- Lonboard vs mySidewalk
- Lonboard vs Laserfiche
- Lonboard vs IAPro
- Lonboard vs Bidnet Direct
- Lonboard vs eCode360
- Lonboard vs Axon Records
- Lonboard vs CitizenLab
- Lonboard vs ClearGov
- Lonboard vs DemandStar
- Lonboard vs MyRec.com
- Lonboard vs Legistar
- Lonboard vs deck.gl
- Lonboard vs QGIS
- Lonboard vs CARTO
- Lonboard vs Fused
- Lonboard vs Potree
- Lonboard vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Lonboard vs SAGA GIS
- Lonboard vs GRASS GIS
- Lonboard vs WhiteboxTools
- Lonboard vs Kepler.gl
- Lonboard vs Agisoft Metashape
- Lonboard vs Leaflet
- Lonboard vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- Lonboard vs TomTom
- Lonboard vs Transit
- Lonboard vs Waze
- Lonboard vs What3words
- Lonboard vs TomTom Developer Portal

