Testing · head to head
CircleCI vs Split

Split
Testing
Feature flags tied to a metrics pipeline that attributes production impact to each release, now Harness FME
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only CircleCI has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CircleCI the free plan covers 6,000 build minutes and 5 active users a month; Split split is now a module of the Harness platform and split.io redirects to harness.io, so buying it means entering a Harness commercial relationship rather than a standalone flag vendor contract.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CircleCI and Split actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Testing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CircleCI
Nothing recorded that Split does not also cover.
Only in Split
- Feature flags with targeting
- Metrics impact engine
- Guardrail metrics
- Statistical significance testing
- Event ingestion
- SDKs and streaming updates
- Audit and approvals
- Harness platform integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CircleCI
- Continuous integration pipelines for application codenot Split
- Parallel test execution across containersnot Split
- Docker-based builds with layer cachingnot Split
- Deployment pipelines with approval gatesnot Split
- Self-hosted runners for private infrastructurenot Split
Split
- A product organisation that wants every release measured against conversion and latency by default, not only deliberate experimentsnot CircleCI
- Running A/B tests with real statistical significance rather than comparing two dashboard linesnot CircleCI
- Catching a regression at five per cent rollout because a guardrail metric fires before the change reaches everyonenot CircleCI
- A team already committed to Harness for CI and CD that wants flags in the same platform and contractnot CircleCI
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CircleCI
- The free plan covers 6,000 build minutes and 5 active users a month
- Active users are billed at $15 each beyond the included five, and an active user is anyone who commits to a project
- Everything runs on credits, so compute, Docker layer caching at 200 credits a job and IP ranges at 450 credits per GB all draw from the same pool
- Network and storage overage costs 420 credits per GB
- Free credits expire monthly with no rollover, and paid credits expire after a year
- Scale is annual billing only
Split
- Split is now a module of the Harness platform and split.io redirects to harness.io, so buying it means entering a Harness commercial relationship rather than a standalone flag vendor contract.
- Harness no longer publishes per-module prices, so an organisation that wants only feature management cannot get a list price and must negotiate a module out of a platform bundle.
- The measurement engine needs traffic volume to reach significance, so a product with modest usage gets flags with an experimentation layer it will rarely be able to conclude anything from.
- Metric attribution depends on correctly instrumented events flowing into Split, which is an integration project in its own right; without it you have paid for an experimentation platform and are using it as a flag switch.
- As part of a larger DevOps suite the roadmap now competes with CI, CD, security and cloud cost modules for attention, so feature management is no longer the company’s single focus the way it was as an independent product.
Pricing, plan by plan
CircleCI
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 6,000 build minutes (small Docker resource class)
- Up to 5 active users per month
- 30,000 free credits per month
- Performance$15/month
- 30,000 credits included monthly
- 5 active users included (additional users $15/month each)
- 80x concurrency
- Scale$null/year
- Custom number of credits
- Customizable user limits
- Unlimited concurrency
Split
On request- Harness FreeFree
- Harness Open Source and community support
- Intended for individuals and small teams
- Feature management capability limited at this tier
- Harness Essentials$undefined/year
- Bundled DevOps modules including CI, CD, IaC and security testing
- Standard support
- Pricing requires contacting sales
- Harness Enterprise$undefined/year
- Mix and match from 15 or more modules including Feature Management and Experimentation
- Premier support with a dedicated account manager
- Higher pipeline concurrency and organisation limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Split if
- You need feature flags with targeting.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET.
- You also want metrics impact engine.
Questions people ask
- Is CircleCI or Split better?
- Neither clearly leads. CircleCI starts at Free and Split at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CircleCI or Split?
- CircleCI has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CircleCI and On request for Split.
- Does CircleCI or Split run on more platforms?
- CircleCI runs on Web. Split runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET.
- Can I use CircleCI for free?
- Yes. CircleCI has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Split starts at On request.
- What is CircleCI best used for?
- CircleCI is most often used for continuous integration pipelines for application code, parallel test execution across containers, docker-based builds with layer caching, deployment pipelines with approval gates. Of those, continuous integration pipelines for application code and parallel test execution across containers are not what Split is typically brought in for.
- What can CircleCI do that Split cannot?
- Split covers Feature flags with targeting, Metrics impact engine, Guardrail metrics, Statistical significance testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CircleCI: How much does CircleCI Performance plan cost?
CircleCI Performance plan costs $15 USD per month and includes 30,000 credits, 5 active users, 80x concurrency, 5 GB network, and 2 GB storage. Additional users beyond 5 cost $15 each per month.
SourceSplit: Is Split still called Split?
It is now sold as Harness Feature Management and Experimentation after the Harness acquisition, and split.io redirects to harness.io.
CircleCI: Can I purchase additional credits on CircleCI Performance plan?
Yes, additional credits are available at $15 for every 25,000 credits purchased. Paid credits roll over month to month and expire after one year; free plan credits expire monthly without rollover.
SourceSplit: Can I buy just feature flags?
Not from a price list. Harness publishes bundle tiers and directs single-module buyers to sales.
CircleCI: What is included in the CircleCI free plan?
The free plan includes up to 6,000 build minutes per month (small Docker resource class), 5 active users, 30,000 free credits monthly, 30x concurrency, 1 GB network, 2 GB storage, and community support. No credit card required.
SourceSplit: What does it do that a plain flag service does not?
It attributes changes in your product metrics to specific flags with statistical significance testing and alerts on guardrail metrics.
CircleCI: What are the Scale plan limits and pricing?
CircleCI Scale plan offers custom pricing billed annually with unlimited concurrency, 50 GB network, 200 GB storage, customizable credits and users, enterprise controls, and GPU environment access. Requires contacting sales for a quote.
SourceSplit: Do we need a lot of traffic?
Yes. Statistical tests need volume to conclude, so low-traffic products get limited value from the measurement layer.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CircleCI vs GitHub Actions
- CircleCI vs BrowserStack
- CircleCI vs BugHerd
- CircleCI vs Zephyr Scale
- CircleCI vs Playwright
- CircleCI vs Cypress
- CircleCI vs Insomnia
- CircleCI vs mabl
- CircleCI vs Appium
- CircleCI vs Robot Framework
- CircleCI vs TestRail
- CircleCI vs Katalon
- CircleCI vs Xray Test Management
- CircleCI vs JUnit
- CircleCI vs Qase
- CircleCI vs TestNG
- CircleCI vs WebdriverIO
- CircleCI vs Eppo
- CircleCI vs GrowthBook
- CircleCI vs Kameleoon
- CircleCI vs Selenium
- CircleCI vs Sauce Labs
- CircleCI vs Applitools
- CircleCI vs QA Wolf
- CircleCI vs Testsigma
- CircleCI vs Vitest
- CircleCI vs Cucumber
- CircleCI vs Detox
- Split vs GitHub Actions
- Split vs BrowserStack
- Split vs BugHerd
- Split vs Zephyr Scale
- Split vs Playwright
- Split vs Cypress
- Split vs Insomnia
- Split vs mabl
- Split vs Appium
- Split vs Robot Framework
- Split vs TestRail
- Split vs Katalon
- Split vs Xray Test Management
- Split vs JUnit
- Split vs Qase
- Split vs TestNG
- Split vs WebdriverIO
- Split vs Eppo
- Split vs GrowthBook
- Split vs Kameleoon
- Split vs Selenium
- Split vs Sauce Labs
- Split vs Applitools
- Split vs QA Wolf
- Split vs Testsigma
- Split vs Vitest
- Split vs Cucumber
- Split vs Detox

