Cloud · head to head
Cilium vs SST

Cilium
Cloud
eBPF-based networking, observability and security for Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cilium requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments; SST primarily optimized for AWS with Cloudflare support
- They diverge on capability: Cilium covers eBPF datapath, SST covers Single config file.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cilium and SST actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cilium
- eBPF datapath
- Identity-based policy
- Hubble observability
- Sidecar-free mesh
Only in SST
- Single config file
- Resource linking
- Local development
- Multi-cloud support
- Multiple deployment stages
- VPC tunneling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cilium
- Kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based CNI performance degradesnot SST
- Network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile IP rulesnot SST
- Seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is droppingnot SST
SST
- Deploying Next.js frontends with serverless backendsnot Cilium
- Managing databases and storage alongside application codenot Cilium
- Creating staging environments for feature testingnot Cilium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cilium
- Requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- eBPF is genuinely hard to debug when it misbehaves, and the skill is rare on most teams
- Broad scope — CNI, policy, mesh, observability — means the learning curve covers several domains at once
SST
- Primarily optimized for AWS with Cloudflare support
- Learning curve for developers unfamiliar with infrastructure concepts
- Limited documentation for some advanced use cases
Pricing, plan by plan
Cilium
Free- CiliumFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
SST
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the SST review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Cilium if
- You need ebpf datapath.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want identity-based policy.
Choose SST if
- You need single config file.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Cloudflare, Node.js.
- You also want resource linking.
Questions people ask
- Is Cilium or SST better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cilium starts at Free and SST at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cilium or SST?
- Cilium starts at Free and SST at Free.
- Does Cilium or SST run on more platforms?
- Cilium runs on Kubernetes, Linux. SST runs on AWS, Cloudflare, Node.js.
- Can I use Cilium for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cilium best used for?
- Cilium is most often used for kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades, network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules, seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is dropping. Of those, kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades and network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules are not what SST is typically brought in for.
- What can Cilium do that SST cannot?
- Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Identity-based policy, Hubble observability, Sidecar-free mesh. SST covers Single config file, Resource linking, Local development, Multi-cloud support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cilium: Is Cilium free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Isovalent sells an enterprise distribution and support.
SST: Is SST free?
Yes, SST is open source and free. You only pay for cloud resources from AWS and other providers.
SourceCilium: What does eBPF change?
It lets Cilium run packet-processing programs inside the kernel instead of relying on iptables rule chains, which behave poorly as the number of services grows.
SST: What cloud providers does SST support?
SST supports over 150 providers through built-in AWS and Cloudflare components, plus Pulumi and Terraform providers.
SourceCilium: Does Cilium replace a service mesh?
It can cover much of what a mesh does without sidecars, though full mesh feature sets still favour Istio or Linkerd.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cilium vs Grafana Cloud
- Cilium vs Neon
- Cilium vs DigitalOcean
- Cilium vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Cilium vs Pulumi
- Cilium vs Fly.io
- Cilium vs Anyscale
- Cilium vs Fireworks AI
- Cilium vs Podman
- Cilium vs Railway
- Cilium vs Render
- Cilium vs Vault
- Cilium vs Wiz
- Cilium vs Beam Cloud
- Cilium vs Cerebrium
- Cilium vs DeepInfra
- Cilium vs Go
- Cilium vs Azure Functions
- SST vs Grafana Cloud
- SST vs Neon
- SST vs DigitalOcean
- SST vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- SST vs Pulumi
- SST vs Fly.io
- SST vs Anyscale
- SST vs Fireworks AI
- SST vs Podman
- SST vs Railway
- SST vs Render
- SST vs Vault
- SST vs Wiz
- SST vs Beam Cloud
- SST vs Cerebrium
- SST vs DeepInfra
- SST vs Go
- SST vs Azure Functions

