Cloud · head to head
Cilium vs Deno Deploy

Cilium
Cloud
eBPF-based networking, observability and security for Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cilium requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments; Deno Deploy smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations
- They diverge on capability: Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Deno Deploy covers Edge Functions.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cilium and Deno Deploy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cilium | Deno Deploy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Unknown |
| Platforms | Kubernetes, Linux | Cloud/Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cilium
- eBPF datapath
- Identity-based policy
- Hubble observability
- Sidecar-free mesh
Only in Deno Deploy
- Edge Functions
- Deno KV
- Automatic HTTPS
- Global Distribution
- Zero Config Deploy
- Git Integration
- Instant Rollbacks
- Web Standard APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cilium
- Kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based CNI performance degradesnot Deno Deploy
- Network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile IP rulesnot Deno Deploy
- Seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is droppingnot Deno Deploy
Deno Deploy
- API endpointsnot Cilium
- Edge functionsnot Cilium
- Static sitesnot Cilium
- Real-time appsnot Cilium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cilium
- Requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- eBPF is genuinely hard to debug when it misbehaves, and the skill is rare on most teams
- Broad scope — CNI, policy, mesh, observability — means the learning curve covers several domains at once
Deno Deploy
- Smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations
- Less mature than established serverless platforms; newer company and platform
- 1GB deployment size limit may restrict larger applications
- 512MB memory limit lower than some competitors for memory-intensive workloads
- Smaller user base and community compared to Lambda or Netlify
Pricing, plan by plan
Cilium
Free- CiliumFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Deno Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 1M requests/month
- 100GB outbound bandwidth
- 50ms CPU time per request
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited requests
- 5GB KV storage
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Cilium if
- You need ebpf datapath.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want identity-based policy.
Choose Deno Deploy if
- You need edge functions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud/Web.
- You also want deno kv.
Questions people ask
- Is Cilium or Deno Deploy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cilium starts at Free and Deno Deploy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cilium or Deno Deploy?
- Cilium starts at Free and Deno Deploy at Free.
- Does Cilium or Deno Deploy run on more platforms?
- Cilium runs on Kubernetes, Linux. Deno Deploy runs on Cloud/Web.
- Can I use Cilium for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cilium best used for?
- Cilium is most often used for kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades, network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules, seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is dropping. Of those, kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades and network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules are not what Deno Deploy is typically brought in for.
- What can Cilium do that Deno Deploy cannot?
- Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Identity-based policy, Hubble observability, Sidecar-free mesh. Deno Deploy covers Edge Functions, Deno KV, Automatic HTTPS, Global Distribution.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cilium: Is Cilium free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Isovalent sells an enterprise distribution and support.
Deno Deploy: What does Deno Deploy's free tier include?
Deno Deploy free tier includes 1 million requests per month, 100 GB of outbound bandwidth, 50 milliseconds of CPU time per request, 50 custom domains, 1 GiB of KV storage, and up to 5 team members.
SourceCilium: What does eBPF change?
It lets Cilium run packet-processing programs inside the kernel instead of relying on iptables rule chains, which behave poorly as the number of services grows.
Deno Deploy: What are Deno Deploy's Pro plan features and pricing?
Deno Deploy Pro costs $20/month and removes request limits, increases KV storage to 5GB, and includes priority support. Additional storage beyond 5GB costs $0.75/GiB.
SourceCilium: Does Cilium replace a service mesh?
It can cover much of what a mesh does without sidecars, though full mesh feature sets still favour Istio or Linkerd.
Deno Deploy: What are the deployment size and memory limits for Deno Deploy?
The total size of all files within a deployment (source files and static files) should not exceed 1 gigabyte. Applications have a maximum memory allocation of 512MB.
SourceDeno Deploy: Does Deno Deploy support TypeScript natively?
Yes. Deno Deploy runs TypeScript natively with zero-configuration TypeScript support. Code can be written in TypeScript or JavaScript and runs on the same V8 engine.
SourceDeno Deploy: What security features does Deno Deploy provide?
Deno Deploy features an opt-in permission system to mitigate supply chain attacks. Permissions can be explicitly granted for file, network, and environment access, running code securely by default.
SourceRelated pages
More on Deno Deploy
Other head to heads
- Cilium vs Podman
- Cilium vs K3s
- Cilium vs Akamai
- Cilium vs Crossplane
- Cilium vs OpenEBS
- Cilium vs DigitalOcean
- Cilium vs Portworx
- Cilium vs Vault
- Cilium vs Fastly
- Cilium vs HAProxy
- Cilium vs Hetzner Cloud
- Cilium vs Infracost
- Cilium vs Lambda
- Cilium vs Linode
- Cilium vs Northflank
- Cilium vs Oracle Cloud
- Cilium vs Buildah
- Cilium vs Rancher
- Cilium vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Cilium vs Upstash
- Cilium vs Cerebrium
- Cilium vs Beam Cloud
- Cilium vs Serverless Framework
- Cilium vs Koyeb
- Cilium vs Neon
- Cilium vs Pulumi
- Cilium vs Render
- Cilium vs Fly.io
- Cilium vs Fireworks AI
- Cilium vs Orca Security
- Cilium vs Packer
- Cilium vs Porter
- Cilium vs Rook
- Deno Deploy vs Podman
- Deno Deploy vs K3s
- Deno Deploy vs Akamai
- Deno Deploy vs Crossplane
- Deno Deploy vs OpenEBS
- Deno Deploy vs DigitalOcean
- Deno Deploy vs Portworx
- Deno Deploy vs Vault
- Deno Deploy vs Fastly
- Deno Deploy vs HAProxy
- Deno Deploy vs Hetzner Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Infracost
- Deno Deploy vs Lambda
- Deno Deploy vs Linode
- Deno Deploy vs Northflank
- Deno Deploy vs Oracle Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Buildah
- Deno Deploy vs Rancher
- Deno Deploy vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Deno Deploy vs Upstash
- Deno Deploy vs Cerebrium
- Deno Deploy vs Beam Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Serverless Framework
- Deno Deploy vs Koyeb
- Deno Deploy vs Neon
- Deno Deploy vs Pulumi
- Deno Deploy vs Render
- Deno Deploy vs Fly.io
- Deno Deploy vs Fireworks AI
- Deno Deploy vs Orca Security
- Deno Deploy vs Packer
- Deno Deploy vs Porter
- Deno Deploy vs Rook

