Cloud · head to head
Cilium vs Helm

Cilium
Cloud
eBPF-based networking, observability and security for Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cilium requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments; Helm licensed under Apache License 2.0 per the project's GitHub repository (helm/helm LICENSE); as open source software it has no paid tier or vendor price to compare
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cilium and Helm actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cilium
- eBPF datapath
- Identity-based policy
- Hubble observability
- Sidecar-free mesh
Only in Helm
Nothing recorded that Cilium does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cilium
- Kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based CNI performance degradesnot Helm
- Network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile IP rulesnot Helm
- Seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is droppingnot Helm
Helm
- Kubernetes package manager and deployment toolnot Cilium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cilium
- Requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- eBPF is genuinely hard to debug when it misbehaves, and the skill is rare on most teams
- Broad scope — CNI, policy, mesh, observability — means the learning curve covers several domains at once
Helm
- Licensed under Apache License 2.0 per the project's GitHub repository (helm/helm LICENSE); as open source software it has no paid tier or vendor price to compare
- Contributors must sign commits under the Developer Certificate of Origin to have them accepted, per helm.sh, a process requirement not all Kubernetes tools impose
Pricing, plan by plan
Cilium
Free- CiliumFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Helm
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Helm review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Cilium if
- You need ebpf datapath.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want identity-based policy.
Questions people ask
- Is Cilium or Helm better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cilium starts at Free and Helm at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cilium or Helm?
- Cilium starts at Free and Helm at Free.
- Does Cilium or Helm run on more platforms?
- Cilium runs on Kubernetes, Linux. Helm runs on Web.
- Can I use Cilium for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cilium best used for?
- Cilium is most often used for kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades, network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules, seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is dropping. Of those, kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades and network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules are not what Helm is typically brought in for.
- What can Cilium do that Helm cannot?
- Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Identity-based policy, Hubble observability, Sidecar-free mesh.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cilium: Is Cilium free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Isovalent sells an enterprise distribution and support.
Helm: How much does Helm cost?
Helm is free and open-source. It is a graduated project in the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) with no commercial pricing model.
SourceCilium: What does eBPF change?
It lets Cilium run packet-processing programs inside the kernel instead of relying on iptables rule chains, which behave poorly as the number of services grows.
Cilium: Does Cilium replace a service mesh?
It can cover much of what a mesh does without sidecars, though full mesh feature sets still favour Istio or Linkerd.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cilium vs Podman
- Cilium vs K3s
- Cilium vs Akamai
- Cilium vs Crossplane
- Cilium vs OpenEBS
- Cilium vs DigitalOcean
- Cilium vs Portworx
- Cilium vs Vault
- Cilium vs Fastly
- Cilium vs HAProxy
- Cilium vs Hetzner Cloud
- Cilium vs Infracost
- Cilium vs Lambda
- Cilium vs Linode
- Cilium vs Northflank
- Cilium vs Oracle Cloud
- Cilium vs Buildah
- Cilium vs Rancher
- Cilium vs pnpm
- Cilium vs Visual Studio Code
- Cilium vs ESLint
- Cilium vs Turborepo
- Cilium vs Argo CD
- Cilium vs Yarn
- Cilium vs Nix
- Cilium vs Okteto
- Cilium vs Moonrepo
- Cilium vs Nx Cloud
- Cilium vs Pants Build
- Cilium vs Buildkite
- Cilium vs Ansible
- Cilium vs Helix
- Cilium vs JetBrains Rider
- Cilium vs Spacelift
- Helm vs Podman
- Helm vs K3s
- Helm vs Akamai
- Helm vs Crossplane
- Helm vs OpenEBS
- Helm vs DigitalOcean
- Helm vs Portworx
- Helm vs Vault
- Helm vs Fastly
- Helm vs HAProxy
- Helm vs Hetzner Cloud
- Helm vs Infracost
- Helm vs Lambda
- Helm vs Linode
- Helm vs Northflank
- Helm vs Oracle Cloud
- Helm vs Buildah
- Helm vs Rancher
- Helm vs pnpm
- Helm vs Visual Studio Code
- Helm vs ESLint
- Helm vs Turborepo
- Helm vs Argo CD
- Helm vs Yarn
- Helm vs Nix
- Helm vs Okteto
- Helm vs Moonrepo
- Helm vs Nx Cloud
- Helm vs Pants Build
- Helm vs Buildkite
- Helm vs Ansible
- Helm vs Helix
- Helm vs JetBrains Rider
- Helm vs Spacelift
