Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Puppet

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Puppet no pricing published for commercial tiers; requires contacting sales
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Puppet covers Manifests.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Puppet actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Puppet |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | quote |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Linux, Windows, Mac, Api |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cloud |
| Founded | Unknown | 2005 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Puppet
- Manifests
- Modules
- Classes
- Variables
- Facts
- Puppet Master
- Hiera
- Facter
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Puppet
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Puppet
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Puppet
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Puppet
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Puppet
Puppet
- Infrastructure automationnot Chainguard
- Configuration managementnot Chainguard
- DevOps at scalenot Chainguard
- Enterprise infrastructurenot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Puppet
- No pricing published for commercial tiers; requires contacting sales
- Enterprise and Advanced tiers require custom quote
- Free tier limited to 25 nodes maximum
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Puppet
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 25 nodes
- Core Commercial$null/custom
- 25+ nodes
- Vendor-backed SLAs
- Training with Certified Engineers
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Web GUI
- RBAC
- Multi-environment support
- Advanced$null/custom
- AI-powered features
- Advanced patching
- Vulnerability remediation
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Puppet if
- You need manifests.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- You also want modules.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Puppet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Puppet at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Puppet?
- Chainguard starts at Free and Puppet at Free.
- Does Chainguard or Puppet run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Puppet runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Puppet is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Puppet cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Puppet covers Manifests, Modules, Classes, Variables.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourcePuppet: How much does Puppet cost?
Puppet's Developer tier is free for up to 25 nodes. Commercial, Enterprise, and Advanced tiers require contacting their sales team for a custom quote.
SourceChainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourcePuppet: Is there a free version of Puppet?
Yes, Puppet's Developer tier is free forever for up to 25 nodes of infrastructure.
SourceChainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourcePuppet: What does the Enterprise tier include?
Puppet's Enterprise tier includes web GUI, RBAC, and multi-environment support for organizations managing infrastructure at scale, with pricing available upon request.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Chainguard vs DigitalOcean
- Chainguard vs Grafana Cloud
- Chainguard vs Neon
- Chainguard vs Chef
- Chainguard vs Packer
- Chainguard vs Google Cloud Platform
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Azure
- Chainguard vs Lambda
- Chainguard vs Oracle Cloud
- Chainguard vs Akamai
- Chainguard vs IBM Cloud
- Chainguard vs Jaeger
- Chainguard vs Linode
- Chainguard vs Northflank
- Chainguard vs Longhorn
- Chainguard vs minikube
- Puppet vs Snyk
- Puppet vs Trivy
- Puppet vs Doppler
- Puppet vs Infisical
- Puppet vs Grype
- Puppet vs Arnica
- Puppet vs HashiCorp Vault
- Puppet vs Bitwarden
- Puppet vs Semgrep
- Puppet vs Authelia
- Puppet vs Endor Labs
- Puppet vs Tenable
- Puppet vs Hanwha Vision
- Puppet vs Idira
- Puppet vs IVPN
- Puppet vs Logto
- Puppet vs Malwarebytes
- Puppet vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Puppet vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Puppet vs DigitalOcean
- Puppet vs Grafana Cloud
- Puppet vs Neon
- Puppet vs Chef
- Puppet vs Packer
- Puppet vs Google Cloud Platform
- Puppet vs Microsoft Azure
- Puppet vs Lambda
- Puppet vs Oracle Cloud
- Puppet vs Akamai
- Puppet vs IBM Cloud
- Puppet vs Jaeger
- Puppet vs Linode
- Puppet vs Northflank
- Puppet vs Longhorn
- Puppet vs minikube

