Cloud · head to head
Cerebrium vs Restate

Cerebrium
Cloud
Serverless GPU infrastructure for real-time AI inference and applications
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Restate
Developer Tools
Durable execution engine in Rust with a free tier and low-latency workflows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cerebrium free Hobby tier limited to 3 apps and 5 GPU concurrency; Restate the runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone.
- They diverge on capability: Cerebrium covers Ultra-fast cold starts, Restate covers Durable execution.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cerebrium and Restate actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cerebrium
- Ultra-fast cold starts
- Elastic scaling
- Bring your own code
- Multi-region failover
- WebSocket and streaming
- Asynchronous jobs
- CI/CD with gradual rollouts
- OpenTelemetry integration
Only in Restate
- Durable execution
- Virtual objects
- Single binary runtime
- Multi-language SDKs
- Workflows and sagas
- Restate Cloud
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cerebrium
- Deploying voice agents and conversational AI applicationsnot Restate
- Video and image model serving with low latencynot Restate
- LLM inference and completion endpointsnot Restate
- Real-time embeddings and vector database operationsnot Restate
- Distributed model training with hyperparameter sweepsnot Restate
Restate
- Payment or order flows where a crash between two external API calls must not double-charge or lose the ordernot Cerebrium
- AI agent loops that call tools over minutes or hours and must survive a deployment mid-runnot Cerebrium
- Replacing hand-rolled retry, idempotency key and outbox code across a set of microservicesnot Cerebrium
- A small team that wants durable workflows without operating a Temporal cluster and its databasenot Cerebrium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cerebrium
- Free Hobby tier limited to 3 apps and 5 GPU concurrency
- Standard plan at $100/month required for production deployments
- Per-second compute pricing requires continuous cost monitoring
- Storage costs add up for large model files
Restate
- The runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone.
- Restate Cloud jumps from a free fifty thousand actions straight to 300 US dollars a month for twenty million, so a workload sitting at a few hundred thousand actions pays enterprise-shaped money for hobby-shaped volume.
- It is a young project against Temporal’s established base, so hiring engineers who already know it is unrealistic and the answer to most questions is in the docs rather than on Stack Overflow.
- The programming model requires structuring code around durable handlers and virtual objects, which is a genuine rewrite for existing services rather than a library you add.
- The single-binary simplicity that makes small deployments cheap also means fewer operational knobs at very large scale than a system designed as separable components.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cerebrium
Free- HobbyFree
- 3 user seats
- Up to 3 deployed apps
- 5 GPU concurrency
- Standard$100/month
- Unlimited seats and apps
- 30 GPU concurrency
- Custom domains
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Unlimited resources
- Volume discounts
- Dedicated support
- GPU Compute$undefined/per-second
- T4: $0.000164/s
- H100: $0.00167/s
Restate
Free- FreeFree
- Fifty thousand durable actions per month
- No credit card required
- Community support
- Starter$300/month
- Twenty million actions per month
- Two hundred actions per second, bursting to one thousand
- Twenty GB storage
- Pro$1000/month
- Fifty million actions per month
- Five hundred actions per second, bursting to two thousand
- Fifty GB storage
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume
- Twenty-four seven P0 support
- 99.99 per cent SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Cerebrium if
- You need ultra-fast cold starts.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Docker.
- You also want elastic scaling.
Choose Restate if
- You need durable execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Web.
- You also want virtual objects.
Questions people ask
- Is Cerebrium or Restate better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cerebrium starts at Free and Restate at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cerebrium or Restate?
- Cerebrium starts at Free and Restate at Free.
- Does Cerebrium or Restate run on more platforms?
- Cerebrium runs on Cloud, Docker. Restate runs on Linux, macOS, Web.
- Can I use Cerebrium for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cerebrium best used for?
- Cerebrium is most often used for deploying voice agents and conversational ai applications, video and image model serving with low latency, llm inference and completion endpoints, real-time embeddings and vector database operations. Of those, deploying voice agents and conversational ai applications and video and image model serving with low latency are not what Restate is typically brought in for.
- What can Cerebrium do that Restate cannot?
- Cerebrium covers Ultra-fast cold starts, Elastic scaling, Bring your own code, Multi-region failover. Restate covers Durable execution, Virtual objects, Single binary runtime, Multi-language SDKs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cerebrium: Is Cerebrium only for inference or can it train models?
Cerebrium supports both inference serving and model training with hyperparameter sweeps. It enables deployment of voice agents, LLMs, video models, and other AI applications.
SourceRestate: Is Restate open source?
The SDKs are MIT. The runtime is under a Business Source Licence, which permits self-hosting but not offering it as a competing service.
Cerebrium: How do the cold starts compare to other platforms?
Cerebrium achieves 2-4 second cold starts through memory and GPU snapshotting, significantly faster than traditional 30+ second cold boots. This is competitive with platforms like Beam Cloud.
SourceRestate: How does it compare with Temporal?
Same problem, different shape: one Rust binary with embedded storage instead of a server plus database plus workers, and lower per-step latency.
Cerebrium: What compliance certifications does Cerebrium have?
Cerebrium maintains SOC 2 Type II compliance, HIPAA certification, GDPR compliance, and ISO certification. It provides gVisor container isolation and configurable data residency for regulated workloads.
SourceRestate: Is there a free tier?
Yes, fifty thousand durable actions a month on Restate Cloud with no card required.
Restate: Which languages are supported?
TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Go, Python and Rust.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cerebrium vs Beam Cloud
- Cerebrium vs Lambda
- Cerebrium vs Anyscale
- Cerebrium vs Koyeb
- Cerebrium vs Deno Deploy
- Cerebrium vs Serverless Framework
- Cerebrium vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Cerebrium vs Upstash
- Cerebrium vs Neon
- Cerebrium vs Fireworks AI
- Cerebrium vs Porter
- Cerebrium vs Fastly
- Cerebrium vs Kustomize
- Cerebrium vs Microsoft Azure
- Cerebrium vs Nitric
- Cerebrium vs Nomad
- Cerebrium vs Linkerd
- Cerebrium vs Helix
- Cerebrium vs Rust
- Cerebrium vs Atlantis
- Cerebrium vs Jitsu
- Cerebrium vs Okteto
- Cerebrium vs Argo CD
- Cerebrium vs Steampipe
- Cerebrium vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Cerebrium vs Deno
- Cerebrium vs Visual Studio Code
- Cerebrium vs Turborepo
- Cerebrium vs Keycloak
- Cerebrium vs Garden
- Cerebrium vs GitLab CI/CD
- Cerebrium vs HCP Terraform
- Cerebrium vs Helm
- Cerebrium vs Notepad++
- Restate vs Beam Cloud
- Restate vs Lambda
- Restate vs Anyscale
- Restate vs Koyeb
- Restate vs Deno Deploy
- Restate vs Serverless Framework
- Restate vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Restate vs Upstash
- Restate vs Neon
- Restate vs Fireworks AI
- Restate vs Porter
- Restate vs Fastly
- Restate vs Kustomize
- Restate vs Microsoft Azure
- Restate vs Nitric
- Restate vs Nomad
- Restate vs Linkerd
- Restate vs Helix
- Restate vs Rust
- Restate vs Atlantis
- Restate vs Jitsu
- Restate vs Okteto
- Restate vs Argo CD
- Restate vs Steampipe
- Restate vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Restate vs Deno
- Restate vs Visual Studio Code
- Restate vs Turborepo
- Restate vs Keycloak
- Restate vs Garden
- Restate vs GitLab CI/CD
- Restate vs HCP Terraform
- Restate vs Helm
- Restate vs Notepad++
