Agriculture · head to head
Case IH AFS Connect vs Taranis

Case IH AFS Connect
Agriculture
Telematics and farm data platform for Case IH machinery, now delivered as FieldOps
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Case IH AFS Connect coverage of non-Case IH machinery is thin, so a mixed-colour fleet ends up running two portals and reconciling the data by hand or through a third-party platform.; Taranis pricing is by quote only, with no rate, per acre figure or minimum published; the only route to a price is a Get a Demo request
- They diverge on capability: Case IH AFS Connect covers Machine telemetry, Taranis covers Ultra-high resolution imagery.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Case IH AFS Connect and Taranis actually diverge.
| Attribute | Case IH AFS Connect | Taranis |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $5/acre/year |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Ios, Android, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Case IH AFS Connect
- Machine telemetry
- Remote display view
- Two-way file transfer
- Yield and coverage mapping
- Fleet dashboards
- Data sharing and APIs
- FieldOps mobile app
Only in Taranis
- Ultra-high resolution imagery
- AI insect detection
- Disease identification
- Weed pressure mapping
- Nutrient deficiency analysis
- Stand & emergence counts
- Prescription maps
- Mobile scouting app
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Case IH AFS Connect
- A row-crop operation running a Case IH Magnum and Axial-Flow fleet that wants as-applied and yield data off the machines without USB sticksnot Taranis
- A farm manager who needs to talk an inexperienced operator through a display setting during harvest without driving to the fieldnot Taranis
- A dealer service department diagnosing an alert remotely before deciding whether to dispatch a techniciannot Taranis
- An operation buying new Case IH iron after October 2024 that wants connected features without an annual telematics renewalnot Taranis
Taranis
- Leaf-level crop scouting from submillimeter resolution drone imagerynot Case IH AFS Connect
- Agronomic advisors documenting in-season crop issues for grower customersnot Case IH AFS Connect
- Detecting weeds, insects and disease across whole fields without walking themnot Case IH AFS Connect
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Case IH AFS Connect
- Coverage of non-Case IH machinery is thin, so a mixed-colour fleet ends up running two portals and reconciling the data by hand or through a third-party platform.
- The agronomic side is weaker than software-first platforms: field records, input tracking and compliance reporting are shallower than Agworld or Conservis and most serious growers export to something else.
- The entry cost is hardware, not software; a Pro 1200 display and receiver retrofit runs into five figures per machine, which is the real barrier for anyone hoping to add the platform to an older tractor.
- Connectivity Included only applies to qualifying machines from October 2024 onward, so a farm with a five-year-old fleet still faces a per-machine dealer activation fee and older modems may not be eligible at all.
- Dealer dependency is total: activations, subscription changes and most troubleshooting route through the dealer rather than a self-service portal, which makes response times a function of your local dealership rather than CNH.
Taranis
- Pricing is by quote only, with no rate, per acre figure or minimum published; the only route to a price is a Get a Demo request
- Insights depend on Taranis flying drones over the acres in question rather than on grower-supplied data
- The product is positioned for agronomic advisors serving growers rather than for direct grower purchase
Pricing, plan by plan
Case IH AFS Connect
On request- AFS Connect / FieldOps$undefined/year
- Included with qualifying machines built and purchased after 1 October 2024
- One-time dealer activation fee for older machines with a compatible modem
- Display and receiver hardware quoted separately by the dealer
Taranis
$5/acre/year- Scout$5/acre/year
- AI pest detection
- Disease identification
- Weed mapping
- Scout Plus$8/acre/year
- Everything in Scout
- Stand counts
- Nutrient deficiency
- Enterprise$undefined/acre/year
- Everything in Scout Plus
- Custom models
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Case IH AFS Connect if
- You need machine telemetry.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want remote display view.
Choose Taranis if
- You need ultra-high resolution imagery.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want ai insect detection.
Questions people ask
- Is Case IH AFS Connect or Taranis better?
- Neither clearly leads. Case IH AFS Connect starts at On request and Taranis at $5/acre/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Case IH AFS Connect or Taranis?
- Case IH AFS Connect starts at On request and Taranis at $5/acre/year.
- Does Case IH AFS Connect or Taranis run on more platforms?
- Case IH AFS Connect runs on Web, iOS, Android. Taranis runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- What is Case IH AFS Connect best used for?
- Case IH AFS Connect is most often used for a row-crop operation running a case ih magnum and axial-flow fleet that wants as-applied and yield data off the machines without usb sticks, a farm manager who needs to talk an inexperienced operator through a display setting during harvest without driving to the field, a dealer service department diagnosing an alert remotely before deciding whether to dispatch a technician, an operation buying new case ih iron after october 2024 that wants connected features without an annual telematics renewal. Of those, a row-crop operation running a case ih magnum and axial-flow fleet that wants as-applied and yield data off the machines without usb sticks and a farm manager who needs to talk an inexperienced operator through a display setting during harvest without driving to the field are not what Taranis is typically brought in for.
- What can Case IH AFS Connect do that Taranis cannot?
- Case IH AFS Connect covers Machine telemetry, Remote display view, Two-way file transfer, Yield and coverage mapping. Taranis covers Ultra-high resolution imagery, AI insect detection, Disease identification, Weed pressure mapping.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Case IH AFS Connect: Is AFS Connect the same thing as FieldOps?
FieldOps is the rebuilt CNH portal and app that AFS Connect accounts have been migrating into. The underlying machine connectivity is the same; the branding and interface changed.
Taranis: How much does Taranis cost?
Taranis does not publish pricing on its website. Three service plans (Advanced+, Elite+, Pro+) are described, but customers must contact the company for pricing details.
SourceCase IH AFS Connect: Do I still pay an annual subscription?
Not on qualifying machines built and purchased from 1 October 2024, where connectivity is included. Older machines with a compatible modem can be activated through a dealer for a one-time fee.
Taranis: What is included in Taranis plans?
Taranis plans include features like satellite monitoring, AI-driven leaf-level insights, seasonal analysis, historic data access, and 24/7 support, but pricing and plan-specific details require contacting sales.
SourceCase IH AFS Connect: Can I use it with John Deere or New Holland machines in the same fleet?
Not natively in any useful way. New Holland shares CNH infrastructure but sits in its own portal, and Deere data has to come in through API sharing or a third-party farm management platform.
Case IH AFS Connect: What does it cost to add to a used tractor?
The subscription may be cheap or free, but the display, receiver and modem retrofit are the cost, and those are quoted per machine by the dealer into five figures.
Related pages
More on Case IH AFS Connect
Other head to heads
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Trimble Ag Software
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Conservis
- Case IH AFS Connect vs John Deere Operations Center
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Granular
- Case IH AFS Connect vs FarmLogs
- Case IH AFS Connect vs MyJohnDeere
- Case IH AFS Connect vs CeresAI
- Case IH AFS Connect vs fieldmargin
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Tend
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Teralytic
- Case IH AFS Connect vs CropX
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Farmers Edge
- Case IH AFS Connect vs FarmWorks
- Case IH AFS Connect vs FieldView Plus
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Gallagher eShepherd
- Case IH AFS Connect vs GAMAYA
- Case IH AFS Connect vs AgriSync
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Bushel
- Case IH AFS Connect vs OneSoil
- Case IH AFS Connect vs PrecisionHawk
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Arable
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Connecterra
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Toro Lynx Central Control
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Valley Irrigation
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Baseline Irrigation
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Galcon
- Case IH AFS Connect vs GEA DairyNet
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Halter
- Taranis vs Trimble Ag Software
- Taranis vs Conservis
- Taranis vs John Deere Operations Center
- Taranis vs Granular
- Taranis vs FarmLogs
- Taranis vs MyJohnDeere
- Taranis vs CeresAI
- Taranis vs fieldmargin
- Taranis vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Taranis vs Tend
- Taranis vs Teralytic
- Taranis vs CropX
- Taranis vs Farmers Edge
- Taranis vs FarmWorks
- Taranis vs FieldView Plus
- Taranis vs Gallagher eShepherd
- Taranis vs GAMAYA
- Taranis vs AgriSync
- Taranis vs Bushel
- Taranis vs OneSoil
- Taranis vs PrecisionHawk
- Taranis vs Arable
- Taranis vs Connecterra
- Taranis vs Toro Lynx Central Control
- Taranis vs Valley Irrigation
- Taranis vs Baseline Irrigation
- Taranis vs Galcon
- Taranis vs GEA DairyNet
- Taranis vs Halter

