Cloud · head to head
CapRover vs Deno

CapRover
Cloud
Free self-hosted platform built on Docker Swarm with a dashboard and automatic certificates
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Deno
Developer Tools
A fast, open-source, fully Node-compatible JS runtime with TypeScript baked right in
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CapRover since June 2026 one pseudonymous account wrote 97 of roughly 100 commits and the next human contributor wrote one, so there is no identifiable person or company to contract with, escalate to or hold responsible.; Deno egress bandwidth overage costs $0.20/GB which can become expensive for high-traffic applications
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CapRover and Deno actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CapRover
- One-click applications
- Automatic certificates
- Web dashboard
- Multiple deploy paths
- Docker Swarm clustering
- Custom nginx configuration
Only in Deno
Nothing recorded that CapRover does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CapRover
- Running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificatesnot Deno
- A two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one boxnot Deno
- Standing up one-click databases and internal tools without writing Compose filesnot Deno
- Hosting client demos cheaply where downtime is inconvenient rather than expensivenot Deno
Deno
- Running TypeScript natively without transpilation overheadnot CapRover
- Migrating Node.js applications to secure-by-default runtimenot CapRover
- Deploying edge functions and serverless containers seamlesslynot CapRover
- Consolidating developer tools into single binarynot CapRover
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CapRover
- Since June 2026 one pseudonymous account wrote 97 of roughly 100 commits and the next human contributor wrote one, so there is no identifiable person or company to contract with, escalate to or hold responsible.
- Donations over the last twelve months totalled 285 US dollars and there is no commercial tier, so no paid support exists at any price and no maintenance commitment is funded.
- The LICENSE file is Apache 2.0 with a superseding appendix that bans redistributing a paid version and refers to paid features that do not yet exist, and GitHub cannot classify it, so the terms already anticipate a commercial change of direction.
- Releases arrive in bursts with an eleven month gap between September 2023 and August 2024 and two further gaps of about six months since, so there is no basis for assuming a security fix will land promptly.
- The backup feature is documented as experimental, covers only the CapRover configuration directory and explicitly excludes persistent volumes and container images, so every database has to be dumped separately with its container stopped.
Deno
- Egress bandwidth overage costs $0.20/GB which can become expensive for high-traffic applications
- CPU time overage is $0.10/hour on Pro and Builder tiers, adding to costs for compute-intensive workloads
- Enterprise pricing is not disclosed; requires sales contact
Pricing, plan by plan
CapRover
Free- CapRoverFree
- No paid tier and no hosted offering
- Unlimited applications, servers and users
- Community support through Slack and GitHub
Deno
Free- FreeFree
- 1 million requests/month
- 20GB egress bandwidth
- 10 apps
- Pro$20/month
- 5 million requests/month
- 200GB egress
- 50 apps
- Builder$200/month
- 25 million requests/month
- 2,000GB egress
- 10,000 apps
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom limits on all metrics
- 99.95% reliability SLA
- Email support with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose CapRover if
- You need one-click applications.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- You also want automatic certificates.
Questions people ask
- Is CapRover or Deno better?
- Neither clearly leads. CapRover starts at Free and Deno at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CapRover or Deno?
- CapRover starts at Free and Deno at Free.
- Does CapRover or Deno run on more platforms?
- CapRover runs on Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted. Deno runs on Web.
- Can I use CapRover for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CapRover best used for?
- CapRover is most often used for running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificates, a two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one box, standing up one-click databases and internal tools without writing compose files, hosting client demos cheaply where downtime is inconvenient rather than expensive. Of those, running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificates and a two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one box are not what Deno is typically brought in for.
- What can CapRover do that Deno cannot?
- CapRover covers One-click applications, Automatic certificates, Web dashboard, Multiple deploy paths.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CapRover: Does CapRover cost anything?
No. There is no paid tier and no hosted version. The only income is donations, which came to 285 US dollars over the last twelve months.
Deno: How much does Deno Deploy cost?
Deno Deploy offers a free tier at $0/month, Pro at $20/month, and Builder at $200/month. Enterprise has custom pricing. All plans include base request and bandwidth limits, with overage charges for additional usage.
SourceCapRover: Is the licence really Apache 2.0?
Not quite. The LICENSE file is Apache 2.0 plus an appendix that supersedes it in case of conflict, forbidding modification of paid features and redistribution of a paid version. GitHub does not recognise the result as a standard licence.
Deno: What are Deno Deploy's overage charges?
Egress bandwidth overages cost $0.20 per GB. CPU time overages are $0.10 per hour on Pro and Builder tiers. Memory time and KV database operations also incur charges beyond included limits.
SourceCapRover: Does the backup feature protect my databases?
No. It backs up the CapRover configuration directory only and explicitly excludes persistent directories and container images. You have to dump each database yourself with the container stopped.
Deno: How many apps can I deploy on Deno's free plan?
The free tier includes 10 apps with up to 1 concurrent build. Pro tier supports 50 apps with 3 concurrent builds, and Builder supports 10,000 apps with 20 concurrent builds.
SourceCapRover: Can I move off Docker Swarm later?
Not without rebuilding. CapRover is architecturally tied to Swarm, so outgrowing it means migrating applications to a different platform rather than switching a scheduler.
Deno: How many team members can access Deno Deploy?
The free tier supports up to 3 team members. Pro supports 10 team members. Builder supports 25 team members. Enterprise has custom seat limits.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- CapRover vs Render
- CapRover vs K3s
- CapRover vs DigitalOcean
- CapRover vs Coolify
- CapRover vs Dokku
- CapRover vs Qovery
- CapRover vs Porter
- CapRover vs Railway
- CapRover vs Fly.io
- CapRover vs Northflank
- CapRover vs SST
- CapRover vs Heroku
- CapRover vs Jaeger
- CapRover vs Lambda
- CapRover vs Linode
- CapRover vs Longhorn
- CapRover vs minikube
- CapRover vs Turborepo
- CapRover vs ESLint
- CapRover vs pnpm
- CapRover vs Visual Studio Code
- CapRover vs Jitsu
- CapRover vs Argo CD
- CapRover vs Git
- CapRover vs Soketi
- CapRover vs Bazel
- CapRover vs Pants Build
- CapRover vs Tilt
- CapRover vs Dagger
- CapRover vs RAD Studio
- CapRover vs Refact
- CapRover vs Restate
- CapRover vs RubyMine
- CapRover vs SonarQube
- Deno vs Render
- Deno vs K3s
- Deno vs DigitalOcean
- Deno vs Coolify
- Deno vs Dokku
- Deno vs Qovery
- Deno vs Porter
- Deno vs Railway
- Deno vs Fly.io
- Deno vs Northflank
- Deno vs SST
- Deno vs Heroku
- Deno vs Jaeger
- Deno vs Lambda
- Deno vs Linode
- Deno vs Longhorn
- Deno vs minikube
- Deno vs Turborepo
- Deno vs ESLint
- Deno vs pnpm
- Deno vs Visual Studio Code
- Deno vs Jitsu
- Deno vs Argo CD
- Deno vs Git
- Deno vs Soketi
- Deno vs Bazel
- Deno vs Pants Build
- Deno vs Tilt
- Deno vs Dagger
- Deno vs RAD Studio
- Deno vs Refact
- Deno vs Restate
- Deno vs RubyMine
- Deno vs SonarQube
