Software · head to head
Convex vs Vitess
Convex
Software
The reactive backend platform that keeps up with you and your agents
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Vitess
Software
Scalable database clustering system for horizontal scaling of MySQL
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Vitess has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Convex the Free and Starter tier includes only 1 million function calls and 0.5 GB of database storage per month before per-unit overage charges of $2.20 per million calls apply, as of August 2026.; Vitess vTGate scatter queries without sharding key incur significant performance penalties
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convex and Vitess actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convex
Nothing recorded that Vitess does not also cover.
Only in Vitess
- Horizontal Sharding
- Connection Pooling
- Query Routing
- Online Schema Changes
- Shard Management
- Replication Management
- Automated Failover
- MySQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convex
No use cases recorded yet. See the Convex review.
Vitess
- Transaction processingnot Convex
- Data storagenot Convex
- Application backendnot Convex
- Reportingnot Convex
- Data analyticsnot Convex
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convex
- The Free and Starter tier includes only 1 million function calls and 0.5 GB of database storage per month before per-unit overage charges of $2.20 per million calls apply, as of August 2026.
Vitess
- VTGate scatter queries without sharding key incur significant performance penalties
- Foreign key constraints not enforced across shards, requiring application-level integrity handling
- Single primary per keyspace limits multi-region write capabilities
- Distributed transactions without proper sharding key routing suffer performance degradation
Pricing, plan by plan
Convex
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Convex review.
Vitess
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Vitess review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Convex if
Nothing in the data separates Convex from Vitess on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Vitess if
- You need horizontal sharding.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want connection pooling.
Questions people ask
- Is Convex or Vitess better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convex starts at On request and Vitess at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convex or Vitess?
- Vitess has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Convex and Free for Vitess.
- Does Convex or Vitess run on more platforms?
- Convex runs on Web. Vitess runs on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Vitess for free?
- Yes. Vitess has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Convex starts at On request.
- What can Convex do that Vitess cannot?
- Vitess covers Horizontal Sharding, Connection Pooling, Query Routing, Online Schema Changes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Vitess: Is Vitess free to use?
Yes. Vitess is completely free and open source under the Apache 2.0 license. It is a graduated CNCF project with no licensing costs or pricing tiers.
SourceVitess: What databases does Vitess support?
Vitess supports MySQL and MariaDB as backend databases. It acts as a middleware layer that adds sharding and orchestration capabilities on top of these databases.
SourceVitess: Does Vitess require Kubernetes to run?
No. Vitess can run on Kubernetes using the Vitess Operator, but it can also be deployed on traditional infrastructure. Kubernetes integration is optional and provides additional automation benefits.
SourceVitess: How does Vitess handle cross-shard transactions?
Vitess supports distributed transactions across shards, but they require queries to be routed through the sharding key. Transactions without a proper sharding key can result in slower performance.
SourceVitess: Does Vitess enforce foreign key constraints?
Vitess does not enforce foreign key constraints across shards by default. Referential integrity must be managed at the application layer, though per-database support can be enabled with limitations.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs Elasticsearch
- Convex vs PlanetScale
- Convex vs Azure SQL
- Convex vs ClickHouse
- Convex vs Couchbase
- Convex vs DuckDB
- Convex vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs MariaDB
- Convex vs Oracle Database
- Convex vs Amazon RDS
- Convex vs Amazon Redshift
- Convex vs Apache Druid
- Convex vs Cassandra
- Convex vs CouchDB
- Vitess vs Cockroach Labs
- Vitess vs PostgreSQL
- Vitess vs Airtable
- Vitess vs Amazon Aurora
- Vitess vs Elasticsearch
- Vitess vs PlanetScale
- Vitess vs Azure SQL
- Vitess vs ClickHouse
- Vitess vs Couchbase
- Vitess vs DuckDB
- Vitess vs DynamoDB
- Vitess vs MariaDB
- Vitess vs Oracle Database
- Vitess vs Amazon RDS
- Vitess vs Amazon Redshift
- Vitess vs Apache Druid
- Vitess vs Cassandra
- Vitess vs CouchDB
