Developer Tools · head to head
Buildkite vs Fig

Buildkite
Developer Tools
CI/CD pipelines that run on your own compute
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Buildkite free plan caps at 5 users and 10 concurrent jobs, with 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes per month and 30 day build retention; Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Buildkite and Fig actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Buildkite
- CI/CD pipeline automationnot Fig
- Test execution at scalenot Fig
- Deployment automationnot Fig
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Buildkite
- Free plan caps at 5 users and 10 concurrent jobs, with 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes per month and 30 day build retention
- Pro plan is $30 per active user per month, capped at 50 users, with only 10 of the up to 250 concurrent agents included before extra usage
- Enterprise plan enforces a 30 user minimum even though pricing itself is custom
- Hosted compute beyond included minutes is metered at $0.004 per vCPU minute on Linux and $0.02 per vCPU minute on Mac
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Pricing, plan by plan
Buildkite
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 10 concurrent jobs
- 2000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly
- Pro$30/month
- Up to 50 users
- 250 concurrent agents (10 included)
- 4000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited users (30 minimum)
- Custom usage limits
- Full platform access
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Buildkite or Fig better?
- Neither clearly leads. Buildkite starts at Free and Fig at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Buildkite or Fig?
- Buildkite starts at Free and Fig at Free.
- Does Buildkite or Fig run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Buildkite for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Buildkite best used for?
- Buildkite is most often used for ci/cd pipeline automation, test execution at scale, deployment automation. Of those, ci/cd pipeline automation and test execution at scale are not what Fig is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Buildkite: Can I use Buildkite without paying?
Yes, Buildkite offers a free plan that includes up to 5 users, 10 concurrent jobs, 2000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly, and 250k test executions per month at no cost.
SourceBuildkite: What happens if I exceed my included compute minutes on Buildkite?
Hosted agent compute is charged separately at $0.004 per Linux vCPU minute and $0.02 per Mac vCPU minute, billed to the second with no minimums.
SourceBuildkite: Do I need an annual commitment for Buildkite's Pro plan?
No, Buildkite's Pro plan is billed monthly at $30 per active user with no long-term contract required. All tiers include a 30-day all-access trial.
SourceBuildkite: What user limits apply to each Buildkite plan?
Free plan supports up to 5 users, Pro plan supports up to 50 users, and Enterprise plan provides unlimited users with a 30-user minimum.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Buildkite vs Depot
- Buildkite vs Dagger
- Buildkite vs pnpm
- Buildkite vs Turborepo
- Buildkite vs Visual Studio Code
- Buildkite vs ESLint
- Buildkite vs GitLab CI/CD
- Buildkite vs Keycloak
- Buildkite vs Nx Cloud
- Buildkite vs Yarn
- Buildkite vs Atlantis
- Buildkite vs Coder
- Buildkite vs HCP Terraform
- Buildkite vs Helm
- Buildkite vs Jitsu
- Buildkite vs Notepad++
- Buildkite vs Prettier
- Buildkite vs Sweep
- Buildkite vs Cody
- Buildkite vs Warp
- Buildkite vs Rust
- Buildkite vs CodeSandbox
- Buildkite vs Vite
- Buildkite vs Daytona
- Buildkite vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Buildkite vs GNU Emacs
- Buildkite vs Keil MDK
- Buildkite vs Bazel
- Fig vs Depot
- Fig vs Dagger
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs GitLab CI/CD
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Nx Cloud
- Fig vs Yarn
- Fig vs Atlantis
- Fig vs Coder
- Fig vs HCP Terraform
- Fig vs Helm
- Fig vs Jitsu
- Fig vs Notepad++
- Fig vs Prettier
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs GNU Emacs
- Fig vs Keil MDK
- Fig vs Bazel
