Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs SolidStart

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

SolidStart
Web Development
Full-stack meta-framework for SolidJS with fine-grained reactivity
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; SolidStart smaller ecosystem compared to Next.js or Remix due to relative newness
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, SolidStart covers Fine-grained reactivity.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and SolidStart actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | SolidStart |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | open-source |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Web Development |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in SolidStart
- Fine-grained reactivity
- Server actions
- Single-flight mutations
- Request deduplication
- Multi-router support
- Automatic API generation
- Vite integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot SolidStart
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot SolidStart
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot SolidStart
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot SolidStart
SolidStart
- Building lightweight full-stack applications with minimal runtime overheadnot Blacksmith
- Projects requiring fine-grained reactivity and automatic dependency trackingnot Blacksmith
- Applications targeting multiple deployment platforms with single codebasenot Blacksmith
- Teams prioritizing performance and small bundle sizesnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
SolidStart
- Smaller ecosystem compared to Next.js or Remix due to relative newness
- SolidJS less familiar to developers with React experience
- Community documentation not as extensive as larger frameworks
- Limited third-party UI component libraries compared to React ecosystem
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
SolidStart
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the SolidStart review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose SolidStart if
- You need fine-grained reactivity.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want server actions.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or SolidStart better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and SolidStart at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or SolidStart?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and SolidStart at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or SolidStart run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. SolidStart runs on Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what SolidStart is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that SolidStart cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. SolidStart covers Fine-grained reactivity, Server actions, Single-flight mutations, Request deduplication.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceSolidStart: What is SolidJS and how does it differ from React?
SolidJS uses fine-grained reactivity and automatic dependency tracking instead of React's virtual DOM, resulting in smaller bundles and better performance.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceSolidStart: How many deployment platforms does SolidStart support?
SolidStart supports over 20 deployment platforms including Cloudflare, Netlify, Vercel, Deno, AWS, and Azure through Vite plugins.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceSolidStart: Can I use TanStack Router with SolidStart?
Yes, SolidStart supports using either the official Solid Router or TanStack Router depending on project requirements.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs TanStack Start
- Blacksmith vs Remix
- Blacksmith vs Next.js
- Blacksmith vs Qwik
- Blacksmith vs Bolt.new
- Blacksmith vs Django
- Blacksmith vs Alpine.js
- Blacksmith vs Nuxt
- Blacksmith vs Ruby on Rails
- Blacksmith vs MySQL
- Blacksmith vs Docusaurus
- Blacksmith vs React
- Blacksmith vs npm
- Blacksmith vs Astro
- Blacksmith vs Carrd
- Blacksmith vs HTMX
- SolidStart vs WarpBuild
- SolidStart vs Depot
- SolidStart vs Namespace
- SolidStart vs Earthly
- SolidStart vs Nx Cloud
- SolidStart vs OpsLevel
- SolidStart vs Garden
- SolidStart vs ConfigCat
- SolidStart vs Dagger
- SolidStart vs Nix
- SolidStart vs Rust
- SolidStart vs Ansible
- SolidStart vs PartyKit
- SolidStart vs PhpStorm
- SolidStart vs Pieces for Developers
- SolidStart vs RAD Studio
- SolidStart vs Refact
- SolidStart vs TanStack Start
- SolidStart vs Remix
- SolidStart vs Next.js
- SolidStart vs Qwik
- SolidStart vs Bolt.new
- SolidStart vs Django
- SolidStart vs Alpine.js
- SolidStart vs Nuxt
- SolidStart vs Ruby on Rails
- SolidStart vs MySQL
- SolidStart vs Docusaurus
- SolidStart vs React
- SolidStart vs npm
- SolidStart vs Astro
- SolidStart vs Carrd
- SolidStart vs HTMX
