Cybersecurity · head to head
Bitwarden vs Cody

Bitwarden
Cybersecurity
Open source password management for everyone
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bitwarden the integrated TOTP authenticator, encrypted file attachments, vault health reports and Emergency Access are all withheld from the free plan and need Premium at $1.65 per month; Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bitwarden and Cody actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bitwarden
- Unlimited password storage
- Cross-platform sync
- Secure password sharing
- Password generator
- Two-factor authentication
- Encrypted file attachments
- Vault health reports
- Emergency access
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Bitwarden does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bitwarden
- Personal password managementnot Cody
- Team credential sharingnot Cody
- Enterprise securitynot Cody
- Compliance requirementsnot Cody
- Developer secrets managementnot Cody
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Bitwarden
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Bitwarden
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Bitwarden
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Bitwarden
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bitwarden
- The integrated TOTP authenticator, encrypted file attachments, vault health reports and Emergency Access are all withheld from the free plan and need Premium at $1.65 per month
- Free accounts can share vault items with one other Bitwarden user and no more
- File storage is capped at 5 GB on Premium and 5 GB personal plus 5 GB family on the Families plan
- Two-step login accepts up to 10 hardware security keys per account
- The Families plan is capped at 6 people, so a seventh member means moving to a Teams subscription at $4 per user per month
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Pricing, plan by plan
Bitwarden
Free- FreeFree
- Basic password management
- Zero-knowledge encryption
- Advanced two-step login
- Premium$1.65/month
- Integrated authenticator
- File attachments
- Emergency access
- Premium$19.8/year
- Families$3.99/month
- Up to 6 premium accounts
- Unlimited sharing and collections
- Organization storage included
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Bitwarden if
- You need unlimited password storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Web, Cli.
- You also want cross-platform sync.
Questions people ask
- Is Bitwarden or Cody better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bitwarden starts at Free and Cody at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bitwarden or Cody?
- Bitwarden starts at Free and Cody at Free.
- Does Bitwarden or Cody run on more platforms?
- Bitwarden runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Web, Cli. Cody runs on Web.
- Can I use Bitwarden for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bitwarden best used for?
- Bitwarden is most often used for personal password management, team credential sharing, enterprise security, compliance requirements. Of those, personal password management and team credential sharing are not what Cody is typically brought in for.
- What can Bitwarden do that Cody cannot?
- Bitwarden covers Unlimited password storage, Cross-platform sync, Secure password sharing, Password generator.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bitwarden: Does Bitwarden have a free plan?
Yes, Bitwarden offers a free tier with basic password management, zero-knowledge encryption, advanced two-step login, and unlimited devices across browser, mobile, and desktop apps.
SourceCody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceBitwarden: How much does Bitwarden Premium cost?
Bitwarden Premium costs $1.65 per month billed annually at $19.80 per year, including integrated authenticator, file attachments, emergency access, and security reports.
SourceCody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceBitwarden: What is the difference between Bitwarden Teams and Enterprise?
Teams plan at $4 per user per month (annual billing) includes centralized ownership and secure credential sharing. Enterprise at $6 per user per month adds granular access control, passwordless SSO, account recovery, self-hosting, and complimentary Families plans for all users.
SourceCody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Bitwarden vs HashiCorp Vault
- Bitwarden vs Passbolt
- Bitwarden vs LastPass
- Bitwarden vs 1Password
- Bitwarden vs Norton 360
- Bitwarden vs Enpass
- Bitwarden vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Bitwarden vs Infisical
- Bitwarden vs Semgrep
- Bitwarden vs Trivy
- Bitwarden vs Chainguard
- Bitwarden vs Authelia
- Bitwarden vs Veracode
- Bitwarden vs Very Good Security
- Bitwarden vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Bitwarden vs Windscribe
- Bitwarden vs Yoti
- Bitwarden vs authentik
- Bitwarden vs Turborepo
- Bitwarden vs Visual Studio Code
- Bitwarden vs ESLint
- Bitwarden vs pnpm
- Bitwarden vs Sourcegraph
- Bitwarden vs Sweep
- Bitwarden vs Deep Code
- Bitwarden vs GitHub Copilot
- Bitwarden vs Bazel
- Bitwarden vs Fig
- Bitwarden vs GoLand
- Bitwarden vs Steampipe
- Bitwarden vs Tilt
- Bitwarden vs WarpBuild
- Bitwarden vs Webpack
- Bitwarden vs Avo
- Bitwarden vs Azure DevOps
- Bitwarden vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs HashiCorp Vault
- Cody vs Passbolt
- Cody vs LastPass
- Cody vs 1Password
- Cody vs Norton 360
- Cody vs Enpass
- Cody vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Cody vs Infisical
- Cody vs Semgrep
- Cody vs Trivy
- Cody vs Chainguard
- Cody vs Authelia
- Cody vs Veracode
- Cody vs Very Good Security
- Cody vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Cody vs Windscribe
- Cody vs Yoti
- Cody vs authentik
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Steampipe
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs PhpStorm

